The law of large numbers.

Reply #11

Amazing Grace — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:24:36 GMT

so i was off by a mile the next series number was

34825414822

Which if looking at it normal way would be

3,4,8,25,42,48, Bonus 22

I did manage to pull off a 4 number win using this system on the western 6-49

I had all digits but not on same line only ended up with a 4 hit on western

i find its easier to look at the numbers drawn as a series such as

19141720388 and follow the columns up and down to predict next number to fall then move over to new column .

the only reason... [ More ]

Reply #10

Amazing Grace — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:20:05 GMT

One thing to keep in mind is on the first 3 digits that you chose will or can not be over sum of 18

so highest first 3 digits can be is 945 and 954 does not exist.

Reply #9

Amazing Grace — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 01:59:47 GMT

Ok looking in the first row my choice of first numbers would be , 2 or 5 or 8 or 4 or 9 for the next series draw. my second number will be a one so so far my combos are

21

51

81

41

91

but i will also have 10 combos starting with

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

now i will have to predict my 3rd row.

Reply #8

Amazing Grace — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:15:45 GMT

if you read up and down you will notice only 8 of the first digits fall into the high number category.

and 19 of the numbers fall into the odd category.

that is first row up and down.

there are only 7 numbers 6 or above first row. reading up and down.

how about sums first 3 numbers across all the way down starts off as

Sum 4,5,6,14,5,11,17,12,5,14,3,5,3,9,4,12,3,2,13,3,10,3,15,7,7,19,3,11,16,9

so root sums 4,5,6,5,5,2,8,3,5,5,3,5,3,9,4,3,3,2,4,3,1,3,6,7,7,1,3,2,7,9

so i wil... [ More ]

Reply #7

Amazing Grace — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:56:03 GMT

3102123334443

13152829334725

2131925323040

6262733414224

1316214246498

371538434732

269204344446

813212224394

13172133414238

62630384444516

1114293342447

221222934357

11193641464938

351920344731

2202629374517

4173439414626

11142025313648

10113638464826

182332344144649

1112142734488

8202127364811

111434042436

915183435456

115181929375

15182231434926

9192024364810

2101116424321

317364445488

6283031344847

1172429... [ More ]

Reply #6

ladygirl99 — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:40:39 GMT

LOL I hear math is the worst even though i got a B+ in algebra and statistics lol.

Reply #5

Amazing Grace — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:32:47 GMT

this is not printing out the right way

Reply #4

Amazing Grace — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:31:38 GMT

3102123334443131528293347252131925323040626273341422413162142464983715384347322692043444681321222439413172133414238626303844451611142933424472212229343571119364146493835192034473122026293745174173439414626111420253136481011363846482618233234414649111214273448882021273648111114344042436915183435456115181929375151822314349269192024364810210111642432131736444548862830313448471172429344627

Reply #3

Amazing Grace — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:30:54 GMT

Here is a series of numbers. These number have paid out over 200 million dollars in the last 3 months, What is interesting about these are, read up and down instead of across one way, take first 3 digits of each series of numbers can you predict what the next 3 numbers will be, only one rule 0 can not be a first digit,

3102123334443131528293347252131925323040626273341422413162142464983715384347322692043444681321222439413172133414238626303844451611142933424472212229343571119364146493835192... [ More ]

Reply #2

Jimiam — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:06:34 GMT

Can you illustrate this at a little more elementary level. I flunked math. No need in me trying to learn that stuff now is it.

Reply #1

Amazing Grace — Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:51:49 GMT

Which brings me to my next point.

To be continued.

The law of large numbers.

Amazing Grace — Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:50:12 GMT

The weak law

The weak law of large numbers states that if X1, X2, X3, ... is an infinite sequence of random variables, where all the random variables have the same expected value and variance 2; and are uncorrelated (i.e., the correlation between any two of them is zero), then the sample average

converges in probability to . Somewhat less tersely: For any positive number , no matter how small, we have

[edit]

Proof

Chebyshev's inequality is used to prove this result. F... [ More ]