Response to: Any Good Lottery Software

Reply #13

cps10 — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:12:07 GMT

*scratching my head*

I think I didn't explain myself very well. What I meant is that I don't feel the lower tier prizes are worth it in that I don't understand the game well enough to funnel a lot of money into the game and get nothing in return. Who knows? I was on goof-en-thal when I made that post...allergies bad here in the dustbowl of NC.

Reply #12

Rip Snorter — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 01:55:24 GMT

The human mind is an amazing place to live. 2500 years of exposure to logic in the Western world, and statements such as the one you've made here find the light of day without a blush, without an apology, without a chuckle.

j

Reply #11

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:56:24 GMT

Any how, all of that is for later, first pick 3 then pick 4, then jackpot games.

Reply #10

cps10 — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:51:21 GMT

Yes, I understand that. And agreed on the lower-tier prizes. They aren't worth going after at all, even in a Pick-5 game.

Reply #9

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:49:48 GMT

Keith

The main filter trick would be to try to cut down the combos to size.

When you are after the main jackpot prize then lower prices don't mean much, there has to be a trade off of all or nothing in order to cut down the combos to as few as possible, very agressive filtering must be done, that will cut lower prices down as it will only aim for the big price.

After all you have to win only once.

For lower prices there is always the Pick 3 and 4.

A jackpot game is only a much b... [ More ]

Reply #8

cps10 — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:39:30 GMT

Fernando

It sounds very difficult. Especially given the odds in a jackpot game.

Reply #7

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:33:13 GMT

Keith.

Yes, it would be very nice if it can be done.

I tell you that such a program might not be very easy to neither think out nor to code, but maybe can be done.

The problem as always might be the ammount of combos to be played versus the ammount of money won.

Overfiltering gets rid of winning numbers, as using the wrong filters do.

As lower jackpot prices pay little.

To me it will be double trouble than to a designer-programmer who could test as he designs, something that I

Reply #6

cps10 — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:34:33 GMT

A jackpot games filter would be cool...maybe we could all win it someday

Reply #5

EXCALIBUR — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:48:37 GMT

In the future sometime maybe within a year or two, I will design the general guidlines for some kind of jackpot games filter program, as I am not a programmer myself, I will not be able to make it and test it, but the filter principles, one filter at a time, I might be able to test, just one filter portion at a time, but I will not be able to make a list of combos.

Reply #4

lottolaughs — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:20:52 GMT

Great idea about combining the two! That's what you have to do sometimes. One system usually never contains everything you're looking for. I read stuff on here all the time that leads me onto other paths I never even thought of when I'm working on my own systems. You have to keep looking until you find a system that's compatible to what you're doing.

I sure hope the strings will do some good somewhere, ha! They are no good by themselves, first they need a fantabulous wheel and some trimming h... [ More ]

Reply #3

cps10 — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:04:38 GMT

I love LotSoft...that is an amazing program.

Reply #2

kdsjeter — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:03:17 GMT

Thanks for the response Lottolaughs. I really like your strings approach. I am trying to incorporate the two together. If we can get the strings down to 1 or 2, maybe the combination of EL and strings could prove Stellar!

Thanks and keep up the good work

Reply #1

lottolaughs — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:58:31 GMT

Hi kdsjeter!

I downloaded a free sample of Expert Lotto that's been sitting on my computer but now that you mention it, I think I will take a look at it. You are correct in saying that most systems can be worked successfully , you just have to work at it and adjust it to your own needs. Most people don't have the time to do that, which is understandable in today's world. It would be nice to be able to just pick a system and have it work for everyone but I really believe that's impossible. Wi... [ More ]

Response to: Any Good Lottery Software

kdsjeter — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:49:39 GMT

I have been here on LP a while and have remained mostly silent about these Lottery Systems . I have spent alot of time Analyzing various methods and mis-spent money on some of them. I tried MDIE Editor, free. I didn't care for it, but it was free. I paid twice for Gail Howard's systems. Wheel 5 and Advantage Plus, it's okay.

I do get a kick out of how each system has been put to the test here. It has been interesting listening to the voices of reasoning from: RIPSNORTER, CALIFDUDE,... [ More ]