Pencil & paper, day by day vs backtesting

Reply #11

Lotterologist — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:21:17 GMT

Yeah, but i'm a GOOD dog

Reply #10

RJOh — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:56:21 GMT

Tenaj,

I have never suggested anyone stop posting their opinions, theories or systems and I don't pay any attention to anyone who does. Nothing I've ever posted turned a winning system into a losing system. My post was a response to Coin Toss's opinion that the claims of good results using some of the posted system were bogus.

RJOh

Reply #9

guesser — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:54:03 GMT

First, If there were bulletproof systems guaranteeing a win, then the lottery would not exist.

Second, if I had a winning theory, would I tell you ?

Third, I feel I have a fantastic theory, I just can't afford to play it the way it has to be played because it takes more $$$$ than I care to part with (on average, about $80-160 a drawing), and even though I believe 100% in my 'system', I also am smart enough to know that no system is foolproof enough to bet the farm on. I just w... [ More ]

Reply #8

Tenaj — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:51:37 GMT

There's always a hound.

Reply #7

Lotterologist — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:26:02 GMT

LOL! If you know where the WINNERS are, then what are we WAITING for, Tenaj?

Show me the way

Reply #6

Tenaj — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:07:56 GMT

Members who post on the prediction board put forth their best efforts and seldom do any of them show a profit over a long period. That should be an indication of how likely anyone is going to post a winning system or theory.

I've seen a lot of winning systems and winning theories on this board RJOH. They are spread out. It's not the systems or the theories, it's the user. You have to be rooted and grounded in a winner system of your own before other systems and theories can be appreciate... [ More ]

Reply #5

RJOh — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:11:48 GMT

When it comes to talking lotteries, unless I see some actual results it just talk.

I think lots of folks like to think if they come close, then except for making one bad move they all but won so they claim a win for conversation sake only. For pick3 games it been shown that with eight or ten lines, being within one number of a box or a straight hit 80% of the time is not unique. The same applies to pick5 and jackpot games, a few lines with one of two numbers plus or minus one and you coul... [ More ]

Reply #4

Coin Toss — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:03:24 GMT

Most are for pick 3....

Tell me then what is the right way then

Reply #3

guesser — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:51:44 GMT

Tracking numbers is the 100% proven without-a-doubt wrong way to go. That should be evident with the PB 'Challenges' we have twice a week.

Reply #2

Coin Toss — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:41:19 GMT

Say anything you want.

My observation is merely that in tracking 6 methods of number selection I've seen here for almost 100 draws, I haven't seen any of them produce a solid hit.

Two out of three in Pick 3, occassionally, 2 out of 5 in Pick 5, nothing more. Granted Pick 5 is a dream - a mini- dream compared to Pick 6, but still some powerfull odds.

I realize this is a place to test theories, I'm just saying that some of the claims of results seem to be bogus.

But I'll keep tra... [ More ]

Reply #1

guesser — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:26:13 GMT

You said 'This is just observation, not intended as debate', so I don't really know what to say...

Pencil & paper, day by day vs backtesting

Coin Toss — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:33:28 GMT

The thread where are they now?--past members

in lottery discussions

well some of the comments in it, made me think of this.

I've read quite a few if (no one could read them all) of the posts about various means of number selection.

I've been tracking a few that I've seen here, and my findings are different than what some people here claim, but I'll qualify that by saying I track what I'm going to play. For me it's Illinois Evening Pick 3 and Little Lotto.

I also throw a buc... [ More ]