Reverse challenge for PB, Wednesday, 10/11/06

Reply #14

guesser — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 05:48:15 GMT

Those 2 extra numbers ?

It's simple - don't play 50-51-52-53-54-55 in any games.

In the last 50 games, a number from the 50's has hit in 21 games, which means NO 50's have hit in 29 games. Play the odds.

In the last 50 games, 54 or 55 has hit 9 times. Which again means neither has hit in 41 games. Play the odds.

Moreover, in the last 15 games, a number from the 50's has hit 3, yes THREE times. Which means none has hit in 12 games. Odds......

Then again, of th... [ More ]

Reply #13

Maverick2842 — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:40:36 GMT

Damn Gusser!

Now you have something here..... but now that you have discovered the missing link that we all have been looking for (and you know they say oppisite attracts!), well I hope that this will open all of our eyes in hopes to figuring out this great puzzle of ours.

You know when they had added those 2 extra numbers to this Powerball Game back then (like we needed them! LOL!) it hasn't gotten any better for any of us. but we are still trying to get it because we all want thee Powe... [ More ]

Reply #12

guesser — Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:13:54 GMT

If anyone else would like to start and run a reverse challenge - go for it, I won't be offended.

Reply #11

guesser — Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:26:00 GMT

See - I was wrong. #12 hit.

Reply #10

guesser — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:44:26 GMT

The entire point was to pick a few numbers along with a reason why you picked them.

Reply #9

Just6ntlc — Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:48:25 GMT

guesser, when I predict WBs in this challenge you setup, it's the 15 WBs I predict in MADDOG10's PB challenge minus the number of WBs you say that's inelligible. Good luck to everyone.

Reply #8

fja — Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:01:15 GMT

7- showed up once in Feb and repeated itself in March. repeats in Sept shows up once in Oct. 9- What a disappoinment this guy is,,,8 10 are kicking its ass.... 16- Hit 7 times this year...4 in the first column....not its time.21- one of my favorites (probably why its only shown up 4 times this year)27- Not a repeater except for sept...This could be my mistake but it might show in a few draws29- the lost redheaded step child. this number showed up 4 times this year (3 times in the 4th column

Reply #7

guesser — Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:49:37 GMT

3 - two 2-in-rows, possibly a 3-in-a-row ? Unlikely

8 - not 3 2-in-a-rows in 31 games.

2 - numbers that have been hit with both WB and RB in the same game just doesn't hit too frequently after that.

12 - a WB 'usually' (I said USUALLY) does not hit after the PB of the same number hits. Yes, I know it just did, it won't happen this time)

17 - doesn't support hits too close together.

30 - doesn't have the history to support another hit for about another 15 games.

31... [ More ]

Reply #6

Just6ntlc — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 07:08:44 GMT

guesser, I pick 27 because that is PB's estimated jackpot. guesser, you said that 5-44-36-37-53-11-25-34-1 are ineligible. That would mean, I would pick 27-2-48-9-26 as my 5 WBs.

Reply #5

guesser — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 05:25:42 GMT

Oh - the following white ball numbers are ineligible:

5-44-36-37-53-11-25-34-1.

Folks, if I didn't do that, EVERYONE would pick most of them, or all of them.

Please reread my very first posting here to see what I was trying to accomplish, we will either make it work, or it won't work.

Reply #4

guesser — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 05:21:34 GMT

We'd run into the same problems picking the PB as we would if everyone picked all WB longshots (of which most of your picks are all longshots, which defeats the purpose of this......).

So dear tell us: why #27

Reply #3

Just6ntlc — Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:24:03 GMT

guesser, do we have to pick WBs only or both WBs and PBs? If we did pick WBs only, I would guess 1-12-25-34-48. If you pick WBs and PBs, then my pick guesses would be 1-11-27-34-48 PB 8 and 1-11-27-34-48 PB 40.

Reply #2

guesser — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:54:46 GMT

Pick as many or as little as you like, my point was, if we all have our own little 'systems', and independently a majority of us come up with some of the same numbers, maybe that will help us ALL in the future.

What I DON'T want to happen is for someone to list a number, and for the reason they eliminated it to be 'just because', or 'I had a feeling'.

I didn't do 10/7 because I wanted to give folks more time to digest what I was trying to accomplish here, and once we know where we ar... [ More ]

Reply #1

Just6ntlc — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:36:24 GMT

guesser, why did you post this thread for 10/11/06, not 10/7/06 in PB? How many numbers can we pick

Reverse challenge for PB, Wednesday, 10/11/06

guesser — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:36:01 GMT

Yes, for Wednesday, 10/11/2006.

I wanted to try and explain what I'm trying to get at here, some folks don't get it at all.

This is NOT a 'contest' perse' to see who can pick the most losers - if it was, EVERYONE would pick ALL of the longshots, or they would pick 5 consecutive numbers in a row, or they would pick all 5 numbers from the prior game. That's not my intent.

I'm trying to get at how or why folks eliminate some numbers from, say the most recent 10 games or so from... [ More ]