<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Observation</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/152946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Observation</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795730</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795730</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:03:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Thoth</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#x27;t believe that Astrology can consistently give you winning numbers.  At least not to the extent that it will inexplicitly overcome the laws of probability.  What I mean is that, if your Astological number picking system gives you five no-match Pick 3 numbers to play boxed for every drawing, then you will only win about 3% of the time, which is the probability of any five boxed numbers winning.<br /><br />Statistics and probability go hand in hand.  Statistics, as applied to the lottery... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795730">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Thoth</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795430</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795430</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795421</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946/795421</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pacattack05</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Most people in general are curious about their origin, significance in life, and the surrounding universe. Considering that we are all composed of star dust, one can only assume that by looking into a star&#x27;s history and behavior as a source or clue, might help to find patterns and trends, which may or may not apply to the lottery, but it dosen&#x27;t hurt to find out...LOL</p>]]></description>
			<category>pacattack05</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Observation</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:33:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bonesy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,I don&#x27;t know about you but does anyone really buy into the notion of the  stars  will provide the next pick six or seven lottery winning numbers.As well as how can anyone believe in the  statistical analysis  method? Along with the all too favorite  probability method .In my opinion, these are hypothetical notions.Simply put if you play a given range of numbers on a full or abbreviated wheel you will win.How can anything or anyone possibly predict the touchy feely or star like aberra... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/152946">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bonesy</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

