Chaos-Order Duality

Reply #47

JADELottery — Tue, 15 May 2007 20:06:01 GMT

I was not offended by you in anyway and it was not meant to be directed at you specifically. I was referring to the second paragraph in general and to the public at large.

Reply #46

delores247 — Tue, 15 May 2007 19:41:34 GMT

Doug i was only giving you a compliment on your Work,and you are correct your Work,i would never ever take anybody else's material and use it for greed i only play the game for entertainment purposes and i don't play everyday,i also use what i stated,The theory of Relativity that has been around before i even started playing the game in 1993,If i offended you with my reply then Today i come to you with an apology,I think i will stick to just reading the threads and no replies because i see it ma... [ More ]

Reply #45

JADELottery — Tue, 15 May 2007 19:19:35 GMT

Before I reply Delores247, I have to give this warning to those who would use what I'm about to write. DO NOT use my words to support your greedy, egocentric, popularity seeking, population controlling, petty grasping ambitions. The information I post is meant for us all, is to be seen as a whole and not to be taken out of context. If you do, the wrath will come unseen, because part of it is already inside of you call the conscience and acts as judge, jury and executioner.

Delores247, I think... [ More ]

Reply #44

delores247 — Mon, 14 May 2007 15:08:13 GMT

I just like to say that this a very nice and interesting Thread; i believe in order and The Theory of Relativity,Everything is put in a certain order in the world from the different Telephone numbers we have ,our ssnumber,serial numbers and so on,They are in such perfect order that when the beginning of my ss#number hit i always know to play the other end,They are so ordered that on the All States results Chart when all midday numbers hit they actually let's you know what direction to go for you... [ More ]

Reply #43

Hyperdimension — Sun, 13 May 2007 05:27:31 GMT

Yeah, I imagine that problem..

Keep up the good work

Reply #42

JADELottery — Sun, 13 May 2007 05:26:39 GMT

Keep in mind also there are three different kinds of lottery: Permutation, Combination and Combinatoric Permutation.

Permutation is a specific sequence of random selection. This means the sequence of selection is important for any random selection.

Examples: Pick 3 or Pick 4

Combination is a random selection that does not consider the sequence of selection. The sequence of selection is not important.

Examples: Pick 5 of 31 or Pick 6 of 49

Combinatoric Permutation is an ord... [ More ]

Reply #41

JADELottery — Sun, 13 May 2007 05:14:31 GMT

It could be possible, but you would also be dealing with a 14th Dimensional Space to derive Hue Groups. Possible, but very involved. I worked an algorithmic way to derive for 4th Space and could be extended to Higher Space Levels.

Reply #40

Hyperdimension — Sun, 13 May 2007 05:02:55 GMT

Hi JadeLottery,

Is it possible to apply your HTRAC system to a lotto type 14 of 42? or the HTRAC system works only for Pick3 and Pick4?

Regards

Reply #39

JADELottery — Sun, 13 May 2007 04:52:03 GMT

Actually it is correct, for Absolute Brightness of 1 and Contrasts 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8, the total combos is 242.

Reply #38

WSN1 — Sat, 12 May 2007 18:25:28 GMT

Which program are we referring to. I have the excel application example_pick_3_H-trac but I dont think that quite it

Reply #37

JADELottery — Sat, 12 May 2007 16:03:50 GMT

It's what I would expect for a high sample count. The Theoretical hit count for a sample of 6832 would be 6832 * (242 / 1000) = 1653.344, which is near the count of 1632. Only off by about +21.344 or +0.31241% of the sample and +1.3078% of the hit count, close enough to say that theory is consistent with real world random selection.

Reply #36

CARBOB — Sat, 12 May 2007 14:01:53 GMT

Doug,

I pulled your Pick 3 H-TRAC program out, again, because you mentioned it. Looking at a stat that I don't know what to make of. For Fla Absolute Brightness 1, Contrast 0,2,4,6,8 has 242 combos, which is 24% of the 1000 combos. It has a hit ratio of 1632/6832, 24%. Does that surprise you or is that what one would expect

Reply #35

JADELottery — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:58:12 GMT

ok, time for a break... my head spinning like crazy now from ideas, ideas, ideas... think, think, think.

Reply #34

JADELottery — Fri, 11 May 2007 13:17:34 GMT

Insight 6, I think the reason quarks exist as a triad of particles with a color charge that sums to a neutral charge in a proton or neutron could be explained with 3 other posts I've made related to Pick 3. First is the Combinatorics of a Permutation, second is the Mapping of Pick 3 Data into the RGB Color Cube and last is JADELottery's Pick 3 H-Trac System. Combinatorics of a Permutation shows the relation between a Combinatorial Base Set and their Permutational Base Forms. The Mapping of Pick... [ More ]

Reply #33

JADELottery — Fri, 11 May 2007 12:38:32 GMT

You just helped me realize something else. Some of what I'm going to post is related to Pick 3.

Reply #32

WSN1 — Fri, 11 May 2007 09:10:36 GMT

How do you the Cover Master with pick3

Reply #31

JADELottery — Fri, 11 May 2007 01:31:10 GMT

Also, related to Combinatorial Symmetry are the Combinatorial Symmetry Folds. This could also be used to explain anti-mater.

Reply #30

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 20:44:40 GMT

Insight 5, Symmetry is everywhere in Quantum Mechanics. With the relationship between the Combinatorial Function and the Beta Function, another post of mine on Combinatorial Symmetry seems to show this. There are combinations that are symmetrical with other combinations and some combinations that are symmetrical with itself, just what we see in Quantum Mechanics.

Reply #29

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 20:34:44 GMT

Insight 4, String Theory may have it right about the inner workings of the elementary particles. The direct relation of the Beta function and the Combination function could be what brings it together. C(n, k) = 1 / ((n + 1) * B(n - k + 1, k + 1)), where C(n, k) combination or binomial function and B(a, b) is the Beta function; also, a = n - k + 1 and b = k + 1. In addition, we may find out that strings are comprised of even smaller parts yet, the Fractal; witch is demonstrated in another post I

Reply #28

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 18:26:40 GMT

Insight 3, I think the virtual particles we observe in this Universe could be evidence of the order in a dimensionally adjacent Universe and/or is evidence of a higher level of dimension to our own Universe. Virtual particles have to come from somewhere and that somewhere could be from an existing space our Universe is expanding into and/or the residual or incidental contact with another Universe like our own.

Reply #27

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 18:12:13 GMT

Insight number 2, I think the reason why some particles decay is because of the passing those particles through the Continuum of Chaos. Chaos reshuffles the order of something like quark, neutron, pion, or omega particle. Sometimes it returns as the same particle and sometimes it does not, hence, a decay. In simple terms, there is a small lottery going on right now in every particle in the Universe as it passes through the continuum to arrive as a particle in the Instum. Einstein said, God does... [ More ]

Reply #26

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 17:28:29 GMT

To give a brief insight into what I'm thinking, I think that the Strong and Weak Nuclear forces are Instum forces and the Gravitational and Electrical forces are Continuum forces and that all four forces are interchangeable and exchangeable at the Chaos-Order Quantum level.

Reply #25

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 17:08:57 GMT

There is also a revision filed 1991-12-19, TXU 501883, revised a chapter.

Reply #24

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 17:00:06 GMT

Correction, the Title is It's Time... and the registration number is TXU 492260, registered 1991-07-03. Found the paper work and shows how forgot about it all this time.

Reply #23

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 16:44:50 GMT

The reason the Gravitational force is negative and the Electrostatic force is positive for like charges is because Gravity acts to decrease the distance between the two like charges, negative, and Electricity acts to increase the distance between two like charges, positive.

Reply #22

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 16:28:34 GMT

For those of you interested, I'll help save an immediate step in going to the Library of Congress to verify. Here's the Electric Charge and Gravitational Charge Relationship.

Newton's Law of Gravitational Attraction Equation

F = G (m1 * m2) / dg2

m1 and m2 are two different mass charges and dg is the distance between them.

G is the Universal Gravitational Constant.

F is the force of attraction.

Coulomb's Law of Electrostatics Equation

F = k (Q1 * Q2... [ More ]

Reply #21

JADELottery — Thu, 10 May 2007 15:24:12 GMT

I've come across something interesting. It's more like a stumble and take notice while theorizing. It relates to a theory/discovery I made quite a number of years ago, about 15-18 years. I have a non-published copyrighted text that shows the relationship between electric charge and gravitational charge. The name of the text is, It's About Time... It all makes sense now with my study in combinatorics and chaos-order duality. It might explain why particles decay, why gravity was and still is the... [ More ]

Reply #20

JADELottery — Tue, 08 May 2007 17:22:59 GMT

it's in the works... however, the flowers need waterin' and the grass needs mowin'. i think about it doin' home work and real work all the time. my mind constantly running, even when i sleep. it's the puttin' in to words that is the hard part, because most of this stuff has never been though of before. to quote, I answer as simply as your level of understanding makes possible. ; unfortunately that includes myself.

Reply #19

WSN1 — Tue, 08 May 2007 17:14:33 GMT

Man this is good stuff. Keep it coming! and ofcourse I looking forward to the end of this journey (thread), however the journey is awakening.

Reply #18

NewClub — Tue, 08 May 2007 15:00:55 GMT

Thanks. The stable and unstable Continuum and Instum pair are quite clear now. However, the definition of Chaos and Order are not clear. When Continuum is in Order, is there infinite possibilities? When Instum is in Chaos, does that mean infinite possibilities for Instum

Reply #17

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 14:34:12 GMT

Updated table.

InstumContinuum

Order

Instantaneous

Infinitesimal

Dimension

Digital

ParticleChaos

Continuous

Infinite

Dimensionless

Analog

Wave

The reason the Continuum is Infinite and Dimensionless is because it contains all the Infinite Possible Outcomes.

The Instum is Infinitesimal and has Dimension because it contains only one of the Infinite Possible Outcomes.

Reply #16

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 07:51:08 GMT

Here's is a table of some related or analogous Stable Chaos-Order Quantum State descriptions.

InstumContinuum

Order

Infinitesimal

Dimension

Digital

ParticleChaos

Infinite

Dimensionless

Analog

Wave

Reply #15

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 06:59:59 GMT

To redirect your questions, Chaos and Order exist simultaneously. However, like the Pauli Exclusion Principle, Chaos and Order cannot exist in either the Continuum or the Instum at the same moment or the same time.

Reply #14

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 06:40:36 GMT

Quantum States of Chaos-Order Duality, Symmetry and Memory

Symmetry suggest there is another Quantum State of Chaos-Order Duality. The other Quantum State is a Continuum of Order and an Instum of Chaos. This is an Unstable Quantum State and must return to the Stable Quantum State of Continuum of Chaos and Instum of Order. The Unstable Quantum State is extremely unstable and can only happen from instant to instant or from one infinitesimal unit to another. Also, it is easy to achieve the Unsta... [ More ]

Reply #13

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 02:49:25 GMT

Just a side note about the infinitesimal unit in the instum and the continuum.

The infinitesimal unit has dimension and the continuum is dimensionless.

Reply #12

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 02:36:16 GMT

Yep, getting to that point in a bit.

Reply #11

NewClub — Sat, 05 May 2007 02:21:20 GMT

Thanks.

The relationship between infinitesimal unit, continuum and instum is quite clear. Is continuum always in a status of Chaos and the instum in a status of Order? When universe is in a state of Order, does that only refer to the status of instum or it means continuum is also included and continuum is also in a status of Order? When the Universe is in a state of Chaos, does that only refer to the status of continuum

Reply #10

JADELottery — Sat, 05 May 2007 01:14:05 GMT

Infinitesimal Unit, Continuum and Instum, Continuum of Chaos and Instum of Order

The Infinitesimal Unit is expressed as (1 / ) and is the first number and only the first number after the number zero. Zero and the Infinitesimal Unit both exist side-by-side with nothing in between; meaning there is no number that can be derived by any process or can expressed to exist between zero and the Infinitesimal Unit. The Infinitesimal Unit also exists at any point simultaneously with a Continuum and In... [ More ]

Reply #9

NewClub — Fri, 04 May 2007 21:38:46 GMT

Thanks.

I can understand the symmetrical characteristic of the remaining set.

But, I am eager to know where this analysis is leading to, so please allow me quickly turn to the last page of the book. Will this analysis lead to a better prime wheeling system, or will it improve the odds of winning?

I will be waiting for your reply and the rest of the story.

Reply #8

JADELottery — Fri, 04 May 2007 20:58:52 GMT

Before I start, I ask that you clear your mind of your existing perception of order and chaos. I can see this new concept is slowly pulling you into a paradoxical like state. Just sit back and take few breaths, haaa-ahhh, and read. Also, there are additional posts to come that need to be explained; they help in better understanding of this new concept.

First, the example I gave at the beginning is an over simplified example. The first selected set {1, 2, 3, 5, 7} and the remaining set {4, 6,

Reply #7

JADELottery — Fri, 04 May 2007 19:54:43 GMT

i'll come back to this in a bit. i have a few things to tend to that is also related to this topic.

Reply #6

NewClub — Fri, 04 May 2007 19:49:57 GMT

How that {2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10} becomes an order?

Or, maybe order is just a relative term compare to higher magnitude chaos. The original {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} has higher magnitude of chaos, now the subsets {1,5} and {2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10} have much less magnitude of chaos, thus term them order .

If, only if 9 and 4 in the subset {2,3,4,6,7,8,9,10} become different from other numbers, then that will be able to help us improve the odds of winning. But is that different

Reply #5

JADELottery — Fri, 04 May 2007 19:04:21 GMT

the remaining order of {1, 5} is the order {2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}.

Reply #4

NewClub — Fri, 04 May 2007 14:24:37 GMT

Can you give an explaination about what kind of order the remaining become, if {1,5} subset was drawn from {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}? I think {1,2,3,5,7} is such a special case, in that you pick a subset with a rule, on-purposely avoiding 9 after you pick 1.

I understand what you meant by picking 6/49 is the same as picking 43/49. But how that will help us?

I am sorry if I sound negative, I really do not mean that. I am not good at expressing my appreciation when I discuss an topic, and fucu... [ More ]

Reply #3

JADELottery — Fri, 04 May 2007 07:58:10 GMT

just got home from a long day of work and personal business. i have a few more things to add to round this topic out. sleep time, now.

Reply #2

JADELottery — Thu, 03 May 2007 18:35:35 GMT

Coherent Event Symmetry, Instantaneous Property of Order and the Continuous Property of Chaos

This is a related redirect of the 1st post, 2nd paragraph.

The Coherent Event Symmetry is the Natural Reasonable Expectation that properties and/or characteristics in one event point to the same properties and/or characteristics in it's symmetrical event. It looks something like this, below are two images with a mirror to illustrate symmetry. One of these looks natural the other does not. The Blac... [ More ]

Reply #1

JADELottery — Thu, 03 May 2007 09:45:23 GMT

I have a follow up reply, but need a bit of sleep; been up since 8:00a yesterday. it's a redirect and explanation of the second paragraph.

Chaos-Order Duality

JADELottery — Thu, 03 May 2007 07:30:37 GMT

Chaos-Order Duality

Chaos-Order Duality is analogous to Wave-Particle Duality. I'll refer to finite data sets as they easier to explain. In any finite set of possible outcomes, the set is in a state of chaos as long as no order has been established in that set. The instant an ordered set or ordered subset is defined within a finite set of possible outcomes, the remaining set of outcomes and the entire set of possible outcomes becomes ordered even though there appears to be no obvious or appar... [ More ]