lottosync 1.6 breakthrough??

Reply #7

moeman — Thu, 17 May 2007 23:54:41 GMT

I am not computer savy but what has the speed got to with it.Programs are written by commands.How can the speed change the outcome and if it does how can the system seller or writer of the program make claims as the outcome of the method.

Reply #6

LANTERN — Wed, 16 May 2007 08:40:37 GMT

Vick

It seems to me that by now it is clear that any newer versions of

LottoSync if there are any are only for Marco's own use and that all

or most of us will never get them, but nothing is for sure.

Reply #5

paul762 — Sun, 13 May 2007 08:50:05 GMT

I wonder if this lower sample will only provide lower tier prizes like 3's and 4's ? maybe the higher samples provide the higher prizes after a longer playing time ?

Good Luck anyway

Reply #4

irondoor827 — Sun, 13 May 2007 07:34:28 GMT

sounds good

Reply #3

vick — Sun, 13 May 2007 04:36:21 GMT

seems like your computer's tuned best for 200 samples luckyhorse -

i'm going to do some back test for ontario 49 and check

but STILL WAITING FOR 1.8

Reply #2

luckyhorse — Sun, 13 May 2007 03:14:19 GMT

yep sample size of 200 for my computer seems to work best hit 4/10 in canada 6/49 tonight

Reply #1

paul762 — Fri, 11 May 2007 11:11:13 GMT

I remember saying something a while ago to Vick about the lower samples seeming to be more accurate? however when i tested it, it was more in the 400-600 range for my pc (3.4ghz).

This still doesnt solve the problem of not predicting numbers from the last draw though, and I seemed to have more luck when using the lower samples and doing numerous predictions until 6-10 numbers repeated the most, and then playing those numbers. But I used it for the Irish Lotto most of the time.

However I do... [ More ]

lottosync 1.6 breakthrough??

luckyhorse — Fri, 11 May 2007 02:04:33 GMT

i maybe found the missing link that can make this program run to full potential i went through the diffrenet sample sizes and found my computer seems to hit the numbers when a sample size is between 150-200 because my computer is slower it seems to run better with lower sample sizes for example back testing the last 2 draws i found it hit 3/10 and then a 4/10 just missing ther fifth number i thinkl the ideal sample sizes will vary from computer to computer it will be up to you the user to back t... [ More ]