|Posted: May 11, 2007, 7:11 am - IP Logged|
I remember saying something a while ago to Vick about the lower samples seeming to be more accurate? however when i tested it, it was more in the 400-600 range for my pc (3.4ghz).
This still doesnt solve the problem of not predicting numbers from the last draw though, and I seemed to have more luck when using the lower samples and doing numerous predictions until 6-10 numbers repeated the most, and then playing those numbers. But I used it for the Irish Lotto most of the time.
However I dont use lottosync at all anymore, I currently just use lotterycracker.
Life's Tragedy is that we get old to soon and wise too late - Benjamin Franklin.