"Lottery Ruminations"

Reply #31

justxploring — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:26:52 GMT

I've got to give you a hand, Badger. Thanks, Pac.

Reply #30

pacattack05 — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:42:17 GMT

It was Maude. She mostly said that to her husband, but also used it on others.

Reply #29

Badger — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:19:51 GMT

I can't remember which. But she got quite a deal for the Golden Girls. It really trumped Maude. <running away now

Reply #28

justxploring — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:59:56 GMT

I know Bea Arthur used to say that a lot. Was that as Maude or Dorothy in the Golden Girls?

Well enough card puns. I'm going to slip out of my suit and go outside for a while on my deck.

Reply #27

Coin Toss — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:56:44 GMT

Whenever you have a Pick 3 or 4 you have ahuch about and are planning to play more than $1 worth - there won't be any playslips.

Reply #26

pacattack05 — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:05:10 GMT

Yup ! Bingo...lol

One of the biggest BS artists around.

His latest crap is just as bad as all the other ones.

The only one which has a little merit was one of the first ones he came out with back in 1988. It was about how to locate people who have HUD refunds due to them.

The tricky part is using resources that have not already been exhausted in finding these people. I had one idea with people finders , but I think someone most likely beat me to that...lol

Reply #25

Thoth — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:40:27 GMT

Don Lapree?? LOL....Hey, aint that the guy who will show you how to make millions right out of your tiny one-bedroom apatment

Reply #24

Badger — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:27:07 GMT

You know God will get you for all that.

Reply #23

pacattack05 — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:26:28 GMT

Where...to Buffalo

Reply #22

justxploring — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:21:12 GMT

I know. Some of those guys really have a pair, don't they? Then he'll surprise me with a diamond and I'll be his queen, but I'll end up with a bunch of kids and a full house. (groan) No more hanging around those clubs for me. (bigger groan) Wow - it's after 10. I better shuffle off.

Reply #21

RJOh — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:03:22 GMT

There nothing wrong with using statistics as long as you expect results that are logical statistically. By logical statistically I mean results that normally happened in the past when you check the statistics fully.

For example in a 649 games a player might play the 10 hottest numbers that hit 8-10 times in the previous 50 drawings thinking it's logical to expect four or more of those numbers to be in the winning combination so he wheels them to cover all the possible combinations of fours... [ More ]

Reply #20

Badger — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:53:59 GMT

Just be careful. If he's a real card, he might be a Joker. And one never knows about those wild cards.

Reply #19

Badger — Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:52:13 GMT

No, what I was referring to was doing the same thing over and over...like using statistics which are logical, and getting the same result....as in losing because things that are due don't show up and things that shouldn't show up, do.

And yes, perhaps anticipating an outcome is counter productive. Perhaps we should allow the cosmos to give it to us in any chaotic, illogical manner. After all, going with that route could produce no worse results than losing....which is no different than l... [ More ]

Reply #18

jarasan — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:21:10 GMT

it's doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results

Badger we are expecting different results on each draw, the hard part is predicting the same results of the draw for that game at the same time. What you are refering to is a winning result.

And your point is excellent, maybe if we try not so hard to force an outcome, the rhythm will find us.

Go with the flow.

Reply #17

justxploring — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:19:10 GMT

(Just ask Alice when she's ten feet tall...or in this case, just ask Justxploring!)

I hope the obsession I have with playing my numbers isn't the same thing as falling in love, Coin Toss. That would mean if I meet Mr. Right, he'd have to be a real card I'd be forced to play with him every Wed Sat night so I wouldn't miss a payout.

Reply #16

Coin Toss — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:46:10 GMT

LP Ruminations:

If you fall in love with a set of numbers you will become paranoid about them being drawn if you miss a drawing or play different numbers.

(Just ask Alice when she's ten feet tall...or in this case, just ask Justxploring!)

___________________________

If you're aware, you will notice numbers everyday. Some of these will hit, some won't. The law of the cosmos says that the people they are most likely to hit for are the people that aren't even aware of them.... [ More ]

Reply #15

Badger — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:12:20 GMT

Well can you send one to me via PM? When I get a bit of time to ponder, it could be an interesting read.

Reply #14

Badger — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:09:29 GMT

Thanks Coin Toss. You know, at one time I was looking down my nose at things like Bio Rythms, etc...but you know what they say about insanity: it's doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. And it seems to me that we here have all been doing the same things (using too much logic perhaps) in trying to accomplish lottery wins, and we keep getting the same results: losses.

Maybe its time to try the things that shouldn't work as opposed to trying to use the things th... [ More ]

Reply #13

Badger — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:00:20 GMT

I forgot to point out that this is very similar to how the gravity in our universe works. There is no gravity unless there is mass present. Let me say this again.....There is no gravity, unless there is mass present

But if you were observing (anything) then there would be mass present ; namely the observer. Therefore there would be gravity. (Heisenberg, Schodinger) If you are observing from a distance (e.g. Hubble) and looking at empty space, it would more be Schrodinger.... You don't know... [ More ]

Reply #12

Coin Toss — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:25:35 GMT

Was that on Lon Gyeland

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:10:10 GMT

Ever since I can remember, I had a thing for Jewish girls. Back in the 70s. Her name was Laurie Lubitz in Junior high school, in band. I knew I didn't have a chance because of the football hunk, Mike Levi she was dating. I did hook up with a different one that was as crazy, but not as hot.

OY Vey! Ga Vault!

She was definitely a trip ! She actually wanted an allowance...lol Plus a moped!!!

Remember...I was only 13, getting my own allowance...lol

The good old days in Fores... [ More ]

Reply #10

justxploring — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:50:43 GMT

There is no gravity, unless there is mass present.What does this really mean?

Oy! I think it means I need to buy a girdle

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:36:35 GMT

Nope! No Don La ploom here...lol

Or is it Don Lapree?( Step by step)......

Reply #8

Coin Toss — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:17:26 GMT

Badger

It's a very entertaining book, but on the technical side, you're not going to learn anything that you can learn here on LP.

He has a list of recommnded reading and almost all of it is of the self-help genre. He also talks about Neuro-linguistic programming.

He's also into things like biorhythms, big time.

Here's the chapter titles:

1. Wining Jackpots: Ralistic Goal or Pipe Dream

2. Luck Deconstruct Ways to Improve Your Luck

3. Technological Tools More

4. W... [ More ]

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 03:41:44 GMT

Hineken Rules......

Reply #6

jarasan — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:28:49 GMT

Since we are making our list of Ruminations I assume the rumination of long ponderance and discussion, not the counting of large numbers or being overly worried.

Here is mine:

Winning is in the timing, in order to win, you have to be in the right place at the right time, when this occurs good LUCK happens.

Sooner or later, you match the phase of the LUCK cycle and you instantly are in the right place at the right time no matter what the circumstance is, you are going to win.

Reply #5

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:50:31 GMT

LOL>>>

They are not posted. I couldn't find the original post I made. I had to re-type it here at the LP.

I can make copies and send them...lol

Reply #4

Badger — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:47:59 GMT

That's correct. There is only Random Number Displacement. Once you verify the deviance, you can the predict the pattern, therefore pridict the winning number about 80 percent of the time correctly. But you first have to do your homework. This is no pie in the sky. Read and re-read the excerpts I've posted.

========================

Hey Pac...where are those posted? I'm also interested in a little deviance. LOL

Reply #3

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:45:16 GMT

I forgot to point out that this is very similar to how the gravity in our universe works. There is no gravity unless there is mass present. Let me say this again.....There is no gravity, unless there is mass present.What does this really mean? I'll tell ya!

Just like in the comparison with the Koycerin method, there is no such thing as chaos, just a deviation from the norm.

SO.....If you have a universe which is void of any material objects, then you would also be void of gravity.

I us... [ More ]

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:13:57 GMT

Chapter 5 of the book is titled Lottery Techniques and Strategies- there's no such thing as randomness.

That's correct. There is only Random Number Displacement. Once you verify the deviance, you can the predict the pattern, therefore pridict the winning number about 80 percent of the time correctly. But you first have to do your homework. This is no pie in the sky. Read and re-read the excerpts I've posted.

But only with the help of the programming geniuses here at the LP, will I be abl... [ More ]

Reply #1

Badger — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:31:15 GMT

What do you think of the book overall? Is it worth the time to read it (which takes away from doing other things) and do you think you may be better armed for the lotteries now than before you read it

"Lottery Ruminations"

Coin Toss — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:49:43 GMT

These are from the book Winning the Lottery In Your Spare Time (With Very Little Money) by C.F. Keller

At the end of the book he has a few pages of Lottery Ruminations - I'll post a coupe here and thought maybe we could go fcrom ther and make our own list.

From the book:

We make our best decisions using our left and right brains because both brains are intertwined. The old school of thought about keeping emotins out of the decision making process should be challenged.

A number's pa... [ More ]