A winning first division Jackpot system

Reply #25

lottoburg — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:29:07 GMT

Hi, LANTERN:

Who are the Mike and Ricky? Where I can find their pick-3/4 system? Thanks.

Best,

lottoburg

Reply #24

LANTERN — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:15:36 GMT

Not really that old, on my early 50s, but of course my mind is not as it was, it wants to turn to mush too soon.

I need to keep on trying to crack the lottery to stay sharper longer.

I did have a C-64 myself, I should had done as you did, Now I regret that I didn't.

Computing helps a lot at cracking the lottery games.

Good luck.

Reply #23

RJOh — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:46:33 GMT

post by LANTERN

If I had been introduced to the lottery games when I was young and if there had been internet and lottery programs back then and also of course personal computers, the state lotteries would had a lot to fear from me, as my mind was so quick back then, by now I would had already cracked even the hardest to crack jackpot games.

Just how old are you?

I started tracking local lotteries using a Commodore64 in the seventies. The IBM computer was introduced in the early e... [ More ]

Reply #22

LANTERN — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:02:07 GMT

That is true, but while I do it for fun and don't gamble, to me predicting is also serious business, cracking the game is fun, not cracking it is not.

I do need to go back to the prediction basics as I see them, I have been using a predicitons program and that is not good, I need to do as I used to long ago and re-learn how to Extract the winning number out of the Full Source of pick 3 numbers, much harder to do, but better than depending on a predicting program to give you the winning nu... [ More ]

Reply #21

RJOh — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:50:28 GMT

As long as you're having fun, what does it matter if you miss a few? Even the top predictors are lucky to hit more than 1 out of 20 and the ones at the top of the list are always changing.

Reply #20

LANTERN — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:49:56 GMT

Well I am a wash-out I am not a good predictor anymore, I will quit trying to predict and go back to trying to learn and relearn.

Maybe no more public predictions period.

Reply #19

RJOh — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:51:21 GMT

There's a lot of luck whenever anyone wins a lottery prize whether they're using software of not. Too bad, luck can't be programmed, at least no one has made such a claim.

Reply #18

LANTERN — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:36:29 GMT

Do a search on MikeK here at LP.

Reply #17

LANTERN — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:55:20 GMT

As this stuff is TABU or TABOO here at LP I will send an PM to you about it.

There are many programs some appear to be better than others, I have tested a few, but not all as there are not trials for all of them.

I favor the Hit Wave 34 the most.

But some people have said that they do good with some others.

I used to favor 3 others before, as they are fairly good also.

Reply #16

RJOh — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:25:16 GMT

Quote:posted by LANTERN

-----------------------

Yes, I don't gamble, I post and predict for fun.

I post and predict for fun too, but I can't resist speculating on a chance to turn $5 into thousands once in a while, I enjoy that too especially when I win. The best I've ever done is turn $10 into $1500 a few years back with Ohio Super Lotto. Overall I've lose money but no more than had I enjoyed smoking and drinking instead. With MegaMillion jackpot at $250M tonight, I'm getting the urge... [ More ]

Reply #15

reddog — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:45:49 GMT

Are you all refering to LotoMike

Reply #14

hennybogan — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:48:36 GMT

Hi Lantern. Ole Duke and I really appreciate you and your posts. I have Ricky's software and subscribe to his hot tips. But, I do not know anything about Mike and his predictor software. How can I get a copy and what is it called? Thanks Lantern.

Reply #13

LANTERN — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:37:09 GMT

Yes, I don't gamble, I post and predict for fun.

I was or maybe still am the StatsOlogist and here on Tx I could almost win at one time on demand, my demand.

'Filters I am so to speak or was, the FilterOlogist Not anymore I guess, it took loads of time and very hard work, you make your own luck.

The future is in the draws, there is the crystal ball.

Ia m a gazer of past draws patterns a pick 3 diviner.

The Oracle at Delphi is my example and of course good old Nostradamus.

I... [ More ]

Reply #12

LANTERN — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:27:07 GMT

MaHitPro

Is really the worse of them all, but after countless hours of use you might be able to force it to give you something and with a very special trick I forced it to give me pairs to use for Tx, but I quit using it long ago, might again i the future.

Lottery sorcerer was so so not as bad for Tx, but not as good either, I quit trying too soon due to lack of time and other pick 3 tools to use such as filters software.

Mike's predicting software easy to use and not too bad results fo... [ More ]

Reply #11

RJOh — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:23:48 GMT

Quote:posted by LANTERN

-----------------------

I have not used Lotto software, but some of the pick 3 tools from Mike and Ricky just keep on winniing even after maybe more than 2 years of not using them, they were winning back then and as I just started to use them again they are still given golden eggs. Mike's both as tools and as predictors and Ricky's as tools.

They are so cheap almost free for what you can do with them (Win and keep on winning) if you keep using them instead of quitin... [ More ]

Reply #10

Badger — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:49:11 GMT

Lantern, this must indeed all be relative. I do use VersaBet34 and like the program as a tool. However, as a predicting software (I assume you're referring to the Bet Wizard) it is horrible. I've had it for years and at least in WI, it can spew out a lot of boxed combinations, but even though they're boxed, it seldom actually gets a hit. Not anything even close to a profit has it ever done here. According to the authors, they admit that it does better in some states than in others . WI is n... [ More ]

Reply #9

LANTERN — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:23:20 GMT

I have not used Lotto software, but some of the pick 3 tools from Mike and Ricky just keep on winniing even after maybe more than 2 years of not using them, they were winning back then and as I just started to use them again they are still given golden eggs. Mike's both as tools and as predictors and Ricky's as tools.

They are so cheap almost free for what you can do with them (Win and keep on winning) if you keep using them instead of quiting as I did.

Check out my blog for the latest so... [ More ]

Reply #8

Badger — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:20:44 GMT

LOL ! I am so glad to hear it isn't just me that encounters this ! Although I will say I am fed up entirely with the customer service (non-customer service) from Satori Publishing on Lotto Sorceror.

But at least if the software pays for itself in the trial period, then when the sizzle turns to fizzle, it isn't as bad.

Reply #7

BobP — Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:21:17 GMT

There is a lot of beginner's luck with lottery software, then you learn how to use it properly and it stops winning. Won first time out of the box with Lotto Sorcerer and Lotto Creo, the sizzle quickly turned to fizzle. BobP

Reply #6

RJOh — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:34:38 GMT

PadawanLotto of Dayton,OH ran some tests and was one of the top 10 predictors for a while but seems to have given up and stopped posting about six months ago.

He did well when he predicted W.Va.Cash25, but so do I and I use software I wrote myself. Probably like me, he couldn't do as well with the harder lotteries and gave up but I'm still trying.

Reply #5

reddog — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:40:19 GMT

Must work good only in Australia because there was no member in the USA back then would perticipate with the challenge. Someone correct me if I am wrong. I don't want to hump on anybody's leg for a good system.

Reply #4

Tom9041 — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:21:34 GMT

It's DEFINATELY the best lotto program available at present. I bought it after reading about it here. I only use this program have had lots of minor prizes, which have more than paid for the initial cost of the program, plus the cost of placing the bets. I have come very close several times now to a second division win. The program has excellent filters, the admin team are always open to new suggestions are very quick to implement them.

Reply #3

reddog — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:18:14 GMT

I still have a bad taste in my mouth about the challenge that was put up to Lotto Expert. All talk and no action. And I was told by one certain member that I was like a dog humping a leg. I won't forget that.

Reply #2

Maryland — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:15:49 GMT

Still excited about hit RHOh

Reply #1

RJOh — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:43:16 GMT

A couple of years ago, several members were excited about that program as you are now. They don't post much any more but if you do a lotto expert search that goes back two years or more you'll find their posts.

A winning first division Jackpot system

paul2061 — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:53:58 GMT

Recently in N.Z., a person won over $2 million by winning first division in lotto. When asked how he did it he said he used lotto wheels , a computer program called Lotto Expert Being very jubious about the whole thing, I downloaded a trial version of Lotto Expert (costs nothing) to try out. After only a short time, I have had many 4th 5th division prizes, a significant improvement on any other programs I have had.( actually managing to show a profit LOL). I have a feeling it's on... [ More ]