<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Capitalize on pairs.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/162952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Capitalize on pairs.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/920911</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/920911</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Amazing Grace</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This method just keeps on producing in Wc i have used count backs 4,5,6 seems to work better, and can eliminate non wanted pairs with v-trac returns.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Amazing Grace</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/906590</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/906590</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Amazing Grace</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Excellent let me know how it fairs.<br /><br />In order for any system to work you need to have faith, once that is established<br /><br />the doors are open.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Amazing Grace</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/906149</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/906149</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 03:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LottoBuster</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amazing Grace, what I ve been working on the last few months is a system with pairs that is based on creating variations from each days number. It s kind of hard to explain but I ve found a way to effectively filter out at least half of the 100 possible combinations as a starting point. After additional elimination I ve got about 6 numbers to play.<br /><br />The problem is it still doesn t come in enough without being forced to use progressive wagering. However when doing the same system with both</p>]]></description>
			<category>LottoBuster</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/901049</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/901049</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Amazing Grace</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Base and mirror pairs only for reducing amount of combos.<br /><br />so 123= 12,13,23,67,68,78,<br /><br />so make consec combos with those pairs.<br /><br />so<br /><br />123,012,013,123,134,234,567,678,689,568,789,</p>]]></description>
			<category>Amazing Grace</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/900337</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952/900337</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LottoBuster</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tips, I might be able to work with this using different variations.<br /><br />Most of my systems have been with pairs because it s the easiest way of getting hits but they almost always involve progressive wagering schemes, which tend not to be profitable in the long run since the payout is so small. Once I come up with an effective filtering method that throws out the unlikely numbers to hit then it s off to the bank.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LottoBuster</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Capitalize on pairs.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Amazing Grace</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Although not throughly tested, and it does have dry runs, not often, works in most states tested, but you should back test in your state,<br /><br />And then you can put those pairs on your dinner plate.<br /><br />I tested at random, random states random spots in time here is Nebraska and how it works.<br /><br />Fri, Feb 17, 20063-8-0<br /><br />Thu, Feb 16, 20067-3-8<br /><br />Wed, Feb 15, 20065-8-7<br /><br />Tue, Feb 14, 20063-0-7<br /><br />Mon, Feb 13, 20065-6-2<br /><br />Sat, Feb 11, 20066-4-0<br /><br />Fri, Feb 10, 20065-3-2<br /><br />Thu, Feb 9, 20064-0-8... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/162952">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Amazing Grace</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

