Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 20, 2017, 7:00 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Capitalize on pairs.

Topic closed. 5 replies. Last post 9 years ago by Amazing Grace.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
rainbow lake
Canada
Member #25177
November 2, 2005
10764 Posts
Offline
Posted: September 18, 2007, 2:05 am - IP Logged

Although not throughly tested, and it does have dry runs, not often, works in most states tested, but you should back test in your state,

And then you can put those pairs on your dinner plate.

I tested at random, random states random spots in time here is Nebraska and how it works.

 

Fri, Feb 17, 20063-8-0
Thu, Feb 16, 20067-3-8
Wed, Feb 15, 20065-8-7
Tue, Feb 14, 20063-0-7
Mon, Feb 13, 20065-6-2
Sat, Feb 11, 20066-4-0
Fri, Feb 10, 20065-3-2
Thu, Feb 9, 20064-0-8
Wed, Feb 8, 20061-8-1
Tue, Feb 7, 20063-4-1
Mon, Feb 6, 20064-2-0
Sat, Feb 4, 20064-4-2
Fri, Feb 3, 20069-4-3
Thu, Feb 2, 20064-0-4
Wed, Feb 1, 20064-3-4
Tue, Jan 31, 20064-6-8
Mon, Jan 30, 20063-2-5
Sat, Jan 28, 20062-2-1
Fri, Jan 27, 20065-1-3
Thu, Jan 26, 20069-3-7
Wed, Jan 25, 20065-4-4
Tue, Jan 24, 20060-7-6

 

 

Lets start at 221 including that combo you count 5 draws back so you get to 076

now go one up in the middle so 086

now make pairs and mirror pairs, so 08,06,68,03,53,58,01,51,56,63,13,18

now from 221 being your last draw you have your pairs, most likely to hit,

 

Now take 408 count back 5 including that combo, you come to 442 so 452 add 1 to middle dont carry just wrap.

so 452= 45,42,52,40,90,95,47,97,92,42,57,52,02,07, most likely pairs, to follow

After 408 the next draws were.

 

Wed, Feb 15, 20065-8-7
Tue, Feb 14, 20063-0-7
Mon, Feb 13, 20065-6-2
Sat, Feb 11, 20066-4-0
Fri, Feb 10, 20065-3-2

 

And if you notice in most cases it was a consec pair that paired up!

Try it you might like it.Big Smile

Secret to $uccess=Law of Attraction

    Avatar

    United States
    Member #3222
    January 4, 2004
    80 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: September 19, 2007, 9:11 pm - IP Logged

    Thanks for the tips, I might be able to work with this using different variations.

    Most of my systems have been with pairs because it’s the easiest way of getting hits but they almost always involve progressive wagering schemes, which tend not to be profitable in the long run since the payout is so small. Once I come up with an effective filtering method that throws out the unlikely numbers to hit then it’s off to the bank. :)

      Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
      rainbow lake
      Canada
      Member #25177
      November 2, 2005
      10764 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: September 21, 2007, 2:52 am - IP Logged

      Base and mirror pairs only for reducing amount of combos.

      so 123= 12,13,23,67,68,78,

      so make consec combos with those pairs.

      so

      123,012,013,123,134,234,567,678,689,568,789,

      Secret to $uccess=Law of Attraction

        Avatar

        United States
        Member #3222
        January 4, 2004
        80 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: September 30, 2007, 11:34 pm - IP Logged

        Hi Amazing Grace, what I’ve been working on the last few months is a system with pairs that is based on creating variations from each days number. It’s kind of hard to explain but I’ve found a way to effectively filter out at least half of the 100 possible combinations as a starting point. After additional elimination I’ve got about 6 numbers to play.

        The problem is it still doesn’t come in enough without being forced to use progressive wagering. However when doing the same system with both sides of the number, for example the front and back pairs then combining them I’m ending up with only 10 to 15 straight numbers to play each day and that does appear to hit enough so there’s a consistent profit. I’m still back testing but so far it’s averaging 3 or more hits every 45 days and I've gone through the past 6 months.

        Not bad, I’d like to be able to do better and maybe with a little more work on it I can but I’ve always figured the best way to win in this game is through the use of pairs.&&

          Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
          rainbow lake
          Canada
          Member #25177
          November 2, 2005
          10764 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 1, 2007, 8:23 pm - IP Logged

          Hi Amazing Grace, what I’ve been working on the last few months is a system with pairs that is based on creating variations from each days number. It’s kind of hard to explain but I’ve found a way to effectively filter out at least half of the 100 possible combinations as a starting point. After additional elimination I’ve got about 6 numbers to play.

          The problem is it still doesn’t come in enough without being forced to use progressive wagering. However when doing the same system with both sides of the number, for example the front and back pairs then combining them I’m ending up with only 10 to 15 straight numbers to play each day and that does appear to hit enough so there’s a consistent profit. I’m still back testing but so far it’s averaging 3 or more hits every 45 days and I've gone through the past 6 months.

          Not bad, I’d like to be able to do better and maybe with a little more work on it I can but I’ve always figured the best way to win in this game is through the use of pairs.&&

          Excellent let me know how it fairs.

          In order for any system to work you need to have faith, once that is established

          the doors are open.

          Secret to $uccess=Law of Attraction

            Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
            rainbow lake
            Canada
            Member #25177
            November 2, 2005
            10764 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: October 30, 2007, 1:09 am - IP Logged

            Excellent let me know how it fairs.

            In order for any system to work you need to have faith, once that is established

            the doors are open.

            This method just keeps on producing in Wc i have used count backs 4,5,6 seems to work better, and can eliminate non wanted pairs with v-trac returns.

            Secret to $uccess=Law of Attraction