Conditional Feedback

Reply #32

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:12:17 GMT

For those of you voting yes, good for you. I'm glad to see you have the skills necessary to take advantage of a situation like this.

For those of you voting no, good for you, too. You can see that it's possible a computer system could potentially be avoiding certain number combinations that would render any knowledge of a bias to be useless.

Keep up the great work.

Reply #31

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:06:33 GMT

LOTTOMIKE,

Your instincts are right on target and you can use that to your advantage. Even though they may think they have the upper hand, they better think again. I'm working some other possibilities that I can not fully mention here, but it will be a shocker to say the least. Just keep in mind, document... document... document. You'll understand what I mean eventually.

Reply #30

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:53:45 GMT

thanks for your time and effort in all of this.the thing that really bothers me at this point in time is i think certain people in high positions of power are doing their best to get this fiasco swept under the rug here in tennessee.they want it to go away quickly and quietly.hell yes i do believe someone somewhere is guilty as hell and the key word to use here is fraud.but at this point in time i'm starting to wonder if the state is just going through the motions and acting like they are going... [ More ]

Reply #29

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:55:27 GMT

Back on 2007-10-28 @ 15:39 ET, I posted a modified graph that was presented at the beginning of a Lottery Post News story; the News post was Tenn. players picked up on new odds before lottery revealed glitch. In it I had shown a possible trigger date of Aug 6; since then I have decided on the date of Aug 8. The following graph is from that Lottery Post News story and will be necessary for part of the theories I'll write about next.

One of the theories I have been thinking about was the po... [ More ]

Reply #28

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:12:01 GMT

Once again, here are the wave files for each of the anomalies, their calculated average rate of reoccurrences and their reasonably expected wave files.

Actual Draw Anomaly SoundAverage Expected Reoccurrence RateCalibrated Random Sound

Cash 4 A missing 6-7-83.33 Draws333 millisecond

Cash 4 C-8-95 Draws500 millisecond

Cash 3 H-L-M6 Draws600 millisecond

Cash 4 Number 610 Draws1000 millisecond

At this point, someone might argue for each of the individual sounds that those could... [ More ]

Reply #27

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:09:14 GMT

The last two sounds to present are the 'A missing 6-7-8' anomaly for Cash 4 and the 'H-L-M' anomaly for Cash 3. The 'A missing 6-7-8' anomaly is the reoccurrence for the numbers 6, 7 and 8 in column A. The mathematically calculated rate of reoccurrence for that type of number selection is based on it's reciprocal probability of success of 3 / 10 and is 1 / (3 / 10) = 10 / 3 or approximately 3.33 draws. The 'H-L-M' anomaly is the reoccurrence of the particular type of possible permutation of the... [ More ]

Reply #26

JADELottery — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:50:27 GMT

Before we start, I need to add one more Calibrated Radiation Source, it's the 333 millisecond calibration and is relative to the lottery draw reoccurrence average rate of 3.33 draws. This will be used in another posted reply after this posted reply.

Up till now we heard the simulated and calibrated radiation sources. These sources are relative to their individual time or draw interval span and simulate the kind of random tick reoccurrences we should be hearing for a truly random event. The ne... [ More ]

Reply #25

JADELottery — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:10:26 GMT

At this point you most of you should have heard the simulated radioactive source sounds. This will help in understanding the next part of these postings. In order to present the final evidence, we need to transform the simulated radioactive source sounds into something more meaningful and relevant to the lottery drawings of the Cash 4 and Cash 3. The simulated radioactive sources each have an average time between ticks at some fairly reasonable time spans, 1 millisecond, 10 millisecond, 100 mill... [ More ]

Reply #24

JADELottery — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:04:30 GMT

Alright, I have spent the better part of the weekend studying the WAVE format. It is so I can present the next part of this topic. I won't get too technical, but we'll be in the realm of Quantum Mechanics, Radiation Physics and the application to random combinatorial selection. I've created some audio files to show the kind of inconsistencies there are in the drawings for 2007-07-28 to 2007-08-19 in Cash 4 and Cash 3.

First, let's deal with the Radiation. Most of us have heard of or listened... [ More ]

Reply #23

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:34:42 GMT

i haven't bought one ticket since.i won't play until they go back to balls.if they don't then i guess i won't ever again.thats why playing online is really the only fair option i have left......

Reply #22

GASMETERGUY — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:27:54 GMT

This is Tennessee. We have more politicians in jail than any other state (If this last sentence is not true, it ought to be).

I always said (prior to the lottory coming in) that Tennessee will get a lottery just as soon as the policticians find a way to skim money. With RNG they have found a way. The Feds will conduct a sting operation (the state won't do it) and all will be out in the open. The sting can't come soon enough for me.

I can only hope one lawmaker will introduce a bill f... [ More ]

Reply #21

JADELottery — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:08:55 GMT

Up till now in this topic, I have not used the F word to say for certain if some wrong doing has taken place or is still taking place, but as the evidence mounts, it sure is pointing in that direction.

Reply #20

konane — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:11:12 GMT

Might draw results have been tweaked by a programmer in the company performing drawings to bias drawings in favor of the lottery increasing revenues ....... showing lawmakers Hargrove's decision was correct? Of course not saying it happened that way but something to ponder.

More revenues ...... more pork to ensure re-election ..... politicians don't care how it was brought about.

Exactly what Hargrove is counting on.

Reply #19

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:26:42 GMT

i think there was fraud.someone very clever inside of the tennessee lottery got away with this.i think they were also very careful if they did win anything.

Reply #18

JADELottery — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:52:54 GMT

I have a few more points to present.... but I think if that reporter looked here at this posted topic, it's about a bundled as it could get. I have a few Quantum aspects of the anomalies to show that can kind of round things out. Also, I have a few plausible theories as to an explanation of what may have and could be going on now with the Computer Generated Numbers.

Reply #17

CARBOB — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:45:29 GMT

Doug,

What do you think about, bundleing up your analysis and sending it to that Tennessee reporter? Maybe she will rethink their analysis about fraud. I, for one, believe there was fraud. No idea at all who was involved, but one or more people committed it. Even if no one played any numbers, there was fraud, when they claimed they ran tests and got doubles.

Reply #16

JADELottery — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:50:46 GMT

Alright, here's some more. Looking back on the graphs I've posted, I had to ask myself, Which graph is more reasonable or what is the reasonable expectation for data samples like that? Well, there are no lotteries that select 4 non-repeating numbers from 0 to 9 in any order, so, I had to create one. Also, I ran 1500 samples of two different kind of draw sample sizes of 20 and 22 to see what I should get for a distribution. From there I could calculate for each distribution their averages and s... [ More ]

Reply #15

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:44:29 GMT

There's more to present, but I tired now... zzzzzz.

Reply #14

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:31:32 GMT

Below are some bar graphs of the distribution for the Before and After.

Before the suspected trigger date

On and After the suspected trigger date

You can see the dramatic shift in column, frequency and number.

Reply #13

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:48:18 GMT

Condition 3 is next, it's the absences of three numbers in a given column. The distribution shows that 6, 7 and 8 dropped out of column A near the suspect trigger date.

Before After

Indices 1 to 20Indices 21 to 42

NumberColumnNumberColumn

ABCDABCD

0222101214

1234114310

2321222522

3304136101

4120243211

5234252222

6222260008

7320370222

8130580570

9113194062

Here the numbers 6, 7 and 8 as they appear in the all the draws highlighted. Note what happen... [ More ]

Reply #12

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:30:38 GMT

Now we'll look at condition 2. The abnormally high selection of two numbers in a given column. Looking at the distribution table again for indices 21 to 42 in column C, there is a high number of 8 and 9 selections as compared to the before.

Before After

Indices 1 to 20Indices 21 to 42

NumberColumnNumberColumn

ABCDABCD

0222101214

1234114310

2321222522

3304136101

4120243211

5234252222

6222260008

7320370222

8130580570

9113194062

Here is how the numbe... [ More ]

Reply #11

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:18:08 GMT

As pointed out, there is a suspect trigger date that is common between Cash 3 and Cash 4, 2007-08-08 and the date is highlighted in the table.

The first bias we'll look at is condition 3. It's when one number only appears in one column. If we look at the distribution of numbers by columns A B C D for the indices of 1 to 20, there is a reasonable expected distribution of the numbers in each column. However, when compared to the distribution of numbers by column for the indices of 21 to 42 ther... [ More ]

Reply #10

JADELottery — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:39:24 GMT

Ok, here we go. Below are the drawings for Tennessee Cash 4 Midday and Evening drawings in their proper data stream order. We'll look at the biasing conditions stated at the beginning of this topic. As we go along, keep in mind the Cash 3 drawings, the H-L-M bias and the suspect trigger date pointed out earlier for Cash 3. There is too much to post all at once, so I do this in chunks. Review the list of draws as follows:

Tennessee Cash 4 Midday and Evening

IndexDateTimeDraws

YearMonthDa... [ More ]

Reply #9

JADELottery — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:07:11 GMT

The Cash 3 is what started this. Below is the Cash 3 drawings put in proper data stream order as they occurred relative to each other's draw. I've highlighted the H-L-M draws to show where they are in the data stream. Probability states that on average the number of occurrences for that specific type of draw, given the fact that none are repeating and can be in any order, should be drawn about 42 *(1 / 6) = 7 times. Statically also, the approximate standard deviation for that type of draw should... [ More ]

Reply #8

time*treat — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:33:42 GMT

I think this is the basic motivating theory for those who try to build systems.

Just hunting for the bias ... like Elmer Fudd hunting wabbits.

Reply #7

Yukio — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:27:00 GMT

I am not sure about the troughts of this.

It seems obvious that there was this 'anomalous' process, after all a anomaly could be verified after 20 draws. Some people use analysis after 10 draws, but it should not be considered long enoug. The normal analyzes seems to use 20-25 games (cards, dices, lotto) or 3 weeks (for daily games) ... If after the end of this period the (positive) payout (or payback in this particular case) would be verified to seek for anomalies.

Now, are people interes... [ More ]

Reply #6

CARBOB — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:28:01 GMT

A very big edge for Play 4, Cash 3, Katie, bar the door!!! Takeout second mortgage

Reply #5

RJOh — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:59:37 GMT

Lottery data always have patterns that are bias for a few drawings and can be described as an anomaly only because they have never been noticed before but by the time they are confirmed it's usually too late to be of any advantage.

If a pattern continues longer than a few drawings then the drawings aren't truly random as was the case in the Tennessee pick3/4 drawings after they first started using computer generated numbers which prevented duplicates coming up in August. That pattern exist... [ More ]

Reply #4

WIN D — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:49 GMT

Wonderful that you can attempt such things ET .

Anomaly recognition method for data streams

Document Type and Number:

United States Patent 20050143976

Kind Code:

A1

Link to this page:

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20050143976.html

Abstract:

This invention identifies anomalies in a data stream, without prior training, by measuring the difficulty in finding similarities between neighbourhoods in the ordered sequence of elements. Data elements in an area tha... [ More ]

Reply #3

JADELottery — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:43:57 GMT

WIN D,

I've spotted a few anomalies and interesting patterns within the dates of 2007-08-08 to 2007-08-19 for Cash 4 Midday and Evening drawings. They are subtle but detectable. This is similar to the anomaly I found in the Cash 3 drawing for about the same dates. It almost appears like there was a trigger date programmed in for 2007-08-08. I'm working some of the patterns and inconsistencies that appear to be present in the Cash 4.

Reply #2

WIN D — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:36:51 GMT

My little Earth-Ling brain starting over heating when the odds dropped by about 90%... LOL

Not use to thinking Pick 4 but..... is the advantage very much more than that Jade?

Could it be .... almost all the way

Reply #1

spy153 — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:22:54 GMT

yes

Conditional Feedback

JADELottery — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:51:05 GMT

I'm creating this poll to get some feedback on what the Lottery Post Community's take is on this. Yes, this is related to the Tennessee Cash 4 drawings for 2007-08-08 to 2007-08-19. Basically it goes something like this, the question is: Would you have an advantage if you knew some basic biasing conditions the draw process would follow?

Below are three conditions that would all occur within the same set of draws.

1. One of the columns in the draw does not pick a set of three numbers.... [ More ]