S, +1, +2 method inquiry

Reply #5

RJOh — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:10:44 GMT

I've read of some players doing something like that with their pick3/4 numbers selections but never with a pick5 of jackpot style game. It makes sense for those games because each digit can only be one of ten and S, S 1 and S 2 would cover half of them. For a pick5 game that would cover 3^5 or 243 combinations.

You might test a few lines on a pick5 type game and see what happens. With a pick6 game like West Virgina's Cash25 with only 25 numbers, something like that might work also.... [ More ]

Reply #4

CountingMan — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:00:06 GMT

Todd, KY Floyd:

Thanks for the responses.

As to were I had seen it, I had read something on this site, or another (inferior, of coarse) site about it.

I am a visual guy, with self developed sheets that lay out the drawings based on how the numbers hit. What I have seen, is that numbers appear to track in certain directions, and even cluster at times. So, I can see how the principles within this theory works. I am not a numerology guy; I don't know that much about it. I'm not... [ More ]

Reply #3

KY Floyd — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:51:30 GMT

I'd think an approach based on numerology would come up with something different than simply adding 1 and 2 to every number. This sounds like an argument I've seen many times, which is that it's not unusual for some numbers in one drawing to be close to some numbers in a previous drawing. I would guess the author's perspective is that some people will pay money for the system. Of course, if you pick the 2 numbers above and below all the numbers in a pick 5 game you'll end up with 20 numbers,... [ More ]

Reply #2

Todd — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:58:08 GMT

I have not heard of that system -- where did you see it?

What is the system author's perspective as to why adding 1 and 2 to previous number could possibly help?

To me, it seems like a numerology approach, which is fine if numerology is your thing, but I'm not sure I see logic in reducing odds by doing it.

Reply #1

CountingMan — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:09:28 GMT

Wow!!!! After 4 days, many viewings, and no responses? Did I hit on something that no one wants to discuss, or does everyone not know enough about the topic to put their keyboard into action?

_________________________________________________________________________________

The answer is always no, until the question in asked.

S, +1, +2 method inquiry

CountingMan — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:37:53 GMT

Good Morning Readers,

Am looking for some information on the S, +1, +2 method. I have read a little about it in the postings and I am hoping this discussion can enlighten myself, as well as some other who may be new to the site.

My understanding of the theory is that you use the last drawing as your starting point (S= same numbers drawn), and then use this number, as well as S+1 and S+2 for wheeling for the next drawing. From what I have read, it is said that these numbers are good for... [ More ]