No Box players allowed// LOL

Reply #15

CARBOB — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:13:13 GMT

Using this theory on Fla 2/21/08 for the FP would have brought you a winner in last nights draw, 882. I know this is hind sight, but this theory will get hits. I'm not sure if it's consistent enough for a profit.

OUTPUT DATA:

Priority: 1

212 - 213 - 215 - 216 - 217 - 218 - 219 - 422 - 423 - 532 - 372 - 424 - 425 - 426 - 427 - 428 - 582 - 882

Priority: 2

402, 420 - 214, 421 - 429, 942

Reply #14

sully818 — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:04:15 GMT

CARBOB, PAC and WIN D you guys do some good work. I certanily appreciate all of your input and ideas.

Reply #13

CARBOB — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:15:12 GMT

Going to give this a shot for Fla 2/20/08. Removing pairs from last 65 draws,FP,SP,BP. The 50/50 split is @65.

Left with

OUTPUT DATA:

Priority: 1

302 - 240 - 802 - 217 - 325 - 823 - 425 - 427 - 265 - 725 - 267 - 862 - 827 - 829

Priority: 2

062, 260 - 072, 720 - 342, 423 - 362, 632 - 392, 932 - 249, 942 - 269, 962 - 297, 972

Priority: 3

327, 372, 723

Priority: 4

029, 092, 290, 902

No. of Results : 37

No. of Selections: 24

Reply #12

CARBOB — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:06:12 GMT

Chaz , Pac

This could be a powerful 50/50 filter. tHE ACTUAL 50/50 WILL BE BETWEEN 65 AND 70 DRAWS.

80 DRAW REPEATS SKIPS 2 3

0 3203 2.25 0 5 4

1 3999 1.80 1 1 1

7202

44%

70 DRAW REPEATS SKIPS 2 3

0 3522 2.04 0 5 4

1 3680 1.96 1 1 1

7202

49%

These are the results before yesterday's draw. Reduced by BP .

No. of Results : 344

No. of Selections: 118

Reply #11

gsc5 — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:55:13 GMT

I am curious, if you were to play 100 numbers straight only, over the last 10

days. What would your profit had been (p/3).

Reply #10

fbird — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:03:17 GMT

you both may have hit on something...mich...midday there were a few repeat back pair ..but evening there was not....then how about taking it a few steps further and look at front pairs and pairs in the 1-3 positions in str form ....may help reduce the list further... mich evening did well in that regard as well...thanks for the great input

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:48:13 GMT

Yeah Win D, we'll have to figure it down to just one ore two back pairs. Hopefully only one.

I would suggest doing the below 50 and above 50 overdue for the back pairs, and then reducing those 50 down to one. Easier said than done I know.

Reply #8

WIN D — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:26:04 GMT

Ga Midday for Saturday 504

The o4 straight pair had not been hit for the last 60 or so draws. Last seen back in Nov07

5 04

4 91 We could have subtracted about 50 or 60 straight pairs from the 100 pairs chart and still won. Straight !

Also notice we did not get any digits to return next draw in same postion as the draw before.

Reply #7

WIN D — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:39:04 GMT

Good example for Ga EVE.

802 last night

916 tonight. 9 16

Fri, Feb 15, 2008 Georgia Cash 3 9-1-6

Mon, Dec 17, 2007 Georgia Cash 3 4-1-6

Clearly we could have subtracted almost 60 straight back pairs .....safely. It would certainly worked subtracting 50 back pairs. Throw in a couple other filters and the straights numbers would have been manageable.

Reply #6

WIN D — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:32:06 GMT

The results are in for Ga Midday experiment.

Yesterdays draw was 456 ..... now todays number was 491

We could have subtracted every straight pair from our back pair choice list going all the way back to last month ....Jan 15th. actually. Before we would have hit a repeating back pair.

From the 100 straight back pairs to consider .... we could have gone back and subtracted almost a whole month's worth of back pairs. Pretty strong filter !

We REALLY DO need to do the math and con... [ More ]

Reply #5

WIN D — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:32:33 GMT

Went back on GA eve's draw last night which was ........... 8 02

Surprise again... we could have subtracted all the previously hit back pairs going back to last month and been safe! This is interesting.

Thu, Feb 14, 2008 Georgia Cash 3 8-0-2

Tue, Jan 15, 2008 Georgia Cash 3 3-0-2

I am very curious ..... How many pairs can we go back and subtract .....and be safe for todays up coming draw? Hmmmm .. let's just see about this.

Reply #4

WIN D — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:04:04 GMT

Hello pacattack05 ! I always enjoy looking at that 100 % first position list you do.....and think to myself .... I have try that for awhile. Always get side tracked.... but I'm gonna play around with it now.

Hmmm..... Say, the last time I saw that it occurred to me that we could cut down on that last or back pair choice. If, we looked back 10 or 20 draws and noted the back pairs that hit.....and Subtracted those from our pair choices (for the next draw) it would work most of the time.

D... [ More ]

Reply #3

WIN D — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:47:12 GMT

Your welcome jackpotismine. Str8 takes more faith in the future than Boxes ..... more money too but worth it in the long run.

Reply #2

jackpotismine — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:47:04 GMT

Thanks for the tip. I only like to play str8

Reply #1

pacattack05 — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:59:36 GMT

720? Is that the best you can do?....lol

How about using your system to bring the 1000 chart down to 81...yes 81.

Let's say 012 came in last night and we don't play the 012 in their respective positions, like your system suggests.

All you have to do is write 1-9 vertically on a sheet of paper for the first column. One of those numbers have to come out right? Considering the 0 dosen't come out because we don't want it to.

Then just pick any 2 numbers you think will be the back pair, b... [ More ]

No Box players allowed// LOL

WIN D — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:29:14 GMT

No Box players allowed ... LOL

Just kidding. However, this system is pretty much for Straight Players ....at least on the surface.

If you still want to play Str/Box it might just help enough to score a Straight hit every once in awhile. It's really very simple....

It's a method to filter out over 27% of the possible numbers each draw.

How to filter out -271 numbers from the 1000 chart each time?

Easy ....just don't ever play the same digits in the same position th... [ More ]