...another discovery about lottery numbers

Reply #61

RJOh — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:25:04 GMT

It's not an official Lottery Post disclaimer, but I think players should remember it because many players forget that LP is a fun place where anyone can post their ideas for playing lotteries and it doesn't have to be researched or proved.

Reply #60

LottoL — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:55:37 GMT

I'll try it again. My 30 MM picks for Tuesday, July 22 with my best picks highlighted in red.

Underlined numbers indicate repeat numbers (I wouldn't pick more than 2 of these, if any)

01 - 03 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 17 - 19 - 20 - 23

24 - 27 - 29 - 33 - 34 - 36 - 37 - 39 - 40 - 42 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 51 - 55

Good Luck!

LottoL

Reply #59

LottoL — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:23:25 GMT

I would say that's pretty darn good!

Best Of Luck Next Time.

LottoL

Reply #58

RJOh — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:48:37 GMT

39 numbers: 01 03 04 07 09 11 12 13 15 17 20 24 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56

I was able to reduce those 39 numbers to 31 without eliminating the 17,36 and 55 , played 20 lines and got a 3+0 and a 0+1 for $9. I'll be going through the same steps of my system for Tuesday's drawing and hoping to do better.

Put 12 of my WB and 4 of my MB in the Maddog challenge and got a 1+1.

Reply #57

RJOh — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:11:50 GMT

You're right, those are a lot of numbers, but they are the initial list which will be reduced to 30 of less eventually.

In addition, when I create my combinations from them, I will use the most popular distribution patterns. For example I've replaced numbers in the last 320 drawings with the letters A=1-19, B=20-38 and C=39-56 and found only 19 distribution patterns and 65% of the combinations were cover by six of them. All the combinations that I play will fit one of those top six patterns.... [ More ]

Reply #56

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:23:09 GMT

That's ALOT of numbers, dude. If it suits you, so be it though. I narrow my numbers for each columns down to 1 or 2 numbers. Sometimes I might have to play 3 different numbers for one particular column. Overall, my pool of numbers rarely goes over 10 numbers (excluding the MM ball).

Reply #55

RJOh — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:47:26 GMT

To get my initial list of numbers I look at the number of times the winning numbers have hit in the previous 50 drawings since the last matrix change. 60% of them have hit 3-6 times and 15% of the time all 5 winning numbers were within that group.

Using that statistic I start out with a group of 39 numbers: 01 03 04 07 09 11 12 13 15 17 20 24 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56. This list is larger than I like so I will be doing some additional ana... [ More ]

Reply #54

LottoL — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:34:56 GMT

I agree with RJOh!!

Based on my system, I would venture a guess that I may capture 3, and hopefully

4 winning numbers out of a set of 30 for Friday's July 18 MegaMillions drawing.

Here is my 30 number set (not in any particular order):

01 - 02 - 04 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 13 - 14 - 16 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25

26 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 35 - 36 - 38 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 51 - 52 - 54 - 55

In the last 10 MM drawings, repeat numbers have hit in 8 of these draws, with

two drawings contai... [ More ]

Reply #53

Stack47 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:03:28 GMT

Like johnph77, I and others post information and charts that are not systems or strategies and it's up to the readers to decide if the information is helpful.

I have a LP file in Word I copied and paste with many ideas, theories, and information from this site and I've tried many things that might combine 5 or 6 of them. It's almost like some of the new people expect to find a system on LP where they do a few things, play $2 or $3 worth of tickets, and collect the jackpot the next day.

Fr... [ More ]

Reply #52

RJOh — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:47:37 GMT

I am not against anyone using any methods to win these games but let be realistic about it.

Lets be realistic, if you're going to play then you're going to have to pick your own combinations or let the terminal do it for you (quick picks). If you pick your own then that's a system whether you use dates of births or important events in your life or something else. Chances are the combinations you pick won't win the jackpot but giving it your best try is better than wishing you had after t... [ More ]

Reply #51

Guru101 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:43:25 GMT

You can use the randomness to your advantage. In fact, my entire system is based on that.

Reply #50

Stack47 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:26:10 GMT

In the last 9 Mega Millions drawings, $170,960,727 worth of tickets were sold and estimated cash jackpot for the next drawing is $64.3 million. And that number is base on expected sales of another $25 to $30 million on the next drawing. After subtracting the approximate number of secondary prizes from the $132.5 million if the jackpot is hit, gives us an ballpark figure of how much the game will profit and it should be at least $60 million.

It's possible a couple of tickets were sold in one... [ More ]

Reply #49

four4me — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:04:06 GMT

Jap thats kinda what i was getting at the other day i watched Maryland's pick 3 drawing on the Internet they drew the 3 balls and when they did the number 6 was all beat up like the paint was missing from some areas where the black 6 was the other two balls looked new or nearly new. So i asked myself why on earth would they put a used ball in with newer balls. Probably because they needed a ball that weighed the same as the other within the specs and didn't have a newer one handy or got it from... [ More ]

Reply #48

JAP69 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:22:27 GMT

Did any one ever inquire about this one.

If they have say four ball sets numbered 1 thru whatever. Now take all four ball sets place them in a drum and twirl them around mixing them up.

Now take out the four sets of balls in the drum to remake your four numbered ball sets 1 thru whatever.

Reply #47

Guru101 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:06:10 GMT

The Lottery official that responded to me, answered my question and onthe last question (about changing the ball and the lead on them) shedidn't know what the hell I was talking about.

The 56 ball obviously weighs more than the 1 ball because there is more black paint used for the number itself for the 56 ball than the 1 ball. Those cheaters!................................

Reply #46

Stack47 — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:22:45 GMT

I decided to email Mega Million and question them about changing the ball and the amount of lead on the ball that may tilt the numbers differently than if they hadn't use a ball with more lead.

I have plastic shaker device that holds 54 small numbered balls with slots on the base that trap 6 of balls. It's shaped and painted to look like Santa Claus and has gold colored string so it can double as a Christmas tree ornament. It didn't come with instructions but it's obvious the idea is shake i... [ More ]

Reply #45

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:45:28 GMT

Four4me,

Believe me, I used to think the same way as you. So one day (recently, actually) I decided to email Mega Million and question them about changing the ball and the amount of lead on the ball that may tilt the numbers differently than if they hadn't use a ball with more lead. I asked some other questions too.

The Lottery official that responded to me, answered my question and on the last question (about changing the ball and the lead on them) she didn't know what the hell I was... [ More ]

Reply #44

four4me — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:54:23 GMT

The people who run these games aren't stupid they know people will devise many methods to try and win their games. However because they change the ball sets for every drawing how can anyone possible defeat that without having and using that information in their systems.

They change the balls sets to avoid a common occurrence of balls being drawn. If they used the same ball set for every draw then i think it would be possible to possibly trap the numbers once using some system.

How can you... [ More ]

Reply #43

RJOh — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:09:57 GMT

Many new players come to LP hoping someone or a group have developed a system or strategy that wins big and are willing to convince them that it really works. Unfortunately, that's what people who are trying to sell something do, information as LP is shared freely as is.

The pick3 and pick4 forums are more active in that regards and the pick5 and jackpot forums have their supporters too but they haven't developed a consensus on what works. Like johnph77, I and others post information and char... [ More ]

Reply #42

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:58:46 GMT

Brilliant, dude!

I can honestly say you're a real student of the game. I can see how deep you're playing just from what you already know. Unbelievable.

Reply #41

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:39:04 GMT

Thanks for understanding. I was beginning to wonder how alone I am in the community. I agree with every single word you said. I see the community for what it is....and I made other posts about newcomers ( like yourself and I) that comes here and get pelted by the established members, resulting in those newcomers not wanting to contributing anything insigthful to the community.

I talked about it with Todd a couple times and it seems like I have to fight him with words when I only want to make

Reply #40

LottoL — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:05:55 GMT

Mega-ThinkTank,

I got to agree with you as far as your pattern analysis goes.

I use a pattern analysis based on an occurrence matrix I developed.

I cross reference this with statistical methods to try to come up with

an ideal set of approximately ten numbers for the mega-million draw.

(extremely difficult to capture five winning numbers this way)

There are definite patterns that I have come across that are extremely

helpful in narrowing down the field to between (on average

Reply #39

Editgap — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:50:47 GMT

I agree with you 1000%.

Do not get fustrated. We have gotten old on this site. Sometimes I feel they don't get it or choose not to see it.

They tell you to post on maddog's challenge and you will be happy. But what is the point in that.

There is an element of secrecy whether intensional or not. That is why if you discovered something you would be reluctant to post it too.

But it is no secret a lot of people wouldn't tell others here if they won or not. You can imagine sharing their b... [ More ]

Reply #38

JKING — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:01:16 GMT

yaddy, yaddy, yaddy.

All talk and no system. Or should I say...All talk and no walk.

Maybe others here an help. Or give a different perspective that will assist you.

But, with no details, nothing but fustration on everyones part. *S

Reply #37

four4me — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:35:21 GMT

No matter how people have devised their strategy for winning jackpot games no theory is useless be it statistical or mathematical. Many of us doubt that mathematics can be applied to the lottery jackpot games but there are some who do.

An algorithm is a repetitious mathematical approach.

Statistical analysis is an ongoing work in progress.

To each his own.

A system no mater what it is needs only to work one time for me to be satisfied. Especially if that system generates all the winn... [ More ]

Reply #36

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:13:58 GMT

Johnny, Rjoh, Four4me, and Stack,

Thanks for the information (statistical charts). I've been mistaken here. I really thought you guys do studies that goes deeper than statistical charts. Not that it's a bad thing but, realistically, how can those charts help a player pick 1 or 2 or 3 numbers for each columns? If you look at the chart from JKing, column one shows numbers from 1-10 playing 244962 times -- I mean, how can one take that information and figure which number out of the ten can... [ More ]

Reply #35

JKING — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:09:01 GMT

OCCURENCE TABLES

1 GAME DISTRIBUTION OVER 100 GAMES

1 2 3 4 5

0 100 100 100 100 78

1 22

2 GAME DISTRIBUTION OVER 100 GAMES

1 2 3 4 5

0 100 100 98 85 50

1 2 15 48

2 2

3 GAME DISTRIBUTION OVER 100 GAMES

1 2 3 4 5

0 100 100 96 69 24

1 0 4 31 72

2 4

3

4 GAME DISTRIBUTION OVER 100 GAMES

1 2 3 4 5

0 100 100 88 47 13

1 12 52 74

2 1 13

3

4

5 GAME DISTRIBUTION OV... [ More ]

Reply #34

JKING — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:41:24 GMT

DECADES POSITIONAL DISTRIBUTIONS

RANGE 1 2 3 4 5

1-10 2449062 817212 134112 9912 252

11-20 993762 1447512 774012 180012 15252

21-30 311212 1040812 1266412 665112 127002

31-40 61412 437112 1131312 1265212 515502

41-50 4362 76412 488712 1380312 1460752

51-56 6 756 25256 319256 1701056

3819816 3819816 3819816 3819816 3819816

Reply #33

Stack47 — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:28 GMT

The chart RJ supplied shows that 50% of the MM numbers in the first position are between 1 to 14, 50% in the second position are from 9 to 25, and 50% in the other three positions are 18 to 37, 25 to 46, and 47 to 56. That's a 83% reduction and adding other standard filters like 2 or 3 even numbers and 2 or 3 low numbers, reduces the field by 90.2%; I would hardly call that insignificant insight .

I know why it's hard to just come out and share but there's an email feature on L.P. and we can... [ More ]

Reply #32

four4me — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:29:22 GMT

I don't just chose my selections from inner space i study the game, keep excel files, track the game, keep records, use the statistical analysis from mega million site Todd has created.

I usually put my plan into action when the pot gets to around 200 million. I wheel my numbers i got the wheel from another poster. I sometimes modify the wheels numbers after it's created giving me a varied number selection. The wheel could cost anywhere from 12 to 56 bucks depending on which wheel i use and h... [ More ]

Reply #31

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:57:32 GMT

If you need the numbers for column 3 and 4, I can give you the end numbers to the whole numbers. Two of them will be high numbers and two of them will be low numbers, you'd have to take your pick.

Reply #30

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:37:59 GMT

My weakness is a lack of strength in my method to pick the first number in a whole number. I don't do wheeling...just purely on methods that derives purely from the Lottery matrix of Mega Million. Any suggestions

Reply #29

Todd — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:29:05 GMT

I too bent over backwards to explain how you can find the info you're looking for, and you either didn't read it or just ignored it. I am referring to the similar request you posted in the Suggestions forum.

Lottery Post is a community where people discuss things. If you have a question, you ask it. Tens of thousands of newbie players have gotten their questions answered just fine.

If Lottery Post was a newbie's guide to the lottery then it would not really strike a chord with seasoned pla... [ More ]

Reply #28

RJOh — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:08:08 GMT

Mega-ThinkTank, you are going to be disappointed if you're waiting for other members to contract you by email to give you ideas. What reason would they have to do that? Those interested in sharing their ideas will post them for everyone to read, this is what I've done in the past and will continue to do when ever I have something worth posting.

That team concept has been bought up before and it has never gone any where because players working on their own system aren't interested working on/f... [ More ]

Reply #27

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:57:36 GMT

Todd,

I'm bending over backward to forge a working relationship with you, dude. If I'm saying something that you totally disagree with, that's fine but you have a lot of newcomers coming in and not right away finding what they looking for.

They're just like me when I first came: the inquiring minds wants to know. A lot of the newcomers are asking the same questions -- how do I know when a number will play?, what are ways to increase my chances of winning?, when is a number due to play?, ar... [ More ]

Reply #26

time*treat — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:34:33 GMT

Significance is subjective. The members most pleased with the answers they get tend to ask the question in a way some of us can understand what that person wants.

example:Excel question - I'm stuck

Note that the question came from a new member, not one of the -alleged- clique, and the turnaround period was less than 12hrs. Who is sitting back?

Lotto systems are usually too big to just randomly throw a new one over the wall every few days, but parts are available cheap.

Reply #25

JKING — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:56:53 GMT

DIVISIBILITY GRID FOR MM. How many times a combination is divisible by a multiplier.

MULTIPLIER PRIMES

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0 98280 501942 850668 1221759 1533939 1712304 1906884 2118760 2349060 575757

1 573300 1328670 1567020 1638945 1605285 1556640 1483132 1381800 1249500 1316016

2 1238328 1290708 1044680 780450 583740 484288 386904 294000 208250 1178931

3 1238328 573648 313404 163350 90804 63168 41160 24500 12750 561184

4 573300 116280 42024 14850 5922 3360 171... [ More ]

Reply #24

four4me — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:53:45 GMT

column 1-2 and 5 are the key columns. A lot of us know that. Sticking with those columns and finding the numbers for column 3 and 4 is the problem at hand.

If for instance you have noted over time that 3 numbers have appeared in more drawings than not then wheel the left over numbers in column 3-4 it could get expensive but to win a jackpot or match all 5 white balls is the goal.

It would almost be the same thing if you just played all the hottest numbers and eliminated the rest.

How m... [ More ]

Reply #23

Todd — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:13:59 GMT

Yes, I can see how, with the 60 posts you made in the 4 weeks since you've been here, you've got us all pegged as a group of secretive people who post 95% junk and 2% quality posts.

I'm wondering why you're bothering to stay here at all with such an abysmal forum and members.

I'd appreciate if you would kindly post the link to the awesome lottery site where everyone is winning jackpots and every members posts a new system every week.

Or, maybe you can point me to the plethora of systems... [ More ]

Reply #22

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:00:27 GMT

Dude, if you share your possible significant insight, I will do the same. I hope others will come forward to share what they know too.

There's a lot of good minds on L.P. but none of them are actually coming out and sharing what they know. Todd, of course, would disagree with me and I gave him the benefit of the doubt and research countless of pages of history on this site and I just don't see any outpouring of significant information that engage, in the mode of BobP (he actually illustrated... [ More ]

Reply #21

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:38:08 GMT

cRaZy OnE,

If it was off my hype that you finally played on Maddog Mega Million Challenge ---- YOU WELCOMEEEEEEEEE.

P.S. (Of course you wasn't planning on thanking me for motivating you to join in on the Challenge).

............and don't worry about steppin' in yo own poop, you STINK.

Reply #20

psykomo — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:03:09 GMT

TT(no SHOW):

ON 07/08/000000000000002008 ???????????????????????????

NO (LOSS) to anyone on MadDog !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BUTT ??????????????? IF and this is only A ?????????

IF U DON't HAVE ANY #############################

WHAT R ???? UR LIE'ssss

PSYKO posted BECAUSE, I RESPECT the LOTTERY POST!!!!!

BUTT ????????????and there is ALWAY's A BUTT LIKE YOU !

WHERE were UR ####################'S

I take PLEASURE in cram'g my ###########'S

DOWN UR HYPE... [ More ]

Reply #19

RJOh — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:21:10 GMT

I think I've noticed something else about lottery numbers, at least I noticed it in the numbers I picked for my Ohio Classic Lotto tonight. I will check to see it if also applies to MegaMillion tomorrow night. Right now it's not worth mentioning until further study proves otherwise.

Reply #18

Todd — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:56:46 GMT

Reply #17

RJOh — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:06:50 GMT

I see the problem you two are having, you're talking about two similar but different games. The thread started out about MegaMillions and now it's about PowerBall. I've noticed before that the two games have their own unique patterns, you can't study one and apply all of what you learn to the other.

Reply #16

Mega-ThinkTank — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:46:45 GMT

Column One would be: 02 (and the numbers down the list in that row)

Column Two would be: 12 (same thing)

Column Three would be: 20 (same thing)

Column Four would be : 22 (same thing)

Column Five would be: 50 (same thing)

And there's the Mega ball (same thing)

________________________________

The point I'm making is that Column 1-3 shows similar patterns in the numbers. Columns 4 and 5 shows a different view as I explain in greater details.

Reply #15

Guru101 — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:31:36 GMT

Ok, let me try to understand what you're saying. Here's the last 4 Powerball drawing results:

Draw Date Powerball

7/12/2008 2 12 20 22 50 17

x 2

7/9/2008 5 7 31 49 53 14

x 4

7/5/2008 1 24 34 47 48 18

x 5

7/2/2008 4 33 46 48 52 17

x 5

So 2, 5, 1, and 4 are in column 1 right? Please explain.

Reply #14

Mega-ThinkTank — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:24:29 GMT

Nooooo Guru!

Listen, 1-3 represent the columns. Not the numbers....or you can say the positions: Postion 1, Position 2, Position 3, Position 4, and Position 5.

I call them columns. When I say column 1-3, I meant the Positions 1-3.

Reply #13

Guru101 — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:20:49 GMT

I don't understand why you're comparing a pattern for a subset of 3 numbers(1-3), to a pattern for a subset of 2 different numbers(4-5). Why not compare 1-3 and 3-5

Reply #12

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:57:41 GMT

Okay....I see there's a lot of confusion by what I meant by using methods or systems. I will substitute method for patterns -- that should clarify the picture.

The patterns in column 1-3 runs differently in column 4 and 5....and you right, the Mega Ball is chosen from a different pool of numbers.

When I look at patterns in column 1-3, I see the same similarities. When I look at patterns in columns 4 and 5, it's different. How? For example, let's say the patterns in 1-3 are defined as 3 hi... [ More ]

Reply #11

Guru101 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:37:21 GMT

Column 4,5 and Mega Ball are not compatible with the same method or system for columns 1-3. That's my point.

That's obvious since the Mega Ball is chosen from a different pool of numbers. You also don't have to apply the method to just a subset of columns(for example, columns 1-3); it can be applied to the entire set. Also, a single method should be used on numbers that are in the same pool.

Reply #10

time*treat — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:13:01 GMT

The front end is fixed ... and the back end wags around like the tail on a dog.

Reply #9

Guru101 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:32:53 GMT

The official Lottery Post disclaimer.

Reply #8

RJOh — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:07:30 GMT

The information here is for informational and entertainment purposes only. As in any game of chance, there is the risk of losing money and when playing you assume all risk, liabilities and damages which may arise out of its use.

Reply #7

RJOh — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:09:05 GMT

There has been 319 MegaMillions drawings since the last matrix change.

06/24/05 TO 07/11/08 319 RECORDS ALL POSITIONS

1: 25 11: 21 21: 25 31: 31 41: 23 51: 32

2: 25 12: 34 22: 30 32: 27 42: 32 52: 31

3: 26 13: 30 23: 21 33: 25 43: 34 53: 40

4: 25 14: 39 24: 34 34: 21 44: 30 54: 33

5: 39 15: 22 25: 37 35: 28 45: 26 55: 25

6: 20 16: 28 26: 27 36: 35 46: 38 56: 29

7: 36 17: 28 27: 26 37: 22 47: 18 57: 0

8: 30 18: 29 28: 23 38: 28 48: 35 58: 0

9: 28 19: 23 29: 23 39

Reply #6

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:54:38 GMT

Thanks for the information but this statistical is irrevelant to the point I'm making. I'm talking here, methods or systems.

If one is using a workable method or system, there's evidence throughout the lottery matrix (by observation of patterns and depending how you view patterns) that columns 1-3 works to a compatible result. When approaching it the same way for column 4 and 5 and the Mega Ball, the result comes out different or wrong.

I don't want to say the numbers are wrong but when... [ More ]

Reply #5

tntea — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:37:16 GMT

Very interesting... Thanks

Reply #4

Raven62 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:11:38 GMT

Maybe this will clear it up: 341055 x 56 = 19,099,080 / 5 = 3,819,816 x 46 = 175,711,536

Reply #3

johnph77 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:49:13 GMT

My bad.

For Column 1 read Column A.

For Column 2 read Column B.

For Column 3 read Column C.

For Column 4 read Column D.

For Column 5 read Column E.

The numbers represent the frequency each number will appear in each column should all possible draws be listed.

Reply #2

Guru101 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:19:20 GMT

What do the numbers in those columns represent? EXPLAIN. When you say Column 1 I have no idea what you're talking about.

Reply #1

johnph77 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:42:08 GMT

Statistical expected position frequency chart for 5/56 matrix:

A B C D E Total

1 341055 341055

2 316251 24804 341055

3 292825 46852 1378 341055

4 270725 66300 3978 52 341055

5 249900 83300 7650 204 1 341055

6 230300 98000 12250 500 5 341055

7 211876 110544 17640 980 15 341055

8 194580 121072 23688 1680 35 341055

9 178365 129720 30268 2632 70 341055

10 163185 136620 37260 3864 126 341055

11 148995 141900 44550 5400 210 341055

...another discovery about lottery numbers

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:16:10 GMT

If you're the type of player that looks for patterns in the numbers (Mega Million), column 1-3 works the same in a system or a method.

Column 4 and 5 almost, always goes opposite or totally different. To try your method or system in the same manner for column 1-3, ends up giving questionable results. Be aware of that --- it's not that your method or system is useless. Column 4 and 5 and the Mega Ball have the highest odds therefore it requires a system or method different from the way you app... [ More ]