Hello Jackpot Games players ...like your opinion

Reply #8

WIN D — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:29:03 GMT

Then again.....

With almost Half the last digits in Pick 5 being Low ..... 20

01 02 03 04 05 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 31 32 33 34 35

The other half being HIGH digit .... this is surely a 50/50 filter at the very least

.....according to probability that HIGH Group Half on the 8th or 9th draw was imminent !

Think I'm going to look at something using the first 3 numbers in pick 5 .... last digits only ...as if they were Pick 3 and see if my hunch is r... [ More ]

Reply #7

WIN D — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:42:34 GMT

I think the way I am looking at strings ....at least for P3 may be different.

For example... using the draws just up there to demo part of the idea. Notice just the first position each draw up until Wed 7/1/98

I would say there is an ongoing String right there .....just in first position each day. Look..... every single draw had a LOW digit in its last spot for 10 straight draws ..... before it finally Stopped ..and went high digit on the end..... Wednesday ... starting with 09 ...

Reply #6

time*treat — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:17:04 GMT

Your strings are defined roughly the same as my strings.

As you see, with the smaller games, you need the string to be really long (50 games) to get down to a reasonable playlist. With shorter strings, there is still that question of whether or not to make one of the digits a double.

Again, I did way more with this under p5, than p4/p3. I think when I got to 30 drawings and my p4 list was still too big, I applied the method to p5 to see what it would do there.

A string of length 8, in t... [ More ]

Reply #5

WIN D — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:09:36 GMT

Thank you too Maddog10 ... this thing really has me interested in more than just one way. It seems solid.

And... also Time*Treat

Thanks again for your input aboutStrings. Before I bend your ear too much about Strings I would like to make sure our Strings are alike. If not ....I could still learn form you .

So as not to bog you down with details .....would you mind just reading that Systems post .....the first page and look at the TENN example.... to see if our Strings define th... [ More ]

Reply #4

MADDOG10 — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:55:58 GMT

I also did this with the Big games a few years ago myself WIN D, but I was doing everything by hand and it got to be time consuming if I recall. Anyway I found (1) common denominator Either # 13 or #18 if my memory serves me right. I honestly think you're on the right track..... Good luck..

Reply #3

time*treat — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:39:23 GMT

You may or may not be happy to know that I first developed the idea for the p3/p4 games.

For those games, I used a span of 15-30 days. It was so much work, I decided to aim for p5's larger payouts.

What I used for p5 is below:

I started with a span of 25-30 drawings and went as high as 100+ for testing.

couple of definitions:

span: number of drawings in the lookback period

string: number of contiguous drawings where each set has 1 or more of the winning numbers and (ideally... [ More ]

Reply #2

WIN D — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:44:07 GMT

Very Good time*treat .... thank you. Do you remember any of the stats from that time? Anything you can remember about their length etc. Anything you want to throw out there would be great.

I llike that filter name ... LOL In a big game like this almost any filter still isn't big enough is it? Still just too many plays huh?

Can you remember the amount of numbers in those strings ....or were there more than one? Sorry..to fly at you .... I am just happy I found someone that used ongoing s... [ More ]

Reply #1

time*treat — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:55:40 GMT

Heh, that's my doesn't-play-well-with-others filter. You've found it.

Many years ago, I tried something like this. I looked for large string in a span of contiguous drawings where each one had one of the winning numbers for a same single future drawing. I even looked at the reverse - large spaces where all of the future winning digits for a particular drawing were missing. In both cases, there was reasonable success and a theoretical profit, but too many combos to play at once.

It's nice,... [ More ]

Hello Jackpot Games players ...like your opinion

WIN D — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:23:18 GMT

We would be very interested in getting your opinion on a very particular kind tracking method. How might this method relate to larger number games? Is there something like this already being used in your tracking software?

I know that a lot of you are strictly Big game hunters ......and may not even play PICK -3 but..... thought to ask you about a certain idea ....or system of tracking that may be of interest to you and how it might relate to your bigger games.

It's all about track... [ More ]