Try your system on this..it's simple. L

Reply #6

Spot9 — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:04:26 GMT

http://www.lotterynumberadvisor.com

Reply #5

L J1 — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:42:44 GMT

BobP, I have that product LONA, it was a software progarm on 3 1/2 inch disk, Mfg., by a company named Leader Software(tm), and the author was Prof. Darrel A. Dolph or DAD; and your right, it too was programmed in DOS, copyright in 1992-93.

I would venture to say the software is longer in use or for sale because LONA was not Y2K compliant. I used the software shortly after Y2K and the dates for drawings did not match the current date. That's when I bought Gail Howards software, Advantage Plus... [ More ]

Reply #4

RJOh — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:44:48 GMT

It couldn't have worked too well because the author is still selling it. BobP

Are you saying the fact that it's still selling indicates that it doesn't work well? I would have thought the opposite. Of course, once a website is set up and it has a product that people will buy, there's no reasons to shut it down as long as it continues to attract new customers.

Reply #3

BobP — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:35:58 GMT

Back in the days of dos there was a program called L.O.N.A. that took a range of recent history and looked back for a reasonable match in the past and then suggested something I assume. I don't know what it suggested if anything, because I never bought it and there was no free trial. It couldn't have worked too well because the author is still selling it. BobP

Reply #2

JKING — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:35:18 GMT

Hi,

Thanks for your comments RJOH. They are appreciated as always. *S*

In response...Simple reptitive patterns like the ones in my original post are food for creative thought.

I think that almost every repetitive pattern exercise you try is going to yeild the same results unless it is designed to identify that specific pattern. The results being 2/3/4 out of 5, but no big winners. The more simple patterns like mine that you create and try, the more you will see that you get the same

Reply #1

RJOh — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:26:39 GMT

One can see that each combination start one number higher in each additional drawing and all the combinations have a range of 5.

Test #1

Most systems aren't designed to look for such patterns and most system use numbers that have come up in previous drawings so 10 would not be expected. If the system picked hot and cold numbers then for hot numbers it would pick 3 4 5 6 7 and for cold numbers it would pick 1 2 7 8 9 which has 3 of the next combination.

Test #2

The test is tricky sin... [ More ]

Try your system on this..it's simple. L

JKING — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:46:05 GMT

Hi,

After a few years of looking at systems and reading about observations at the LP, a thought occurred to me. Can any of the systems handle simple repetitive patterns and have a winning prediction? The idea being, if a system can't predict something simple, how can it predict somthing complex.

If you think your system is pretty good, you might want to try the following:

Test #1

Pick 1: 1,2,3,4,5

Pick 2: 2,3,4,5,6

Pick 3: 3,4,5,6,7

Pick 4: 4,5,6,7,8

Pick 5: 5,6,7,8,9... [ More ]

Try your system on this..it's simple. *L*

Reply #6

Reply #5

Reply #4

Reply #3

Reply #2

Reply #1

Try your system on this..it's simple. *L*

Try your system on this..it's simple. L

Try your system on this..it's simple. L