<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>DC-5? Disaster.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/201073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: DC-5? Disaster.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1414299</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1414299</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>jimmy<br /><br />Getting 2, 3 or 4 out of 5 on a Tx Cash 5 game is almost the same as getting nothing.<br /><br />Don&#x27;t people play jackpot games to have a chance to win the jackpot and not to win $2 or so?<br /><br />If you can already win 3 straight, you would instead play the pick 3 straight for a $500 prize.<br /><br />And in the same way, if you can already win 4 straight you would play the pick 4 for $5 000.<br /><br />I know that you can say that it is not the same as it would be or might be easier to get 3 or 4 out of 5 and yo... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1414299">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1414180</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1414180</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:47:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Really, you&#x27;d rather get nothing 99,999 out of 100,000 tickets. Keep in mind that $50,000 prize is the only prize. Match 4 or 3 and you get jack. If that&#x27;s what you want, who am I to judge.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413605</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413605</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>markp1950</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin has a nice game 1:1.6MIl. (supercash)<br /><br />Prize is $350,000 and everybody who wins gets the 350K...<br /><br />It&#x27;s a 6 number game.<br /><br />I like Illinois Little lotto.... 5 x 39 numbers 1:575,757<br /><br />Jackpot is usually day 1 100K , day 2 175K , day 3 250K, day 4 520K, day 5 640K<br /><br />MarkP</p>]]></description>
			<category>markp1950</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413582</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413582</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rcbbuckeye</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I would love to see Cash 5 go away and have a Quinto game instead. 100,000 to 1 odds for $50k is much better, with no parimutual.</p>]]></description>
			<category>rcbbuckeye</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413568</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413568</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>thor</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>lantern:<br /><br />texas cash 5 has odds of 1:435,897 and if you are the sole winner the jackpots are usually between $ 22 k and $25 k. but, several winners can cut that amount a lot such as on 09/23 when there were 3 tickets and the prize was $ 7,124 each.</p>]]></description>
			<category>thor</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413530</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413530</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The straight odds are 1/100 000 for the Quinto and pays $50 000.<br /><br />The odds on Jackpot kind of lottos are in the Millions for the jackpot and yet people play them anyway.<br /><br />The Tx Cash 5 pays much less than that (I think) and yet the odds are many times worse than those.<br /><br />But being able to pay pick 3 and pick 4 straight straight on the Quinto is of no use as they already have pick 3 and 4 games there, being able to play straight pairs for $50 for $1 bet is not so bad.<br /><br />I don&#x27;t know of any... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073/1413530">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DC-5? Disaster.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it appears the District of Columbia has already taken on a version of Pennsylvania&#x27;s Quinto. It&#x27;s apparently been on sale for a month. Now, doing that is already pretty dumb because, let&#x27;s face it, Quinto is terrrrrrrrible. The odds of winning a prize are rediculous, as opposed having overall odds of 1 in 10 in Cash 5 or 1 in 6 for Treasure Hunt, Quinto has odds of 1 in 100 at best, with the pairs. But it&#x27;s kind of pointless seeing you&#x27;re only playing 2/5 of the total numbers, and you can... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/201073">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

