LottoArchitect's review.

Reply #34

lottoarchitect — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:44:16 GMT

Well Lantern, the algorithms are not static at all. I'll give you as an example the delay algorithm which always evaluates to the current lottery history you have there (all algorithms actually evaluate what you ask them to evaluate), taking into account the latest draws you have, so if you introduce another new draw the prediction of the filters change as well to take into account the new information. Even the backtesting of the algorithms works the same way as the Hot-Cold-Due system's backtes... [ More ]

Reply #33

LANTERN — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:00:09 GMT

I just read that and tried it, it sure helped a lot, but created more questions.

I will have to read the help file.

Well, I just learned how to save the generated combinations on a text file.

Now I am getting some-where little by little.

There is still much that I don't know, later I will read the help file again.

Also I still don't yet know what many of the filters on LA are, once I know a lot more about LottoArchitect then I will know, if it is more advanced for the pick 3 game... [ More ]

Reply #32

Jordans121 — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:11:37 GMT

why do people make such a big deal about wheels. I hope they only use them for pick 4 and up because a wheel is not needed for the pick 3 at all. looks like my study has paid off.

Reply #31

lottoarchitect — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:06:55 GMT

Well, GAT will come out sometime but nothing to be announced yet about it.

As for filtered wheelers, I have already Wheel Generator for this and all the tests I have performed against other software, it throws dust to them in terms of produced quality and winning outcome. It also introduces concepts not available elsewhere - what I call a dynamic wheel construction - which is what makes it top quality for what it is designed to do.

As for a universal version, Lotto Architect already suppor... [ More ]

Reply #30

LANTERN — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:12:01 GMT

Thanks a lot!

It was very nice of you making that post!

No news yet about your new Lottery Games Predictor (GAT)?

You know that you could also make filtered wheelers of the kind of SkorLoto, so long as the programs and their code are not exactly the same, they are very heavy on GUI graphics, but you should see that they have a lot of good filters, Skorloto is not your run of the mill filtered wheeler, It has a lot of good filters functions and could have even more yet, it is all a matte... [ More ]

Reply #29

LotteryTechInc — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:57:19 GMT

TENAJ

Exactly I wouldn't be able too play the games if it wasn't for lottery software back in the day I used paper/pencil strategies I but never won anything but when I started using software I was able too hit 3/4 in the Pick-5,straight in Pick-3 and boxed Pick-4. If users don't have a clue what too do with the software then it's just a waste of time/money plus you have too know which programs aer worth purchasing

Reply #28

Tenaj — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:41:33 GMT

I started out with paper/pencil for workouts and tracking, then added Word to make searching results quicker than flipping pages. I still manually track several states to keep up with what's running and what's on the board. That way you can see the patterns as they happen, rather than going back and comparing. You're know what numbers have hit 5 or 6 states like 366 and 850 combos did.

Then I went to Excel. Then I had my main workout programmed and added to a commercial software. Then I added... [ More ]

Reply #27

Jordans121 — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:56:43 GMT

People have to stop looking for the easy way out and put in some work to see results. I am at least 6 times better than when I first started and still have to improve. People need to find something thats consistent and stick with it.

Reply #26

paurths — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:42:36 GMT

Concerning the Microsoft Excel ; the problem with some people is that when they use or buy 'lottery software', they believe that it should spit out the winning numbers (if not each and every time, then at least 50%)

The thing is, i have never heard of anyone complaining with Microsoft concerning (e.g.) Excel, Word, Access, ... name it, for the following reason: no one expects that when they launch MS Word the program will write their autobiography on its own, for an examples sake. Nor does an... [ More ]

Reply #25

Todd — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:45:56 GMT

Could not agree more.

For the reasons you mention, when people ask me what lottery software they should get, my reply is Microsoft Excel . It is a lottery player's best friend, and great for beginners and experts alike.

Also, for this same reason, most of the Platinum-level features available at Lottery Post are not systems -- they are flexible, powerful tools that can answer questions about numbers and generate and filter number sets. They are also fed by perhaps the most extensive onlin... [ More ]

Reply #24

Todd — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:38:42 GMT

For Pick 3 wheeling software, you should use the new Lottery Post Pick 3 and Pick 4 Positional Wheel Generator. It's not only easy to use, but offers some of the most complete and flexible filtering around.

https://www.lotterypost.com/wheel-positional-34.aspx

Reply #23

LotteryTechInc — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:23:29 GMT

RJOH

You and I know that's not really possible but unfortunatley it's true lottery software was never created too make anyone rich if that was possible the software developers would be winning consistantyly with there own product.

Reply #22

LotteryTechInc — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:20:29 GMT

Sorry about that Todd I didn't realise I made an inappropriate comment I'll make sure I pay closer attention next time

Reply #21

RJOh — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:45:53 GMT

Sounds like Lotto Architect is designed for the players who have a playing strategy and spend time defining exactly the parameters of the combinations they want. Problem is most players aren't like that, they want software that does that and wins. They want to play a game with overall odds of 1:50 and have 10% of their tickets win something, they want to break even or make a profit every time they play.

Reply #20

LotteryTechInc — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:39:07 GMT

I will admit the program does look very intimidating at first glance I had trouble creating a new lottery file so I asked for the instructions and LottoArchitect provided them so now I can very easily create a new lottery game file.As for the wheeling and filtering all you need too do is seriously study the helpfile on that. I have many programs some I thought were useless until I took the time too really study how things work.Now I use them all the time,LottoArchitect could probalby use some mo... [ More ]

Reply #19

lottoarchitect — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:19:46 GMT

Well Lantern, Lotto Architect is written in Delphi.

As for the workings of the program, it may be hard to understand because it works completely different to other software, so you have to grasp the new logic it introduces. The logic is universal as much as possible. What I mean by that? As an example, for the filters part, all filters are treated the same way, so as long as you know how to setup a filter and use it, you automatically know how to setup all the included 700+ filters available.... [ More ]

Reply #18

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:22:36 GMT

You want to program?

Why not try the free Phyton, or even Lazarus

They are free.

Reply #17

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:04:33 GMT

I know not, not the same for all of them, of course.

Expert Lotto seems to be on Java

LottoArchitect, maybe some kind of Visual basic net or even Delphi, but probably a kind of Visual Basic by Microsoft.

-----------

The others, maybe some kind of visual basic or C or Delphi, But I don't know.

Mike's programs probably Java.

Ricky's maybe a kind of Visual Basic or Delphi.

Reply #16

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:59:34 GMT

Quite true

Reply #15

hcrude14 — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:53:02 GMT

I Hope this falls under this thread,I have a question,The programs that have been mentioned and some of the high filutin prorams that haven't ie Gail howard ect,What program languages are they written in?I'm guessing that they maybe all different.

I'm not a programer but always have been interested which languages are used?

Thanks in advance for a reply

Reply #14

RJOh — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:51:39 GMT

Familiarity with lottery programs can sometime breed contempt. After the excitement of using them for a while expecting spectacular results, reality sets in and you realize they are only tools. Programs don't have the intelligent to made decisions or come up with strategies for winning a lottery, that's up to the players. Programmers can only put in their programs routines that they think are useful and attractive to the players who are most likely to buy their product. Most lottery programs all... [ More ]

Reply #13

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:02:52 GMT

While it is not possible for most people to do this , I guess, It would be best that a predictor also becomes a lottery programer, because only a person himself knows what he or she needs in other to win.

Others will code whatever themselves want, but it might not be what a particular person wants and or needs.

There is a saying that if you want something done right to do it yourself.

Reply #12

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:48:58 GMT

Yes, filter software is great, if it has the right filters, many of them and the right stats and also many of those.

But of no use at all, unless a person knows how to use them, I don't know what LottoArchitect has or not, until I learn how to use it.

Once I know, then I will also know if it is good enough for me or not.

I myself for the most part care about filters and little about anything else, but I don't care about just any filter, only about those that I see that are best for me t... [ More ]

Reply #11

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:37:02 GMT

I have not used most JackPot games software, not even all pick 3 and 4 softwares either.

But I have tried a few pick 3 programs, I myself like best not programs that make predictions, but filtered wheelers and programs that give stats, but mostly filtered wheelers even by themselves, years ago when I was learning how to make pick 3 predictions, I didn't do too bad just with filtered wheelers and without any program giving me stats.

Even if those filtered wheelers had and still have too man... [ More ]

Reply #10

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:21:50 GMT

Thanks much for your post!

You are right, but now the program is DonatWare and it does have documentation, it is just not detailed enough and I didn't see detailed step by step examples, the program being so complicated to use it needs very many detailed step by step examples.

Some people say that it is a very good program, but I guess that you need to understand how to use it to know that.

But I bet that only Anastasios can make full use of it, the rest might know more or less about it... [ More ]

Reply #9

LANTERN — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:59:19 GMT

I had made a mistake on the amounts there, like maybe about $1300, because many wins were doubles and 1 win was a triple which pays $500.

So the loses were much lower than that.

Since then, I did more testing with past draws, that is, the program checks the past draws and sees how it does, with the right wheel, betting style and right setting of the Hot-Cold-Due prediction system, I had the program check the last 100 draws and with that wheel and settings the backtesting that the program d... [ More ]

Reply #8

LotteryTechInc — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:59:04 GMT

I have a copy of LottoArchitect and I think it has a lot of potential not in predicting numbers for wheeling but in other ways. I select my own group of numbers too wheel and I believe this software has some pretty good filtering methods that are quite capable of producing a winning jackpot as long as the user is able too use the software effectively and efficiently. My other favorite programs are Expert Lotto,LottWin 2009,Lotto Aim,Lottery Director,LottoWhiz Pro and LottoMania2005.

Reply #7

PlraX — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:42:57 GMT

i AGREE whit yoU Lattern MAYBE lottoarchitect is a powerfull software but is not firendly interface.. maybe programes must release aother version more friendly to user.. a LATTERN you are a expereienced user for many years what software are the best software or more staticatl software that you know here are my OWN list THAT FOR ME are the best i use until now

1.LOTWIN line builder

2.Experlotto .. VERY GOOD VERY GOOD

------------------------

3.LOTTOPRO

the 1st 2 software are simila... [ More ]

Reply #6

Delta Draw — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:24:09 GMT

Thank you for the review.

I also am peeved by software written by the programmer, for the programmer with no clues or examples of how to use it, same for systems poorly documented. As a beta tester I can tell quickly what needs to be improved before release.

Pitfall: One needs the intuition of the programmer and that requires trying to figure out how and why a feature is designed. Professional software has the same pitfalls in degrees, so it seems intuition is something not frequently pac... [ More ]

Reply #5

LANTERN — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:14:36 GMT

These things are relative and flex-able depends on amount of combinations played, for how long, for which games, if boxed and or straight.

It is possible to maybe do much better with the right combinations of factors, maybe even make a profit perhaps.

No questions about it, it is better than quick picks, no matter with factors are combined and used, even with just the Hot-Cold-Due system used as it is the only one that I can use at this point in time.

Cause I just did some more testing,... [ More ]

Reply #4

LANTERN — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:00:13 GMT

Even so. 26 times with 84 boxed combos on 60 past draws is not bad, it still beats random expectation, it is better than quick picks.

Reply #3

LANTERN — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:25:25 GMT

Thanks, as a very few people appear to make better use of it and or a good portion of the program, it is not impossible to understand how to use more of it, but for very many people or for most of them, it might be either very hard or not possible.

I think that maybe there are fewer than 10 people who can make almost full use of it and maybe fewer than 6 who can make full use, that is just a guess and not based on facts.

The program and the documentation could have been made more user frie... [ More ]

Reply #2

x1kosmic — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:41:58 GMT

Thanks for the Review

I know your pretty good at checking in to stuff like that.

Reply #1

LANTERN — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:35:47 GMT

The Hot-Cold-Due prediction mode is really much better than quick picks, not great, but much better, at the very least 2 times better, and even if so far I can't neither save nor print the combinations getting those combinations is easy, the problem is typing them onto Notepad, that is some work.

For those that just play quick picks any way and can't predict too good too often, then the Hot-Cold-Due prediction method might be one of the things to try as the program is DonatWare more or less f... [ More ]

LottoArchitect's review.

LANTERN — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:32:25 GMT

Well, after al these years, I just took a look at LottoArchitect.

It is completely user unfriendly.

Setting-up a lottery game for it and putting the draws in wasn't too hard, just a little, but can be done.

Using the Hot-Cold system was not too hard.

But the hot-cold prediction system is not very good at predicting combos.

And you have to use the wheels that the program has, making your own wheels is not well explained and could take for ever to make some of them.

The program's... [ More ]