<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Pick 3 digit elimination</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/205059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Pick 3 digit elimination</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1484091</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1484091</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:45:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Skips sample, last 30 skips, but not for numbers on above chart.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1484089</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1484089</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:23:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Stats of this kind might help<br /><br />Also skips stats might help.<br /><br />I might be wrong, but maybe every digit in the long run should hit an average of about 33% (Boxed), Is that right or not</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483997</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483997</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Str8master</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anything better than random play is beating the odds in my opinion. Eliminate 2 digits and the 50% house edge is gone. It may just come down to good timing like Win D pointed out, but I&#x27;m looking through hit patterns, digit relationships, trailing numbers, etc to see if I can find some formula that even slightly beats picking two random digits out of thin air.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Str8master</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483893</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483893</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That you filter out almost half of the total numbers when you filter out 2 digits, that by itself shows that it is easier said than done.<br /><br />That is because there are 3 positions on a pick 3 game.<br /><br />Of course, it is not impossible to do.<br /><br />The thing is, How often can it be done O.K.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483565</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483565</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not subtract all 3 digits from the last draw each time you think the timing is right ?<br /><br />Subtract all 3 digits and you filter out 657 numbers of the 1000.<br /><br />You will be in the right side of the swimming pool ...... 1 out of every 3 draws.<br /><br />Timing is the key..... but you won&#x27;t have to worry with 657 numbers each time you do play.<br /><br />34% of the time you will only have to play with the right 343 straight numbers .<br /><br />.........and look<br /><br />Thats only 35 single b... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483565">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483470</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483470</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>joker17</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why not reduce your odds from 1000 down to 100?<br /><br />If I like the number 38 in the back pair, then just do the following:<br /><br />038<br /><br />138<br /><br />238<br /><br />338<br /><br />438<br /><br />538<br /><br />638<br /><br />738<br /><br />838<br /><br />938<br /><br />The first number is taken care of. The back pair is only 00-99, so only a hundred possibilities left.<br /><br />You can further reduce the odds down to 50. If the back pairs are showing below 50 for 4 or 5 days in a row, play a number above 50, and vice versa. The 50 reduction is better not only because there is... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059/1483470">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>joker17</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pick 3 digit elimination</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Str8master</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone come up with a good method for consistently eliminating one or two losing digits from your plays? I was looking at the numbers and tossing out just one bad digit reduces 1,000 straight combos down to 729. Throw out two digits and you&#x27;re down to 512 combos.<br /><br />There&#x27;s only a max of 3 unique digits drawn from a field of 10 in any given draw, so that&#x27;s at least 7 losing digits for each and every game. Statisically the odds are about 1 in 2 of successfully knocking out two digits so any m... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/205059">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Str8master</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

