mega fixed

Reply #18

emerald64 — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:15:03 GMT

yes i know - rocky point - but i havent heard of anyone coming forth yet

Reply #17

badboy00z — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:13:34 GMT

Someone in New York.

Reply #16

emerald64 — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 02:16:17 GMT

does anyone know who won the 162 mega

Reply #15

rdgrnr — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:26:45 GMT

Greg, In your contention that the computers are being programmed NOT to spit out all the possible combinations, are you saying that this is a known and accepted matter of routine or a clandestine scam? (I'm a little slow when it comes to thinkin' and such

Reply #14

Greg — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:06:38 GMT

Keep in mind what William Atwood write in his book called The Lottery Solution.

The Lottery terminals are programmed NOT to spit out all the possible combinations there are in the MM game. So the 'quickpick you buy today in your state could be the same one issued tomorrow in another state.

But when the jackpot reaches $200+ million, more of those combinations are released = made available for purchased in quick pick form. (Another reason to place more trust in a system than a computer that... [ More ]

Reply #13

KY Floyd — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:18:09 GMT

Two things to remember:

1. For everyone who has a reason they won't play some set of numbers, there's at least one person who has a reason that they will play them.

2. The lottery doesn't draw numbers. In most cases they draw balls, but even with an RNG the computer isn't picking numbers (the only digits the computer can work with are 0 and 1). The numbers are simply a convenient way to label the balls so we know which is which. The idea that winning numbers are somehow close to each or fo... [ More ]

Reply #12

jesjam — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:29:19 GMT

hi floyd, i def see the math now. wish the math teacher would have spent some more time on this during my learning days. they could probably create a semester on lottery mathmatics / probability course. it still bugs me when i see numbers close together. for instance, the other day in illinois little lotto 1-39

ALL FIVE numbers drawn were in the thirties...

assuming nobody would hit that, i checked the site. three winners, two WERE quickpicks. amazing, none the less. 100k jackpot, each pro... [ More ]

Reply #11

KY Floyd — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:40:12 GMT

If there was only one possible way for 5 numbers to be separated byno more than 26 and you'd said 4 coins all landing heads up, you'd bealmost right. 26 is fairly close to half of the possible numbers, sofor each number drawn there's about a 50% chance that it will be in thelower half. That's roughly the same as each coin being flipped having a50% chance of landing heads.

In reality there are many ways for the 5 numbers to be separated by26 or less. They can all fall in the bottom or top rang... [ More ]

Reply #10

jesjam — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:23:00 GMT

this summer, i remember several draws including powerball, when at least 5 of the 6 numbers were seperated by no more than 26.

next time you purchase some quickpicks, take a look at the ticket and see how many lines are like that drawing. not one is my bet. it's like tossing six coins up in the air and having them all land heads.

Reply #9

KY Floyd — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:57:06 GMT

It's hard to reach a realistic conclusion when you're starting with faulty factual information. Over the past two years the MM jackpot has been higher than $100 million 11 times. 5 times the jackpot has been won before reaching $200 million. Of those 5 times, one was $196 million and the other 4 were $135 million or less. That's well short of always going to at least $200 million.

In 6 of those 11 times the jackpot has been won at something over $200 million. 4 of those 6 were won at the firs... [ More ]

Reply #8

rdgrnr — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:24:39 GMT

I'm with you diamondpalace, and I intend to demonstrate it tomorrow.

Reply #7

diamondpalace — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:05:45 GMT

My spies have confirmed that it's not rigged. This game is the real deal...

Reply #6

RJOh — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:09:30 GMT

Any time a combination has a range of 21(the distance from its lowest number to its highest number) or smaller, your clock face will have a large area with no numbers. But that has only happened 24 times in the last 468 drawings since the last matrix change. If what you suspect was true then you could play only combinations with a range of 21 or less and improve your odds of winning quite a bit. If you did that and your winnings increased then your argument might make some sense other wise it do... [ More ]

Reply #5

PlraX — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:17:37 GMT

please POST a litle explication or better for use this system likes.. interesting please

its posible to use ina 6/38 GAME

Reply #4

JWBlue — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:10:27 GMT

I happen to agree. When the jackpot crosses 100 mil, it does seem to be more difficult to win. If it hits 100 mill, it seems to always go to at least $200 mil.

Reply #3

konane — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:30:01 GMT

Have you ever called the Georgia Lottery where those drawings take place to find out how many ballsets they rotate through to perform drawings? Also ask how many pre-jackpot draw and post-jackpot draws they perform before each and every Mega Millions drawing. Additionally inquire how many machines they use do perform draws.

I was once told that data for pre and post draws was available at lottery headquarters if someone wanted to come request it. You might want to find out exactly what you'd... [ More ]

Reply #2

Todd — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:14:01 GMT

Reply #1

Guru101 — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:29:27 GMT

Your post is short and doesn't provide many details. Good luck convincing others Mega Millions is rigged with that incredible evidence you just posted.

mega fixed

jesjam — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:07 GMT

whenever the pots grow and grow, i print out a clock face

and post the winner numbers where the minutes should be.

after examining it, i discover a big hole

in my world of math mathmatices, you would have to flip six coins and they'd all have to turn up heads.

here's my example

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

26 42

25 43

24 44

23 45

22 46

21 47

20 48

19 49

18 50

17 51

16 52

15 53

14 54

13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 5... [ More ]