<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Dealing with Past Drawings</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/221618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Dealing with Past Drawings</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1809674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1809674</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 02:12:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>TeAl*888</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Lotto Draw Equipment usually undergoes changes at least once every year or two<br /><br />if you&#x27;re going to factor in the Draw Equipment in your pattern recognition system, I&#x27;d say don&#x27;t go back further than 2 years at most</p>]]></description>
			<category>TeAl*888</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1807351</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1807351</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:46:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Hermanus104</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I used to analyze Mega Millions, I just extrapolated. I came up with a ratio to determine how many times 53-56 would have won when the highest ball was 52. Now I analyze just the Pick-3 and I am pleased to say that I have not encountered this problem. (Only problem I have come up with was when, after 18 years, Virginia finally introduced Sunday drawings).</p>]]></description>
			<category>Hermanus104</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1802511</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1802511</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>garyo1954</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>*Pirate Arrrrgh*<br /><br />Editing requires more grog. *moan*<br /><br />*Looks at 3 of 6 winning ticket*<br /><br />Me knowest now by which we was waylaid.</p>]]></description>
			<category>garyo1954</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801763</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801763</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s no different with PowerBall.<br /><br />until Nov 1, 1997 - 5/45+1/42<br /><br />Nov 5,1997 - 5/49+1/42<br /><br />Oct 9,2002 - 1/53+1/42<br /><br />Aug 31,2005 - 5/55+1/42<br /><br />Jan 7,2009 - 5/59+1/39<br /><br />For tonight drawing, I used the last 182 drawings to predict my picks but I check them against the whole history to make sure I wasn&#x27;t using any repeat combinations.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801750</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801750</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bobby623</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If your are looking for guidance, I suggest you start with latest 6/54 game starting in April, 2006.<br /><br />Like all states, Texas introduces new drawing equipment and ball sets from time to time for all of the games.<br /><br />The Texas Lotto machines and ball sets were replaced on Feb. 1, 2009, which could be a good starting point when analyzing past<br /><br />drawings.<br /><br />Personally, I wouldn&#x27;t use any of the draw results prior to April 2006 when different machines and ball sets were in use.<br /><br />Some folks don... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801750">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>bobby623</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801697</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801697</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>badboy00z</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just look at all the 6/54 results as if it never changed.</p>]]></description>
			<category>badboy00z</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801640</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801640</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PERDUE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I do any number crunching for TX Lotto I use all of the pick 6 history. I do not include the drawings when it was a pick 5 plus bonus ball.</p>]]></description>
			<category>PERDUE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801599</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801599</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>joker17</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Think if a state took their Pick 3 and eliminated the zero. Looking at past results from then on wouldn&#x27;t do much good, would it?<br /><br />With all the multiple pretests they do before a drawing, and with the rotation of the tubes and rotation of sets of tubes, it really doesn&#x27;t matter. It&#x27;s skewed from the getgo....</p>]]></description>
			<category>joker17</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801592</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618/1801592</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Coin Toss</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would say the game as ity is now could only be referred to the same game as it was then, meaning the same matrix. Anything with a different matrix can only produce skewed data.<br /><br />Think if a state took their Pick 3 and eliminated the zero. Looking at past results from then on wouldn&#x27;t do much good, would it</p>]]></description>
			<category>Coin Toss</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dealing with Past Drawings</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>garyo1954</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at the past draws in the Texas Lotto this morning and became aware it has undergone several major changes through the years.<br /><br />It began in November, 1992 as a 6 of 50 drawing.<br /><br />In July, 2000 it morphed into a 6 of 54, but kept the same name.<br /><br />Then in May, 2003 it morphed again, becoming a 5 of 44 with a 1 of 44 (bonus ball). It was still called the Texas Lotto.<br /><br />The latest change was April, 2006 when it reverted back to a 6 of 54. This remains the current version, still name... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/221618">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>garyo1954</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

