Lexicographic Numbers and a little math

Reply #84

gpagator — Sun, 29 May 2011 21:20:29 GMT

Hello,

I am a new member and hope I am following the rules in how I am posting. If not please tell me of my error and I will correct it. now to the subject at hand, does the lexicographic number selections allow you to create a list of all 575757 number combination in a 5-39. what I want is tobe able to see all the number combinations at once, any help or sugestions will be welcome.

Reply #83

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 11 May 2011 23:30:46 GMT

Boot

Good to hear from you, send me your updated database and I will convert it for you

RL

Reply #82

bootleg233 — Wed, 11 May 2011 22:08:53 GMT

Hell i cant even get my tn cash database in it! lol

Reply #81

adamcustom — Wed, 11 May 2011 20:13:21 GMT

RL,

Ok, now I see your point. It can be played ( at least) 2 ways.

Thanks.

Adam

PS. Does anybody else try to use this program or me only

Reply #80

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 11 May 2011 17:49:26 GMT

Adam

Notice that for the set highlighted that both the foward and reverse lexi settings are incorrect but it still returns

02 and 38 for the first and last number. I could have have set the reverse lexi to less then 100 and still got

a 38 in the return. This would have been one of the cases where even missing all three digits in both FWD

and REV settings would not of kept you from winning any of the prizes. This is based on the first method

where you set the first and last number

Reply #79

adamcustom — Wed, 11 May 2011 15:49:08 GMT

RL

Thanks a lot. I love this program. Not that it's easy to hit values, but one does not have to dedicate to it hour upon hour. Ranging numbers works absolutely

perfectly, we only need to find ways to recognize patterns that could work.

Ok, now pls tells us how we can miss the settings and still hit big.

Thanks

Adam

Reply #78

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 11 May 2011 15:18:09 GMT

Adam

Good job, one of the nice things about this is that it is possible to miss both the foward and reverse settings

and still hit a 5of5.

RL

Reply #77

adamcustom — Wed, 11 May 2011 08:01:43 GMT

RL,

Thanks for the explanation. Last night for the first time I went live with playing based on Lexico only. I ended up with 12 sets. I missed the first digit in Forward

Lexico, but was right in my selection of Reverse Lexi. Result : 1x 3 of 5. So even missing the first digit in Lexico, it's possible to get a lower prize.

When ranging digits I do opt to set same or very close values for Low and high range.

Btw, the winning LEXCON was 509718 with the previous one 544440 and the last b... [ More ]

Reply #76

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 10 May 2011 16:56:35 GMT

Adam

The higher the lexi value used the more numbers that will be returned. Setting my my 5-39 game to 500/575 gives

a range of 13 to 35 which is a sharp contrast to setting 000/ 100 which returns 01/02. The last 75,757 draws in the

matrix covers much of 13 plus all draws with first numbers 14 to 35. When playing this range use the same range

for both high and low. Remember that the range is padded by the program even though the user only inputs the

first 3 digits. Setting lo... [ More ]

Reply #75

CARBOB — Tue, 10 May 2011 15:31:54 GMT

Rl,

I created a Cash 3 game in Lotsoft using the F-Lexi values. Haven't found a filter that really sticks out, yet.

An image with some of the filters.

Reply #74

adamcustom — Mon, 09 May 2011 17:31:23 GMT

RL,

Your advice to time playing when lower range digit might hit makes a lot of sense. When selecting higher value I find quite often that more than one number

is ranged for position 1 or 5 which makes playing on a low budget pretty hard.

Adam

Reply #73

adamcustom — Sun, 08 May 2011 19:26:30 GMT

RL,

I do not know how valid that observation might be for other games and matrixes, but I noticed following :

1. ar. 60% of the time one of the Lexi values repeats from the last draw

2. another value most often comes from within 3 last draws

3. third value often comes from within 6 last draws

I cannot identify which will follow which path for the moment, unfortunately.

Adam

Reply #72

adamcustom — Sun, 08 May 2011 18:43:28 GMT

Oops, sorry RL. Should have been posted in another thread.

Adam

Reply #71

adamcustom — Sun, 08 May 2011 18:42:22 GMT

Gary,

I think that looking at the total of base digits in the game can tell the story abt. what we can expect. For example looking at 1170 games in 5/42 game

I can see that :

1 base digit occurred - once only

2 base digits occurred- 23 times

3 base digits occurred- 84 times

4 base digits occurred- 235 times

5 base digits occured- 359 times

6 base digits occurred- 287 times

7 base digits occurred- 150 times

8 base digits occurred- 29 times

9 base digits occurred

Reply #70

adamcustom — Sat, 07 May 2011 17:09:01 GMT

RL,

First off once again great thanks to you for allowing us to use Lexi. My game is drawn 3 times a week so have not had enough time to test my skills as yet.

I start on paper to check how I will be doing. So far I tried once and missed the range by a mile. The program is great for sure, but it take some practice to find out how to best use it.

Adam

Reply #69

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 07 May 2011 16:58:01 GMT

Hello

Just wondering if anyone has had any success using this program. Not getting any feedback so I will

let this post die out. I would like to hear how people are doing, over 70 people have downloaded it so

someone must be using it. Remember that the first digit is the main focus in both the foward and reverse

lexi. You can set the low and high settings to the same value. The second and third value helps but almost

any range will work much of the time. Tip! try playing on the da... [ More ]

Reply #68

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 05 May 2011 18:49:40 GMT

I added another tool to the [stats]

http://www.box.net/shared/ni4lguk3lx

Just download and and run the install, You don't need to uninstall a older version if you have already

installed it. Any databases you have built should not be erased but I am working on a xp machine so

if in doubt then back them up before you reinstall.

RL

Reply #67

retxx — Thu, 05 May 2011 14:23:32 GMT

great. looking forward to that. My thinking is that logicaly speaking wouldn't it be easier to hit 3 or 4 digits rather than 5 or 6? Just a thought.

Reply #66

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 05 May 2011 01:52:42 GMT

retxx

I've been working on a solution for p-3/p-4 games and think something can be done using two digits for

p-3 and 3 for p-4. In a P-3 game the first digit runs 100 lines and the second digit changes every 10 so it

might work well for hitting the outside pair leaving a 10 line cover. A p-4 game might be even better giving

the 1st and 4th and trap the 2nd-3rd within a very small range. Hope to get some testing done in the next

week or so.

RL

Reply #65

retxx — Thu, 05 May 2011 00:53:57 GMT

question; just wonder at some point could this be used for a pic 3 or 4 game

Reply #64

adamcustom — Wed, 04 May 2011 20:01:22 GMT

RL,

Thanks a lot. It just struck me later that it could be it when I saw same Error 62 messsage for 542 matrix.

Adam

Reply #63

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 04 May 2011 19:56:35 GMT

Adam

The source file is the wrong format. I have another build program that will work with DM files. I will send

it to you. The one provided only works with the LP format

The LP format is

Mon, May 2, 2011 05-08-09-23-26

Notice the month is a 3 letter code but this is not the only difference. The line is read in three parts

1st = Mon

2nd = May 2

3rd = 2011 05-08-09-23-26

All of these have to be exact to work

RL

Reply #62

adamcustom — Wed, 04 May 2011 19:09:55 GMT

Could the reason be that the datafile is in the following format?

TUE 05/03/11 11 12 14 35 37 39

SAT 04/30/11 05 07 09 26 28 42

THU 04/28/11 22 31 44 45 47 49

TUE 04/26/11 04 09 21 32 37 41

SAT 04/23/11 01 17 18 20 22 49

instead of TUE 05/03/11 11-12 -14-35-37-39

Thks

Adam

Reply #61

adamcustom — Wed, 04 May 2011 18:46:46 GMT

RL,

I followed your instructions and after build-up clicked on DB649 as that's the matrix. Either I did sth wrong or it's a bug as it does not look the way it should. Did I do sth incorrect?

Day Date Numbers F-Lex R-Lex

___________________________________________________

TUE 05/03/11 11 12 14 35 37 39 /42/U 4/ 8/ 1 22 31 44 04891695 07738847

TUE 04/26/11 04 09 21 32 37 41 /49/U 4/ 1/ 1 01 04 06 03913543 8381E+07

TUE 04/19/11 06 08 12 25 29 49 /42/U 4/ 4/ 1 05 08... [ More ]

Reply #60

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 04 May 2011 18:19:25 GMT

bestbuy

Gary has started new digit system post, I check it a couple times each day so for questions regarding the

digit system, ask them there.

To answer your question, yes the digit system could be used for that game. Gary is working on the decade

digit patterns and much can be done in that area. As for being the expert I don't know, several here have

come up with things that I never thought of doing. I hope the new post will gain some speed soon but it takes

people asking qu... [ More ]

Reply #59

bestbuy — Wed, 04 May 2011 17:59:30 GMT

Hi RL,

Sorry I mean for the digit system, you are right that's more combos there, theoretically the digit system should apply to it as well, by the way I filtered it by pattern like 1 1 2 1 2 (split 7 numbers into 5 section 0~9, 10~19, 20~29, 30~39, 40~49), but still hard to shrink the filter. I try to apply your way to further filter, actually I checked all 84 numbers, I used 1 2 3 4 + 6 7 8 as ID, but I'm not quite familiar with how to creat all possible combinations by these IDs, I guess t... [ More ]

Reply #58

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 04 May 2011 17:49:23 GMT

upgraded version link http://www.box.net/shared/ni4lguk3lx

This version includes simple databases for Power-ball and Mega-millions games and has a program that

allows the user to build more databases for any game. The database builder program is located in the

main folder and is called BUILDLP.EXE. Double click this file to build a new database but first you will

need a list of past draws. The Build program requires the same format as is used in the LP Lottery results.

Just copy a... [ More ]

Reply #57

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 04 May 2011 16:41:52 GMT

bestbuy

I got your message and was unsure if your talking about the digit system or the Lexi program. The 7-49

matrix would have over 85 million combos and I have not tested the lexicalc for that matrix. As it is now

it is limited to 5 and 6 number lotteries. If and when I get some time I will see if I can add a 7th number

option.

RL

Reply #56

bestbuy — Wed, 04 May 2011 15:49:28 GMT

Hi RL,

I dropped you a message to you yesterday, please take a look.

Thanks

Reply #55

garyo1954 — Wed, 04 May 2011 03:54:16 GMT

GREAT RL!

I took the file down anyway to prevent any confusion it might cause. I'll be looking forward to the new stuff.

Reply #54

adamcustom — Tue, 03 May 2011 14:34:34 GMT

RL

Thanks for the answer. I understand the specific data can only tell.

Adam

Reply #53

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 03 May 2011 14:14:23 GMT

Gary

I have not heard from anyone about it but I will try and post a complete breakdown of how they are

calculated and why. I also have the newer version finished and will be posting a link to it. I am making

the database builder so that it will work with LP's number format. This way paying members will already

have access to download any numbers they want and anyone else interested can upgrade to gold

for under $5.00 for a one month membership. I know in the past I would have pai... [ More ]

Reply #52

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 03 May 2011 13:34:30 GMT

Adam

It's been a while since I have done a side by side of RNG VS Ball dropper but rng's normally produce a little

closer to the expected when viewed from the matrix point. I don't think this makes them any better it is really

just a matter of getting to know your game. Each game seems to have it's own small biases.

RL

Reply #51

garyo1954 — Tue, 03 May 2011 07:01:40 GMT

RL,

Keep up the posting. I'm listening. And working on the getting it part. I need to take down the boxnet link. I think that is confusing people. It's been downloaded about a dozen times and, if I remember correctly, you have to cross check the numbers to come up with the true reverse LEXI.

If anyone is confused, I apologize.

I'll remove it.

I apologize to you as well RL.

G

Reply #50

adamcustom — Mon, 02 May 2011 22:17:02 GMT

RL,

I wonder if ranging the numbers should differ for drop-ball and RNG-run games. I know you've been playing and studing both types of games and probably noticed the differences if they are significant.

Thanks.

Adam

Reply #49

tj47 — Sun, 01 May 2011 22:28:46 GMT

Ok thanks RL. I know what you mean about not havbing enough time, it seems like everytime I turn around I have something else to do.

Reply #48

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:08:21 GMT

tj47

Thanks for your interest in the digit system but I have stopped sending it out. I may make a Power-ball

mega-millions version avaliable at a later time but for now I just don't have the time to support it. It takes

much time to build and keep the databases updated, something I just don't have enough of. The software

takes some time to learn and requires the user to change the way they view the lottery. I have a brother

in law that is a pilot and I remember him telling me abou... [ More ]

Reply #47

tj47 — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:51:31 GMT

Hi RL, I'm definitely interested in your lexi calculator, I have downloaded it and am playing around with it until I get used to it. I was surfing around lottery Post yesterday and happened to stumble across your thread about your digit system for pick-5 and pick-6 lottery.

I tested out your digit system yesterday and to my surprise I would have won almost $300 and 3, 3 of five wins on fantasy five if only I would have played for real. I was wondering, I know it's a lot to ask but could you p... [ More ]

Reply #46

mindtab — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:32:58 GMT

Just for sake purposes, let's say that I purged my all outfile ( all outfile comprised of most combinations, except for, lotto number in position 1 I would restrict it to 1-29,..so on)...

so,for Lexico Index 380171 with Index Match 4 2 3 3 4

If I purged accordingly as such (and each position in the IndexMatch can only be 1 to 5 by the way), I would have 184 combos left

Just an outlook.

Reply #45

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:12:33 GMT

mindtab

Thanks for the input

RL

Reply #44

mindtab — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:13:36 GMT

In subgroups section, all first numbers are 1)

Subgroups:

1 ) 23030 2 ) 46060 3 ) 69090 4 ) 92120 5 ) 115150

Sub-Subgroups:

1 ) 4606 2 ) 9212 3 ) 13818 4 ) 18424 5 ) 23030

sub-sub-subgrp

1 ) 921 2 ) 1842 3 ) 2763 4 ) 3684 5 ) 4605

sub-sub-sub-subgrp

1) 84 ..........

The main group gives you position 1 Range of the Lexico, while the subgroups cover the ranges with this Range (like a breakdown) Even if gauging odd/even for each (I'll call it IndexMatch) IM positi... [ More ]

Reply #43

mindtab — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:09:17 GMT

Hello everyone.

Still reading info on the thread. Just wanted to add a tidbit here, maybe not necessarily related to the post, however, it is in relation to the Lexico.

What I have also done in my software is to divide the Lexico number, eg 575757 into groups. I divided mine into 5 groups.

Example

Groups:

1 ) 1 to 115151 2 ) 115152 to 230302 3 ) 230303 to 345453 4 ) 345454 to 460604 5 ) 460605 to 575757

Subgroups:

1 ) 23030 2 ) 46060 3 ) 69090 4 ) 92120 5 ) 115150

Reply #42

dr san — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:54:15 GMT

Hello all possible conbina oes pick4 provided no repeat digits or a lottery of 39 / 5 to hit the endings (last digit of the number) since that does not repeat

Terminations =

1234

1235

1236

1237

1238

1239

1230

1245

1246

1247

1248

1249

1240

1256

1257

1258

1259

1250

1267

1268

1269

1260

1278

1279

1270

1289

1280

1290

1345

1346

1347

1348

1349

1340

1356

1357

1358

1359

1350

1367

Reply #41

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:14:24 GMT

Here's the download link again for anyone new that's interested

http://www.box.net/shared/7d5sf6jmpx

RL

Reply #40

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:53:13 GMT

This is a after the fact setup for MO 5-39 last nights draw to demonstrate how to use the code. It does not

attempt to explain how to select the values.

WED 04/27/11 03 09 14 18 27 FL=168 RL=507

## Low to Hi

#1 = x00 TO x12

#2 = x13 TO x24

#3 = x25 TO x37

#4 = x38 TO x50

#5 = x51 TO x62

#6 = x63 TO x74

#7 = x75 TO x86

#8 = x87 TO x99

The FL value that hit was 168 so we would have needed to select (1) as the first value. This is the X value

in the l... [ More ]

Reply #39

dr san — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:00:22 GMT

Rl randonic Hello, good job on these three filters, one could calculate a closed combination

Up to 64% mathematically and the other 36% random, the lower percentage of random

Seems to work better together with conbin ao mathematics, then see having frequencies

Higher, lower and middle of each column but the calculation is for each vertical column, as

The study of the lexicon could help in the calculation of repetitions, ie the interval between repetitions

Each lottery number

Reply #38

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:20:37 GMT

The above should read

X code

0 + HLH

0 + HHL

0 + HHH

1 + LLL

1 + LLH

1 + LHL

1 + LHH

From hereon out I will refer to the 3-letter code by the digits 1 to 8

## code Low to Hi

#1 = LLL = x00 TO x12

#2 = LLH = x13 TO x24

#3 = LHL = x25 TO x37

#4 = LHH = x38 TO x50

#5 = HLL = x51 TO x62

#6 = HLH = x63 TO x74

#7 = HHL = x75 TO x86

#8 = HHH = x87 TO x99

Write this down and save it for reference

________________

## Low to Hi

#1

Reply #37

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:02:47 GMT

Another calculation that may be needed as we move along.

To calculate how many sets contain any one number from the matrix. first calculate the sets in the matrix

5-39 = 575757 now subtract 39-1 = 38.

Now calculate sets in a 5-38 = 501942.

Now subtract, 575757 - 501942 = 73815

Each number in a 5-39 game appears 73815 times

Another method. 575757 * 5 = 2878785 / 39 = 73815 Note! the 5 here is the numbers in each set.

RL

Reply #36

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:39:20 GMT

Next part. I am assuming that everyone understands so far so I will add a little more. If something

does not make since then please ask. Any question is a good question and I often miss steps so

if your having a problem then others might also.

Watch for typo's as I make many mistakes

FL / RL codes.

Remember that the software adds (0)'s to the end of the Low range

and (9)'s to the end of the high range so 000 = 000001 to 000999

for any matrix with a 6 digit lexi value... [ More ]

Reply #35

garyo1954 — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:47:17 GMT

It's all good. I laughed too. I even had a thought to put shampoo in the boat, throw the dog in and wash both at the same time.

Reply #34

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:54:26 GMT

Gary

I had to laugh about the boat because it reminded me of the three stooges when curly shot a hole in the

bottom of the boat so the water would drain, Problem was they were on the lake at the time.

RL

Reply #33

garyo1954 — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:01:09 GMT

Sounds like me at the moment. We had major storms here the last two evenings. Emptied the boat yesterday. More in it today. At least I we know if it holds water it won't leak!

Working on getting the three digit patterns as well. Thinking first three, mid three, back three to see if/where the ties are. Might work. Might be nothing more than more data that tells a lot of data things.

At one time I thought the back 5 would be worth chasing, but since we both agree they only repeat once every... [ More ]

Reply #32

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:21:42 GMT

Gary

Nice chart, My 5-39 the digits 4 0 are the worst hitters, I never checked them as a pair but I always

start with them to see if they can be blocked. Digit 5 has the best hit rate followed by 6. Base digits 1-2-3

are almost always put in play and in the old dos version there is an option that allows you to select decade

dights for each number. This reduces sets very quickly but I did not include this option in the 64 bit version.

My old bayes predictor use to go through ever... [ More ]

Reply #31

garyo1954 — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:53:38 GMT

Interesting that you mention best/worst pairings by range. Yesterday I ran the back digit pairings by position for any 5/39 game to see what came up. (In Texas we have a 5/37). Might need to run a 5/39 to compare the overall results. I highlighted the first and fifth back digits to get some idea. From the overall totals one would expect these to be true since 1 to 9 contain the largest spread. I haven't taken the time to carefully go through this yet, but it appears that digits 9, 8, 7, 6, (5) h... [ More ]

Reply #30

adamcustom — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:08:56 GMT

RL,

Thanks for your understanding. I think that some pick-3 or pick-4 players could contribute a bit with their experience with what actually works.

Some strategies of playing are based on worst/best pairings of digits in some ranges. Does it work, I do not know.

Adam

Reply #29

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:51:33 GMT

Adam

I am hoping through discussion that we can find something that will make this easier. I still have much to

add about how this can be used but as you know if we can't pick the correct values then it is all for nothing.

I was thinking that if a person could set up for 2 or 3 tight runs and then select maybe 5 sets from each

that it might pay off. I also think that the field can be narrowed down for most draws without much work.

The second number will normally be in a very smal... [ More ]

Reply #28

adamcustom — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:07:49 GMT

RL,

Pls accept my apologies as I didn't mean to be rude if that sounded so. Yes, you make decision at every step of the process. What was on my mind was actually a quest for something tangible, for example as far as selecting the first digit of FL. Let's say that my last Lexcon value was: 155448. Can this help me in any way as I have to choose in the range 0-8? And should I look at the one before the last which was 511672?

Adam

Reply #27

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:57:51 GMT

Adam

Still this leaves us with a question of using best method to set the ranges. I'm not sure if feelings would do the trick, perhaps looking at some filter values for digits, say if 1-st digit goes up 3 times in a row it should either stay at this level or fall down. Has anyone tried it with pick-3? I never played this game myself, as it's simply nonexistent where I live.

The feelings are all we have even after we look a tons of data. We feel one way or another about what we will play.... [ More ]

Reply #26

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:33:55 GMT

How to use the Lexi Calc to range the remaining numbers. First notice that I have Foward Lexi set to Low=350

and Hi set to 363 and Reverse Lexi Low=100 and Hi=125. This gives me 07 for the first number and 38 for the

fifth. Notice in the center of the screen that the starting set = 07 10 23 27 35 and the end set = 07 16 18 19 32.

Because the 5th number must be 38 the end set would need to be rolled back meaning that you must go back

until the set ends with 38. Rolling the set back t... [ More ]

Reply #25

dr san — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:45:11 GMT

Hello, rl, very good work, excellent approach, I have only one approach, ideas

If you can ok! Following is a lottery to divide into two sectors = high and low

Sector or left and right. For generation of pairs. = example of a lottery

From 01 to 39 / 5 ok the 1st number of the pair goes from 01 to 19 and the 2nd number of the pair saw 20 to 39

Well then here's peers do the same thing with pairs of left and right

After crossing the pairs, and take bets with double numbers, we have fo... [ More ]

Reply #24

Maryland — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:00:23 GMT

RL,

Always interested! Keep going as long as you can.

Reply #23

adamcustom — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:58:37 GMT

RL,

Pls count me in. I'm interested in using Lexi. Some games could be easier to set the range and some a bit harder. For example, for my 5/42 the odds for 3 digits are 1 to 850, then combined odds for 2 pick-3 games would be 1:722,500 so better than for a regular game which is 1: 850,668.

Still this leaves us with a question of using best method to set the ranges. I'm not sure if feelings would do the trick, perhaps looking at some filter values for digits, say if 1-st digit goes up... [ More ]

Reply #22

CARBOB — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:00:59 GMT

I'm very interested in this strategy and will save the code in a different folder, to use as a learning tool. Thanks

Reply #21

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:32:17 GMT

CB

If you installed the lexicalc then you don't need the code above. I posted it for those that want to play

with it and see how it makes the conversions, the Lexi.exe file has this already built in.

RL

Reply #20

CARBOB — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:31:29 GMT

RL, do I enter the code in the same folder as the lexi-calc

Reply #19

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:03:58 GMT

The lexi program has been downloaded by many people so now I want to see where we are at before I

continue this thread. As the program is, it has no way to track past results but if enough intrest is shown

I will write a database builder for this program. Each person will need to get access to a list of draws for

the game/s that they want to play. I will also add to the existing program a way to update the database

after each drawing. Here's what I had in mind. If by recording the pa... [ More ]

Reply #18

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:27:26 GMT

'CODE TO CONVERT THE NUMBERS TO LEXI

DIM SHARED NCR AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED NC1 AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED LEX1 AS DOUBLE

SETTOLEX:

CLS

'Load varibles

A = 0: B = 0: C = 0: D = 0: E = 0: F = 0:

LOCATE 1, 1: INPUT ENTER NUMBERS IN EACH SET , PICKT

IF PICKT 3 OR PICKT 6 THEN GOTO SETTOLEX

LOCATE 2, 1: INPUT ENTER MUNBERS IN MATRIX , NSET

IF NSET PICKT + 1 OR NSET 60 THEN GOTO SETTOLEX

NCR = Factorial(NSET) / (Factorial(PICKT) * Factorial(NSET - PICKT)): NCR = CLNG(N... [ More ]

Reply #17

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:26:22 GMT

A little better version

'Code to convert lexi to numbers

DIM SHARED NC1 AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED NCR AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED LEX1 AS DOUBLE

LEXTOSET:

CLS

'Load matrix varibles

LOCATE 1, 1: INPUT ENTER LEXI VALUE , LEX1

LOCATE 2, 1: INPUT ENTER NUMBERS IN EACH SET , PICKT

LOCATE 3, 1: INPUT ENTER MUNBERS IN MATRIX , NSET

IF PICKT 3 OR PICKT 6 THEN GOTO LEXTOSET

IF NSET PICKT + 1 OR NEST 60 THEN GOTO LEXTOSET

'Calculate / set varibles

NCR = Factorial(NSET... [ More ]

Reply #16

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 22:59:32 GMT

oooop's

Replace this code

DIM SHARED NCR AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED L2 AS DOUBLE

With this code

DIM SHARED NCR AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED LEX1 AS DOUBLE

DIM SHARED L4 AS DOUBLE

RL

Reply #15

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 22:19:10 GMT

Some of RL's Kun-Fu. Hope you can appreciate this code as this is my Magic ju-ju as Gary calls it. LOL

If you add both of these to one program then make sure you only copy the factorial Function once and

place it at the end of the code. It is very easy to convert this code so that a database for the forward

and reverse lexies can be made. As we move along I will try and build a universal database builder and

updater. (qb64

Reply #14

JosephusMinimus — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:57:37 GMT

Thanks Gary. I can't imagine how long it will take to download this but I'm going to do it even if I have to put the computer online at bedtime in hopes of having it finished by the time the roosters start crowing.

Reply #13

JosephusMinimus — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:42:21 GMT

Thanks RL. You are a treasure chest of helpful information and a saint for sharing your work.

Reply #12

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:14:34 GMT

Gary

Thanks for posting the pic and the download link

RL

Reply #11

garyo1954 — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:12:20 GMT

Great post RL! Good stuff. I'll have to read it carefully and keep up with everything.

Here's the link to the boxnet file right? Click the blue to get it.

Nice chart explaining the program too! Thanks

Reply #10

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:49:55 GMT

Below is a list for a 5-39 game showing the Lexigraphic value the set and the mirror set.

The mirror of a set is calculated by adding 1 to the highest number in the matrix and then

subtracting each of the 5 numbers from this value.

Lexi Normal SET Mirror set

000001 01 02 03 04 05 -- 39 38 37 36 35

000002 01 02 03 04 06 -- 39 38 37 36 34

000003 01 02 03 04 07 -- 39 38 37 36 33

000004 01 02 03 04 08 -- 39 38 37 36 32

000005 01 02 03 04 09 -- 39 38 37 36 31

000006 0... [ More ]

Reply #9

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:44:10 GMT

Hello

Below is a link to the first program, just run the setup and it's ready to go. This program is a stand alone

program and does not change any settings on your computer. It just installs the program and creates a

shortcut to run it. Just copy and paste the link below and it will take you to the download. This program

is a lexi-calculator and will be used later in this post to help explain the how I use lexigraphic values to

select my first and fifth numbers in a set. Windows... [ More ]

Reply #8

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:31:55 GMT

Still a couple more days before I can get back to this. I was able to get some of the software done so

keep checking back

RL

Reply #7

garyo1954 — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:21:31 GMT

RL,

Stay safe! Keep in touch.

Reply #6

JosephusMinimus — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:53:52 GMT

Doug MacArthur said that the night he snuck out of Corregidor in a PT boat, March 12, 1942, and left his troops to surrender to the Japanese and be entertained by the Bataan Death March. When the got back they'd all gone somewhere else.

Don't wait too long is the moral of that.

Good luck.

Reply #5

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:46:13 GMT

Just wanted to let everyone know that I got pulled away on another project and it will be a

couple days before I can get back to this. As Arnold would say, I'll be back

RL

Reply #4

garyo1954 — Sun, 17 Apr 2011 05:14:05 GMT

This is a large Excel file (21.3 Megs) but it will give everyone the opportunity to see the combinations and the lexicon equilvalents in the 5/39 games.

Click here for download.

Reply #3

garyo1954 — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:25:26 GMT

RL,

Great idea! Sounds like you are on to something that will help the Pick 3 players relate to the jackpot games. You got my help on it.

The lexicon value for each each number is derived by it's place in the overall 575,757 combinations scheme. So [01 04 07 11 24] is the 016012 combination of the 575,757.

So far so good.

I'm getting confused at the 16-29-33-36-39 LV = 541875. If the back set has 757 possible, then 875 exceeds that. How are we going to compensate

Reply #2

CARBOB — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:29:05 GMT

Thanks RL, this could be very interesting. Learning something new, sometimes helps.

Reply #1

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:56:06 GMT

Just wanted to clear something up. When I refer to the front-3 and back-3 I am really refering to the

front-3 from the original and the front-3 from the reversed lexi. The last 3 digits for both are never

used so just ignore them. From this point they will be called Foward lexi = (FL) and Reverse lexi = (RL)

RL

Lexicographic Numbers and a little math

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:39:27 GMT

Hello everyone

I am starting a new topic on lexicographic number selection in hopes of gaining some new ideas.

I have been working with lexi's for several years and will be posting links to download software

as this moves along. I hope to pull in a few pick-3 pick-4 players along the way as I think that

they may have much to say or add to this post. This might be a way for pick3/4 players to put

there skills to use for the big games and also help big-game players improve their pla... [ More ]