Is This Secret Worth IT?

Reply #15

thinktank — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:39:27 GMT

Cajun thanks a bunch.. man, even though this stuff is tidious, I realized that I was reading my tables wrong, well... rather the anamolies were happening right in my face...you too gamerguy.. i'm not going to get too excited though but your advices really opened my eyes to possiblities. What makes this stuff tidious is the subjectivity in readiing the results..

Reply #14

thinktank — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:28:14 GMT

This is tidious..

Reply #13

thinktank — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:19:09 GMT

I don't know if this is progress, but thus far, I have narrowed a number down within a group of five numbers that usually hit. For example, let say I pick 5,12, 30, 33, 34. Usually just one of those numbers out of that group usually hits in the next game. Call me greedy, but I want the rest of the 4 numbers. I'm testing my theory in a 20 trial game run. Will post results after testing. I only sample back to the last 20 games, to eliminate variables as Cajunwin4 says. Needle where are u... [ More ]

Reply #12

CajunWin4 — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:16:47 GMT

Your getting way to complicated in predictions . Simplify the system . You dont need all the draw history for predicitions .....The only time I use a large draw ( 300 - 500 ) history is for my sum totals and target range ... Some people say use the last 300 or 500 draws , i say no to many variables have changed in the past draws since the most recent draw ...

Reply #11

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:05:55 GMT

You stated that a repeated number happened about 400 times. What is the total number of times? If you have 400 draws and a games back number repeated 400 times, then you have a 100% pattern with which to work.

You might consider the fact there are repeat numbers not important but there are a few on this site that would not.

The fact there are repeat numbers can limit the field. If the ratio is higher than 50%, then you should consider including at least one repeat number in your prediction... [ More ]

Reply #10

thinktank — Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:55:01 GMT

a most repeated number happened about 400 times; however, that's not important because the numbers that repeated most, were the same numbers that had repeated most through out the entire history of the game.. So I guess this information that I have is redundant.

Reply #9

GASMETERGUY — Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:51:57 GMT

OK, then you should start looking for that needle.

Here is a question you should be able to answer. Using the Games Back numbers only, how often is there a repeated number

Reply #8

guesser — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:38:27 GMT

You won't find a perfect combo right off the bat, you MIGHT find a good combo of two or three numbers, and all the rest is pure dumb luck.

GMG is correct on looking at 'numbers' back, more often than not, two or more of the WB's that hit are ones that have not hit in 10+ games.

No, that is not a 100% fact, but 74% of the time over the last 100 games it is.

There are a ton of tendencies, anomalies, that people SHOULD notice but don't.

Reply #7

thinktank — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:18:30 GMT

thanks man Gasmeterguy for your input as I have already converted the coordinates; however, it's like a needle in hay-stack finding the perfect combinations

Reply #6

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:17:17 GMT

If I am reading your correctly you will have five co-ordinates such as (1,6), (2,9), (3,16), 4(8), (5,1) after each game.

The first number within the parenthesis will be the position and the second number would be the number of games back until that number in that position repeated.

May I suggest you discard the first number and retain the number of games back. Going by the number of games back would be tantamount to finding a second source of numbers. This second source would not be subje... [ More ]

Reply #5

Raven62 — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:40:54 GMT

5/39: 575757 Combinations

3/37: 007770 Combinations

Reply #4

thinktank — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:46 GMT

i have plenty of coordinates, and they go way back for each position, however, the history for positions 2,3, and 4 gets narrow. The coordinates I discover there only reaches up to 200 + or - 50. I know some people here will shoot the idea down, but it's just a thought

Reply #3

diamondpalace — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:53:14 GMT

Coordinate could be helpful if we can see it far back by position, and use them to track the history to see its usefullness.

Reply #2

Raven62 — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:26:10 GMT

0102_0203_0304_0405_0506_0607_0708_0809_0910_1011_1112_1213_1314_1415_1516_1617_1718_1819_1920_2021_2122_2223_2324_2425_2526_2627_2728_2829_2930_3031_3132_3233_3334_3435_3536_3637_3738_3839

0103_0204_0305_0406_0507_0608_0709_0810_0911_1012_1113_1214_1315_1416_1517_1618_1719_1820_1921_2022_2123_2224_2325_2426_2527_2628_2729_2830_2931_3032_3133_3234_3335_3436_3537_3638_3739_____

0104_0205_0306_0407_0508_0609_0710_0811_0912_1013_1114_1215_1316_1417_1518_1619_1720_1821_1922_2023_2124_2225_2326... [ More ]

Reply #1

Raven62 — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:24:06 GMT

How can it be a Secret if it's freely available for anyone to Discover?

If the 2 numbers are 01 39: Then the CA-F5 (5/39) becomes a (3/37) Game. ***advantage

Is This Secret Worth IT?

thinktank — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:16:02 GMT

Game of Relativity!

In the California fantasy 5 lottery, I discovered this anomoly! Maybe it's worth researching, or someone else already researched it, nevertheless. If you research position of numbers, and disregard randomness, this coordinate (1,4) happens 537 times. What is coordinate (1,4)? If you take any game played in the California fantasy5 Lottery, i.e., game 6021, lets say this game had winning numbers, listed from least to greatest as 17-24-25-28-39. In the first position amo... [ More ]