a Bit More About the Statistical Standard Deviation?

Reply #6

mcginnin56 — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:31:56 GMT

I tried that formula Sully, and it works like a charm! It actually gave me my new set of pick 4 numbers, for tomorrows predictions.

Think it was the n-1 squared that clarified all my confusion.

Forever in your debt,

McGinnin56

Reply #5

sully16 — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:19:43 GMT

Try the formula

The sum of x minus x bar divided by n-1 squared.

Reply #4

rdgrnr — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:05:12 GMT

Reply #3

Ronnie316 — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 02:57:51 GMT

This is a copy and paste job from another forum. The material in question is an Options trading system. Sold on CD of course. lol.lol.

Reply #2

mcginnin56 — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:57:49 GMT

I think I might have last week, during a particularly slow posting session. Ah yes...it's all coming back now.

The Statistical Standard Deviation is best applied when gaming in the Central Standard Time Zone, unless of course it's a leap year, then you'll

definitely want to stay below the meridian latitudes of the Non-Standard Deviation Sector located in the Mountain Standard Time Zone. When in

doubt, always proceed to the least resistance path of the Aeronautical section of regio... [ More ]

Reply #1

LottoBoner — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 01:37:10 GMT

Whos book? Did Todd write a book about roulette

a Bit More About the Statistical Standard Deviation?

bingo296 — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:52:48 GMT

I read your book about probability and find it very interesting. Good work. I've been a roulette player for 2 years and has wasted a lot of money on so-called winning strategies. Roulette is quite like a hobby for me now just at the time I read your book about anything which has non-zero probability would happen when trials arise .

I found two things hard to understand in your book, one is in the chapter that you introduced the Super Roulette Strategy . You mentioned a piece of word about... [ More ]