Can't Touch this... da dit dit da...

Reply #19

MADDOG10 — Sat, 29 Jun 2013 03:00:25 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening Saturday 6/22, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Sunday 6/23 - 1... [ More ]

Reply #18

MADDOG10 — Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:10:50 GMT

Reply #17

MADDOG10 — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:23:16 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Sunday 6/23 - 10 hits.

Mon... [ More ]

Reply #16

MADDOG10 — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:31:39 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Sunday 6/23 - 10 hits.

Mon... [ More ]

Reply #15

WIN D — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:04:14 GMT

Now those are hits on the Monday run aren't they? Those were sure over the expectation levels. No question about it. 17 hits ! Well over.

Reply #14

MADDOG10 — Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:37:11 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Sunday 6/23 - 10 hits.

Mon... [ More ]

Reply #13

MADDOG10 — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:21:38 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Sunday 6/23 - 10 hits.... [ More ]

Reply #12

jimjwright — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 03:02:35 GMT

No problems we are good.

Jimmy

Reply #11

helpmewin — Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:38:56 GMT

is this something you are trying to find out or are you trying to tell us something

Reply #10

WIN D — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:36:46 GMT

Jimmy..... Please don't think that you're dumb because of my post. That wasn't supposed to be the aim. It was to restate the test parameters for someone who had become confused after a time..... and re focus them back onto the original points. Normally, I enjoy reading your post.

Reply #9

jimjwright — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:18:39 GMT

I understand the point of your post, I am not dumb as you think I am and will leave it at that.

Jimmy

Reply #8

MADDOG10 — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:16:01 GMT

I have to agree WinD, Odds never change but cycles do. I only participated because I think I can beat the odds, as slight as it may be for me to accomplish this feat that is why I participated. So,

Even though I didn't actually start until after 3:00pm I just used the box's for both midday/evening, only having hit (11) times therefore not being able to beat the odds yesterday. I'll keep a running log of what happened everyday..

Saturday 6/22 - 11 hits.

Reply #7

WIN D — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 11:01:54 GMT

Seems like an unrealistic test .

It may seem that way to your experience.

You might as well have Jimmy4164 do one of his simulations .

I don't see how a Jimmy4164 simulation would fit into this particular test. That would only test Jimmy's ideas... and his idea of how to simulate his thoughts.

Not all 69 daily games will have 69 green lights for playing 30 single boxed numbers for 5 days in a row .

Those would be counted as a loss in this test. Because that is part of this part... [ More ]

Reply #6

onlymoney — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 02:59:40 GMT

I only play one dollar week on P-3.

I know you wouldn't play everyday, neither do I. I was just messing.

Reply #5

jimjwright — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 02:48:16 GMT

I don't have a system for Pick3 and Pick4 but if I created one I would not be playing every single day and it would not be based on results that happened yesterday.

Jimmy

Reply #4

onlymoney — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 02:27:12 GMT

I see alot of people waiting on cyclic data that has a high periodic rate. There is much better cyclic data that does not have a high standard deviation and periodic rate to track.

Right on the money. I'm guilty of it too no doubt. But what is that cyclic data that differs from any other observation? Don't all observations have ups and downs at the end of the day?

Unless one can be on top of the highs and lows at any given moment during any draw from any state at any given time, you'r... [ More ]

Reply #3

jimjwright — Sun, 23 Jun 2013 01:41:46 GMT

Seems like an unrealistic test. You might as well have Jimmy4164 do one of his simulations. Not all 69 daily games will have 69 green lights for playing 30 single boxed numbers for 5 days in a row. Seems like if someone accepted your conditions they are doomed to fail and don't really understand the Pick3 and Pick4 games at all.

Most lottery systems fail because they are based on random short-term events that have nothing to do with anything. You have to go much further in history than what y... [ More ]

Reply #2

helpmewin — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 21:04:19 GMT

is this the same thing as the other thread

Reply #1

MADDOG10 — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:14:23 GMT

30 boxes a day

026 048 049 058 059 067 068 069 078 147

148 149 158 159 168 189 246 247 248 249

258 279 459 468 489 579 589 678 679 789

Can't Touch this... da dit dit da...

WIN D — Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:48:34 GMT

Can Anyone Beat the ODDS ?

Pick 3..... Using a 365 draw Game.

The odds say..... If you want to hit at least one single Box number//// ONE TIME per Week....... you should play at least 25/30 plays per game.

That's 210 plays per week. This ONE HIT per week would be the NORMAL expected hit rate ....using around 30 plays per game.

If you think you can do better than normal ........and that you are the one that does better than once a week here ya go.

If any... [ More ]