Would you use a system that generated 343 straights (for Pick 3)?

Reply #35

Igamble — Wed, 04 Dec 2013 03:59:59 GMT

BY using the Igamble S guarantee which is =eliminating a LOT of the Straights that came for same particular day and time (MONDAY MIDDAY)you play in your state -eliminate at least 750 of the straights and you the player or gambler R GUARANTEED to win straight and the few times you miss it b/c it was drawn same day ,same time from the pool you just extracted and eliminated ....yea they do that every now and then ...will not count towards the big picture. Do the research ,reap the profit .

The i... [ More ]

Reply #34

Lucky Loser — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:00:46 GMT

Well, first of all, let's get the number count and payout in check in relevance to what we're discussing. Now, (343) is the TOTAL number count, and, @ .25/number the cost is $85.75 and the payout is $225 online okay. This is a straight play, per the title, and the profit seen here is actually $139.25....still great. If you play this same total set of (343) numbers @ $1/number, the cost is $343 as we're dealing with quarters here. The payout on a $1 straight play is $900, and, the profit now seen... [ More ]

Reply #33

mjwinsmith — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 04:20:03 GMT

Pick 3

Statistic Current Month Last Month Current Year Last Year Lifetime

Picks 1,908 50,632 546,358 578,922 5,546,519

Hits 16 273 2,903 3,082 27,474

Hit Ratio 0.84% 0.54% 0.53% 0.53% 0.50%

Winnings $1,750 $23,650 $274,280 $288,210 $2,741,930

Prize Ratio 91.72% 46.71% 50.20% 49.78% 49.44

Reply #32

grwurston — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 04:04:26 GMT

I think what scares most people is spending the $343 to make a $157 profit. The 343 is way out of most peoples budget. I

understand the premise of playing that many numbers to give yourself a greater chance of hitting, but don't you think the

list could be reduced by playing numbers that have a better probability of hitting. Singles over doubles and triples is the

most obvious way of course. But if you are picking your spots so to speak, I would think a smaller list would be just as... [ More ]

Reply #31

Lucky Loser — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 03:01:54 GMT

You, my friend, have the REQUIRED UNDERSTANDING of both this game and the mathematics to win and be successful at it. I have tried my best in many a posts to get players to understand what's really going here in terms of number count and efficiency. I couldn't have said any of this better myself if I had even rehearsed it (100) times. Excellent post.

L.L.

Reply #30

lottolaughs — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 02:47:14 GMT

People are scared when they see that many combinations. To me,343 is very realistic. To win with just 10 numbers is pretty unrealistic in the world of systems. When I offer even 40 or 50 numbers I know I've lost most people's attention but realistically you have to put out some real bucks to get any return in lottery games. Unless,of course,you just get lucky.

Reply #29

retxx — Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:37:44 GMT

how about you throwing out the system and have everyone come up with their ideas about decreasing the amount of play to a conservative number. You would be surprised at what the brains here can do. lol

sleep on it.

Reply #28

Lucky Loser — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 05:47:40 GMT

Thanks, Stack. I understand a little better now. So, in your opinion, how much does the average player here spend when playing? Do they actually play daily and every draw? Are they keeping track of each play, its' total cost, losses, and what they recover in the event of a hit whether boxed or straight? I mean, a person can spend $5 a day between both draws and if they fail to get just a box hit within (8) days for a $40 payout, they're in the hole from jump street. Repeat this for yet another... [ More ]

Reply #27

LottoBoner — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:57:54 GMT

If winning with ten combinations is absurd, then your system is asinine.

You should define what you mean by consistently .

Determinism? Is this a waste of time college philosophy class?

Your original question should have been, Would you play a pair system in pick 4? !!!!!!

20 combinations? You must be absurd!!!!

If the profit margin is very slim, then take a chance and play online!!! Take a GAMBLE!!!!!

Don't worry about being robbed!!! Its not like you are actually going to wi... [ More ]

Reply #26

LottoBoner — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:51:48 GMT

Maybe they are collecting bottles and cans

Reply #25

LottoBoner — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:50:13 GMT

You are definately an optimist.

Reply #24

Stack47 — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:20:15 GMT

I didn't think I needed to amend my remarks, but if it helps I will; Back in the day many LP members would be interested in DISCUSSING this system .

Would you rather discuss the pros and cons of paying cash for your dream house or discuss the possibilities of actually picking the correct combos to win a jackpot

Reply #23

Stack47 — Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:12:26 GMT

My point was topics like this means absolutely nothing to the majority of LP members. We have members who think a 50 cent box is a huge bet.

Reply #22

Lucky Loser — Sun, 01 Dec 2013 16:12:46 GMT

interested in such a scheme?

So, is this word being used as a noun or verb here? One way it's positive and other is negative.

L.L.

Reply #21

RJOh — Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:49:40 GMT

At $343 a drawing, a 75% success rate would show a profit, but that means nothing to the $1 or $2 jackpot game QP players who make up the majority of active LP members. Back in the day many LP members would be interested in this system, but not our current active membership.

What ever happened to that group that back in the day that would have been interested in such a scheme? Did they go broke and drop out

Reply #20

Lucky Loser — Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:32:46 GMT

If 343 combos are producing an exact match every drawing, it's a 45% profit every drawing making it unnecessary to risk filtering the 343 combos.

This is true, but the (343) number set can be filtered down further without too much risk. Also, he needs not play every draw...this is where players get nowhere real fast. The true numbers here represent something a lot more important than just profit, although, the profit is very important. They actually go hand in hand.

After questioned, we fi... [ More ]

Reply #19

RJOh — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:27:48 GMT

Capitalism=Every man earns for himself and succeeds.

Liberalism=Just give it away to everybody that doesn't deserve it.

Think about that hard and long, buddy.

I have, that is the reason when someone ask such a question I know it's BS.

Reply #18

Stack47 — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:09:26 GMT

I can only eliminate 3 or 4 numbers in each spot using this method; hence, I get 7x7x7 = 343 numbers. This works everytime

The question was based on an assumption the system could eliminate three digits in each digit position and produce the winning combo every drawing.

but the obvious issue is that there are too many combinations to play and I do not like to filter as its seems to elimate winning numbers many times.

If 343 combos are producing an exact match every drawing, it's a 45% p... [ More ]

Reply #17

ranman17 — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 20:34:30 GMT

Well said

Reply #16

Lucky Loser — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:54:19 GMT

First of all, the OP need not predict, post, or test anything for anyone to see. He simply asked if anyone would use a system which generated the str8 picks and the general consensus is 'NO' from what I'm seeing. So be it. The only person that needs to understand what, how, why, when, and where the system does its' thing is THE OP. More than likely, he only wanted to see what kind of responses he'd get and why. I can clearly see that most here don't understand what he's working towards, and ther... [ More ]

Reply #15

SergeM — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:31:50 GMT

Test it for twenty drawings.

Make a sheet with costs and income.

Everytime that you simulate: -343

Everytime that you win: +500

Make the total of costs and wins.

Make the difference and post it.

Finally ask yourself why you posted the question while you could find the answer yourself.

Also ask yourself why you would ask us without giving us your program and your classes.

How can anyone check on bugs in your system or calculation if nobody but you knows anything about it

Reply #14

ranman17 — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:20:37 GMT

I agree and I am VERY interested in your program(s) (cooltalker and Lucky Loser).

I certainly subscride to the notion that if you have to play 343 numbers each and every draw (let's call it 343 $1 str8 tickets) to win $500 each and every draw for a profit of $157.00 this is akin to buying money and I would do that all day long. However the system would have to prove out at around 86% (this would allow for 2 loses per week) this would leave you with a profit $1,512.00 per week. I wouldn't... [ More ]

Reply #13

cash4ninja — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:20:33 GMT

What's your strategy

Reply #12

Stack47 — Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:59:20 GMT

I am satisfied that I can go from 1000 combinations down to 343 with a 90% success rate.

And I'm still trying to figure out how anyone can get a 90% success rate with a 65.7% chance of losing every bet. If they really have something, predict seven digits in each digit position for 10 drawings.

Reply #11

HHEH-100 — Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:07:00 GMT

I would and here's why: $500-$343 =$157 profit; $157 profit 30 days =$ 4,710 month;$4,710 12 months =$ 56,520 tax free money!!! (Based upon you only purchasing one ticket, could be more if you doubled up once you started winning

Reply #10

cash4ninja — Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:28:56 GMT

I gree... I agree...

Reply #9

cooltalker — Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:46:10 GMT

Thanks for your words, L.L.

I completely agree with you. Hoping to win consistently with 10 combination is truly absurd.

Ideally speaking, all possible 1000 combinations have equal likelihood of coming up, however, all we can do is eliminate combinations based on what actually occurs in most cases. Suggesting that one can eliminate 990 possible combinations would be an extremely strong evidence for determinism.

In the end, the goal is to create a probability model with a high succes rat... [ More ]

Reply #8

Lucky Loser — Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:49:55 GMT

cooltalker, contrary to what you may think about it being too many numbers along with other opinions here, you're headed in the right direction. Also, you're probably closer than 90% of the players here to developing a very, very consistent system. I understand the concept of wanting to play the absolute least amount of numbers possible but, that comes with a price as well...and that price is inconsistency and losing until luck finds you. You're well under the threshold of a properly balanced sy... [ More ]

Reply #7

helpmewin — Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:53:31 GMT

I hope I can find another system

you came to the right place

Reply #6

cooltalker — Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:14:11 GMT

Sorry for not clarifying everybody, but this system generate the winning numbers almost all the time even when triples are drawn! That's the only reason why the question came up.

But I would not use this system by itself, since it is too many combinations. I hope I can find another system in conjuction that works well.

Reply #5

CajunWin4 — Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:29:49 GMT

No . I would rather use a System/Method that generates 8 Straights for Pick 3

Reply #4

helpmewin — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:53:18 GMT

Yes

Reply #3

cash4ninja — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 13:40:49 GMT

Yes.....

Reply #2

Igamble — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:33:02 GMT

LB ,I am good with extracting the winning numbers and having very few sets .BUT how exactly orr what criterias you use to time the hit and wait it out-due/hot pairs /traveller numbers from neighbouring states /traveller pairs/vtracs sum due or vtrac HOT repeater nr. ,instinct ?i missed a few good ones and tryng to find the errors.well one was that i was cheap and i dindt play them ..

Thanks

ANSwer to the topic is NO -unless if playing online -that will b around 85bucks.draw ,so you mu... [ More ]

Reply #1

LottoBoner — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:03:38 GMT

NO.

A good system should produce a very small set of numbers. At most ten. And that is kind of overdoing it.

Its better to find a good number (that task and how they do it is up to the player), time it, wait it out, save your money and then pounce when the time is right.

Would you use a system that generated 343 straights (for Pick 3)?

cooltalker — Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:02:57 GMT

After spending 3 months trying to develop my own system, I have come up with what I believe to be my best.

My system is based on checking which numbers, if they do come up, will or will not match past distributions when grouped into different sequences. I have written a program to do this, otherwise it would take 20+ hours to this on excel, since I go and check back upto the last 1000 drawings. (I will not get into the method, since it will take me hours to explain the algorithm in details.