Unbiased testing

Reply #5

SergeM — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:03:46 GMT

I simulated bulk play and it won. It still is luck. When it goes wrong, it is costing a lot of money.

Reply #4

manual — Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:12:03 GMT

sigh, found a bug, hits went down when I re-tested. It would've still been slightly profitable (2k for the year) if played online but that's a lot of work for such a small amount. This is why it's good to have a sanity check. Ah well, I'll keep at it.

Reply #3

manual — Fri, 28 Mar 2014 01:01:32 GMT

I actually forgot about that... Carry overs was a good method but I've moved on. I should program that into this testing code. See how often it hits, how many days off, etc.

Reply #2

Blackapple — Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:37:45 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/264596

Anything related to

Reply #1

helpmewin — Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:01:08 GMT

Welcome Back

Unbiased testing

manual — Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:57:14 GMT

So I took a bit of a break from lottery stuff. Didn't have the time. Of course, I love testing theories so it was only a matter of time. Since I've been back , I've been testing patterns. They seems to treat me much better than trying to predict. From there, I've just spent time going through the Florida numbers, testing various patterns to see if it would be worth playing. Then it occurred to me that I could just code the testing itself for the patterns. It tooks some work but I finished it. Th... [ More ]