The NEW Pick 3 Hot Doubles Trap revealed

Reply #43

perfectsss — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:34:09 GMT

YOU ARE RIGHT ranman17 because I am NEW here and this is throwing me off and scratching my head ha this is what a ROOKIE like myself does not need when learning TODD NEEDS TO BUILD AN AMUSEMENT SECTION FOR LOTTERY AS WELL this is money we're talking about and I must say that this is notfunny my friend and I AM NOT HERE TO MAKE ENEMIES . EVERBODY HAVE A GREAT DAY PEACE.

Reply #42

Pick3Guy — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:15:18 GMT

Well, mmx1, your apology is accepted and you deserve a lot of respect for making such an unpopular admission. Probably, most people wouldn't have done so ,in this case, for any number of reasons. So, this shows you have character.

Anyway, I'm wondering what you misunderstood about my original post. Was it with step #3 or something else? So, if you could let me know it would be helpful. But, at the time, I've tried to be as clear as I can. Still, I knew there might be some confusion with step... [ More ]

Reply #41

mmx1 — Sat, 29 Nov 2014 03:09:52 GMT

Pick3Guy

After reviewing this thread I have to admit my rude reaction was based on my misunderstanding of your original post and not valid any more as such.

I understand your frustration and reaction. I am sorry about that.

Still don't accept giving 5 stars to yourself but would like to pull back my rating which is impossible.

I am not saying your idea is good or bad. This post is not about that.

Reply #40

Pick3Guy — Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:32:38 GMT

Well, you really need to stop the nonsense with all your twisting. For one thing, I've made it ,abundantly, clear how my method works and you still get it twisted. But, any normal human would understand how it ,basically, works. On top of that, you've put words in my mouth. Now, if you check my original post you'd know I didn't mislead anyone. So, knock it off.

Reply #39

Pick3Guy — Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:14:11 GMT

Well, that could be said about anything we play. As mentioned, we don't know when anything ,doubles or otherwise, will hit. So, why single out doubles? But, how would you know what my profit looks like? Fyi, I ,usually, spend hundreds of dollars on each play. Now, if you don't believe me you can go look at my winning tickets from a couple of months back.

Reply #38

mmx1 — Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:34:22 GMT

You're giving 5 stars to yourself. You must be a kid using this forum for your no sense provocative posts.

You don't accept obvious facts that any normal human would accept and say, no problem, I tried, it doesn't work.

You started this thread with big words on revealing a better strategy than WIN-D did and now saying that you've never said this is a winning strategy.

You have already degraded popularity of this forum.

Todd should review your behaviour and relationship with othe... [ More ]

Reply #37

lakerben — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:00:35 GMT

This isn't the first doubles thread on this forum. Since the game is supposedly random who can really tell when a double hits? The stats don't work for every state. And when it does will it be the right double and the third digit. If not you have a $5 win for a front or back pair. So why even bother to re-hash this double mania?..

Reply #36

Pick3Guy — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:39:53 GMT

Well, you've got it all twisted. First of all, there was never any claim of this being a winning strategy. In fact, I've stated that this method ,just like Win D's doubles trap, is susceptible to freak losing streaks. I'm just trying to clear up any confusion and show you ,and others, how my strategy works. So, don't put words in my mouth.

Anyway, there is no new strategy being shown. Although, if there is any change then I will make it known. But, for now, the strategy is ,and has been, to... [ More ]

Reply #35

mmx1 — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:25:50 GMT

Still trying to prove your idea as a winning strategy, interesting ....

Start from the oldest drawing 1. ---939---

Your strategy is:

count 4 consecutive singles after any double or triple

start betting all doubles (90 box combos) next 4 drawings or stop if you get double or triple

Why did you start playing after 7 instead of 4 consecutive singles?

What is the new strategy you have applied here?

How much you'd have spent and won? How many winnings?

17. 09... [ More ]

Reply #34

Pick3Guy — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 06:47:37 GMT

Well, just to clarify, my examples are when playing the entire set of doubles.

Reply #33

Pick3Guy — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 05:54:13 GMT

Well, my betting strategy is playing doubles ,for the very next draw, after the first appearance of either a double or triple. In this example, the entire set of doubles is played.

Step 1 : Shown in blue

Step 2 : Shown in green

Step 3 : Shown in red

400. ---886---

399. ---099---

398. 809------

397. 971------

396. 549------

395. ---559---

394. 837------

393. 506------

392. ---332---

391. 059------ L

390. ---554---

389. 397------

388... [ More ]

Reply #32

destinycreation — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:05:21 GMT

So, if that draw is a double(i.e. there are now two consecutive doubles) then I win. But, if it's a single then I lose.

You don't Win, playing a DOUBLE, unless you play the RIGHT DOUBLE, with the Correct 3rd Number.

Reply #31

Pick3Guy — Tue, 25 Nov 2014 01:48:55 GMT

Well, unless either a double or triple comes out, you can play doubles for up to 4 drawings. But, the first two steps should be clear enough. So, you'd wait for the first either double or triple and then play doubles, at any chosen point(s), during the next 4 drawings.

Anyway, my chosen point is the very next draw after the first appearance of either a double or triple. So, if that draw is a double(i.e. there are now two consecutive doubles) then I win. But, if it's a single then I lose. Now... [ More ]

Reply #30

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:14:34 GMT

So, in your example, how ,exactly, are you getting the key 1380

Reply #29

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:27:54 GMT

Well, apparently, you're the one who's trying to stir the pot. So, you can believe what you want, but it doesn't mean that Tia, or anyone else, has to. Fyi, there's no joking around or ,for that matter, any malicious intent . Anyway, all you do on these threads is twist everything to try and convince others of what you want them to believe. In other words, you're just a troublemaker.

Reply #28

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:12:18 GMT

Well, again, there's no distinction made between midday and evening draws with my method. But, just to be clear, there are ,up to, 3 skips with the method.

Reply #27

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:56:55 GMT

Well, there's no distinction made between midday and evening draws with my method. Also, I don't know how you chose to play with step 3. So, you'd need to be more specific and ,also, show us.

Reply #26

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:57:01 GMT

Well, usually, I just do both front and back pairs for doubles.

Reply #25

mmx1 — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:24:48 GMT

at any given point(s), up to 4 plays, unless either

You're changing strategy from 3 to 4 plays, but that doesn't work either.

You'd be loosing more.

Everybody can count red and green ones bellow.

You're not giving it up, interesting ...

Again, this is for NY 400 last combined draws.

400. ---886---

399. ---099---

398. 809------

397. 971------

396. 549------

395. ---559---

394. 837------

393. 506------

392. ---332---

391. 059------

390. ---554... [ More ]

Reply #24

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:47:30 GMT

Well, that's pretty much correct. You'd be waiting for the first appearance of either a double or triple, following 4 or more singles. Also, with regard to step 3, if they're are 3 consecutive singles it can still be a play with doubles. So, if another single comes out(i.e. there are now 4 consecutive singles) then you'd stop playing.

Example:

... 478, 561, 690, 421, 554, 613, 217, 635, 726

In this example, we have ,at least, 4 consecutive singles ,with 478, 561, 690, 421 (i.... [ More ]

Reply #23

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:18:02 GMT

Well, that's really great to hear. Thanks for the positive feedback

Reply #22

garyo1954 — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:27:54 GMT

.....AND JUST TO BE CLEAR.....

NO MATTER HOW YOU PLAY DOUBLES , IT LOSES.

I applaud your posting the numbers. And maybe I was wrong. Perhaps you aren't one of those facebook ninjas who want to post crap just to stir the pot.

G

Reply #21

Pick3Guy — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 05:48:56 GMT

Well, you can twist it all you want, but you're ,most likely, not fooling anyone. Still, just to be clear, you're playing doubles.

Reply #20

mmx1 — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 05:14:18 GMT

This is how I understood your idea.

It doesn't seem to work at all.

It worked better just in the last 70 draws (~1 month) but still poor.

400. ---886---

399. ---099---

398. 809------

397. 971------

396. 549------

395. ---559---

394. 837------

393. 506------

392. ---332---

391. 059------

390. ---554---

389. 397------

388. 840------ 4th

387. 124------ 3rd

386. 563------ 2nd

385. 580------ 1st

384. ---522---

383. 528------

382. 147... [ More ]

Reply #19

mmx1 — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 04:23:23 GMT

One more idea without analysis results.

Could you highlight NY drawings you would have played using your strategy please?

It would ne nice to see your betting strategy as well.

Last 400 NY combined drawings, newest on top:

400. ---886---

399. ---099---

398. 809------

397. 971------

396. 549------

395. ---559---

394. 837------

393. 506------

392. ---332---

391. 059------

390. ---554---

389. 397------

388. 840------

387. 124------

386. 563... [ More ]

Reply #18

garyo1954 — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 01:11:29 GMT

EXACTLY!

Corky needs to post some precise, clear, instructions that we can verify.

Are you playing doubles after the first double? Or singles?

G

Reply #17

destinycreation — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:45:50 GMT

The way you worded Step # 3, Play at the same chosen point(s) ,each time, up to 3 consecutive singles, doesn't make any sense to me.

Did you mean to say, Play DOUBLES, after 4 consecutive singles, for up to 3 drawings ???

Your Step # 2, waiting for the First Double to appear, after 4 Consecutive Singles, implies that, in Step # 3, you would be playing the NEXT Double to appear after the 1st Double, for up to 3 drawings. [This will probably be a different DOUBLE].

Is this correct

Reply #16

Pick3Guy — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:56:38 GMT

Well, it seems there may be a little confusion with step 3,and what is really meant. So, just to clarify, you can play at the same chosen point(s) until there are 4 consecutive singles. At this point, you'd ,already, have completed step 1 and then so on. But, take notice how the percentages of doubles decrease as you go out. That is, they go from 28%, to 20%, and then to 13%. So, as this continues, this points to playing singles.

Anyway, with regard to your question, the following data has b... [ More ]

Reply #15

adobea78 — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:36:16 GMT

Example of predictive method which is innate using the concept of sequential difference

CAL

Drawing Date Pick 3 Pick 4

Midday Evening Midday Evening

Sun, Nov 23, 2014 4-5-8

Sat, Nov 22, 2014 4-7-4 7-6-9 3-8-3-6

Fri, Nov 21, 2014 2-1-1 4-2-0 3-0-9-0

Thu, Nov 20, 2014 5-2-8 5-7-9 8-0-8-6

Wed, Nov 19, 2014 6-2-0 7-8-5 7-8-0-0

Tue, Nov 18, 2014 0-8-0 4-8-4 3-8-1-8

Mon, Nov 17, 2014 3-0-0 1-8-8 2-0-5-5

Sun, Nov 16, 2014 9-4-6 0-0-4 8-9-6-0

Sat,... [ More ]

Reply #14

garyo1954 — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:12:41 GMT

No offense Tia, but this whole post is a farse. Total BS post.

Can't hit doubles playing singles and everybody on this site KNOWS that.

And he knows what he wrote.

I was asked the other day to join a facebook group to light this place up, meaning LP. I made every excuse not to join. Apparently there are a few who want to post this type stuff for the fun of it.

I'm all for laughing, joking, kidding, but posting something to confuse (new) members or just to argue is not my style.... [ More ]

Reply #13

adobea78 — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:42:12 GMT

Why this ' back and forth' who's right or wrong? waging doubles or singles is subjective, stats is not a predictive method, is just a guild. The best approach is a predictive tool that's innate with all these parameters(percentiles of singles or doubles)-That's I don't go out looking for singles or doubles, the predictive tool will decide.

Why do a wager opt for only 'double' bet? maybe high returns or cost management, is stats the only method to control cost for optimal returns? what about t... [ More ]

Reply #12

grwurston — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:13:09 GMT

One thing I had played around with a few years back, basically just out of curiosity, was tracking what days of the week each

dbl hit on mid and eve. I had done it over a 4 or 5 year span I think . It was surprising how the numbers seemed to favor

certain days over others. Some days would pull way ahead and eventually the way behind days would begin to catch up.

Like anything else, over the very long term everything will even out. Each dbl had from 80-110 dbls on each draw when I

sto... [ More ]

Reply #11

grwurston — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:45:31 GMT

I don't know.

Reply #10

doodoohead — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:40:07 GMT

Where are his numbers? Where are all of his studies on several different states? Show his 4 skips without then play 3 draws claims. Other work is all being done by other people. Nice way to have work done for you. Let's see his results.

4 skips then play 3 draws. Not much better or worth better than 50/50 is not worth a mention.

Reply #9

grwurston — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:36:46 GMT

I had done the same thing for Md. with separate draws from Feb 2005 thru June 2012. There were 722 dbls on Mid

and 712 on Eve. After 0, 1 and 2 skips, there were 207,135,101 hits on mid and 202,142,126 hits on eve. A dbl hit again

61% and 66% respectively within 3 skips. Just to clarify, the skips were immediately after a dbl hit.

Reply #8

doodoohead — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:28:52 GMT

This is a total failure. He shows nothing but his words. Nothing to back up his big words and empty claims. Show the numbers or it means NOTHING. Anyone can say almost anything they want. Unless they show numbers of any kind to back it up you are foolish to take it as real. Showing is better than saying.

This is his 3rd try at this using his big words without any back up numbers. Talk is just talk and he can't even tell you how many doubles his state had last year.

.

Here's an actua... [ More ]

Reply #7

ranman17 — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 20:00:48 GMT

Hi Pick3Guy,

How do you arrive at your double sets? (Play sets)

Thanks,

ranman

Reply #6

Pick3Guy — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:30:47 GMT

Well, that's only a small part of it. But, you're welcome. Anyway, since I've been knocking Win D's doubles trap, I felt it was important to provide a valid alternative.

Reply #5

Tialuvslotto — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:52:49 GMT

Hi Gary,

I interpreted P3G's system as follows:

1) Wait for a double to hit after at least 4 consecutive singles

2) Play doubles for the next 3 games.

I think his point 3) means that you play doubles the next 3 games, with a single result being a system fail and a double result being a system success. So my stats were just the skip 0, 1, 2 stats for doubles.

Reply #4

Lildarryl — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:47:27 GMT

best system ever posted on lotterypost. Omg. I've backtest it. And it works all states. Omg.

Reply #3

garyo1954 — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:37:59 GMT

Tia,

How are you counting this convoluted nonsense?

Combined in simple English, 1), 2), and 3) read:

When you see 4 or more consecutive singles, followed by a double or triple, play 3 consecutive singles.

You can't trap doubles playing singles. NEVER going to work.

And that is not a 'freak losing streak,' that's total design failure.

A TRAP is designed to TRAP (something). This is not a (doubles) TRAP. Its a misapplication of the term TRAP.

G

Reply #2

Tialuvslotto — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 13:06:43 GMT

Interesting, P3G!

Counting all doubles in my combined game I get 28% that hit on the first game after a hit, 20% that hit on the second game and 13% that hit on the 3rd game. So 62% of doubles hit in that 3 game window.

Does your technique of waiting for at least 4 consecutive singles before playing improve on those statistics, or are they pretty much constant

Reply #1

Lildarryl — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 08:54:49 GMT

what finally made u reveal your Award Winning System...thanks

The NEW Pick 3 Hot Doubles Trap revealed

Pick3Guy — Sun, 23 Nov 2014 03:45:31 GMT

Well, there have been many references made to a new doubles trap and this is it. But, unlike Win D's doubles trap, the hot doubles trap is designed to target those doubles that occur early on. As mentioned, Win D's doubles trap is really a singles trap and ,so, the hot doubles trap solves this problem.

Now, don't be fooled by the simplicity of the hot doubles trap. The logic supporting it is valid and ,for that matter, unrelated to that of Win D's doubles trap. Also, despite the name, there... [ More ]