<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Lotto 6/49. How many numbers will there be left if you remove all funny patterns?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/283964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Lotto 6/49. How many numbers will there be left if you remove all funny patterns?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3900016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3900016</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 02:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>maringoman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>649 lotto games have 1:12M odds so removing a few combos is akin buying extra tickets thinking you&#x27;re improving your odds. TBH you are but not by much.<br /><br />I love 649 games so I&#x27;m interested in your threads newtolottoagain. The strategy that I prefer most is choosing 4 key numbers and filling the 2 positions with random numbers. I can across this strategy while reading Cash 5 strategies right here in LP. Good luck. Let&#x27;s win this</p>]]></description>
			<category>maringoman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899353</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899353</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>newtolottoagain</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Replying to your edit, that guy is me. I had to create a new account, and well, not all the time, just been happening for the last 7 draws in a row since I started picking numbers over quick pick. I noticed you questioned me in that thread but overlooked replying to you as I actually explained it in a prior post that you probably missed, and it wasn&#x27;t really important anyway, but sorry about that.</p>]]></description>
			<category>newtolottoagain</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899351</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899351</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have no way of defining funny patterns for any lottery let alone those of Classic Lotto. If you do for your lottery then good luck and I hope you win a big jackpot.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899343</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899343</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>newtolottoagain</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If it helps, I was going to type I looked at the history of my lottery but realized that may sound too bias towards just one example, so I rephrased it to using a RNG (because I did just use the one from random dot org just to convince myself further). In any case, are you implying that Ohio Classic Lotto&#x27;s results have funny patterns frequently or something?<br /><br />In any case, regarding my belief that there are more random looking numbers... seems like a long stretch but do you think there&#x27;s a... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899343">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>newtolottoagain</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899338</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899338</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Why run a RNG when you can download the actual history of 649 lotteries? Ohio Classic Lotto has had 1236 drawings since it started and I&#x27;m comparing what you post to that list. LP has the history all US games and some of the games from other countries. The facts are there, they don&#x27;t have to be debated.<br /><br />**Note: There is a thread started by a guy from your area of the world who claims he&#x27;s matching 3 and 4 all the time, you might check his post.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899331</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899331</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>newtolottoagain</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s probably not unique, but I would admit I&#x27;m just a newbie in general, still pretty young and I&#x27;m not a math person. I&#x27;m also not intending to get into math just to play the lottery, right now I&#x27;m just using very basic logic to go by and would gladly be proven wrong by someone more knowledgable about my logic.<br /><br />What I&#x27;m basing my belief on is the fact that I can run a random number generator 100 times and maybe 5 times I&#x27;ll see something like 10, 11, 12, 13, 27, 40. Maybe I&#x27;ll go as far... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899331">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>newtolottoagain</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899315</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964/3899315</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately what you believe isn&#x27;t worth crap, it what you know that counts. I&#x27;ve only studied one 6/49 game and it&#x27;s the one I play. I&#x27;ve read several of your posts about 6/49 games and so far nothing you&#x27;ve mentioned come close to being true for Ohio&#x27;s Classic Lotto(6/49), the game I play.<br /><br />I can only conclude that the 649 game you&#x27;re playing is unique or you&#x27;ve never played or studied a 649 game.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lotto 6/49. How many numbers will there be left if you remove all funny patterns?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>newtolottoagain</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In lottery 6/49, I always hear the fact that EVERY combination is possible. That 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is just as likely to occur as 12, 19, 23, 24, 33, 45.<br /><br />But I always had this belief, if you ask me to choose between those two and assure me one of them will win, I will choose the latter. Because yes, while it is equally possible for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 to win, but it is less realistic to expect it to. That is because (I believe) there are more random looking combinations than the otherwise, so s... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/283964">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>newtolottoagain</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

