How can I validate my system is getting closer to picking better numbers?

Reply #11

SergeM — Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:29:09 GMT

Consider a lucky streak missing the jackpot with many combinations and getting many second prizes

Reply #10

RJOh — Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:40:42 GMT

I've never seen a game with a payout structure that made that possible but I am guessing there may be schemers that would claim it is using their system.

Reply #9

Igamble — Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:48:33 GMT

The big 2 issues -WHAT numbers will b the winning ones

and WHEN they will appear ...

Solving both is challenging and can b rewarding.One without the other is useless. Time frame,$ invested ...WHAT numbers ..and WHEN !

A lot of systems to solve the WHAT ..but for WHEN not much work put in. Maybe skips -average skip or highest skip ...play on the high skip ..you b waiting for a while...do it for the avg. skip maybe you loose a few times and win other times...profit ? maybe yes ,maybe no... [ More ]

Reply #8

SergeM — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:12:53 GMT

That could be easier to realize then winning a jackpot.

Reply #7

garyo1954 — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:03:41 GMT

The real question in validating your theory is how well is your determination of hotness and coldness working?

In generating 1000 permutations, if you are not weighting the hotness and coldness, then there would be no way to determine the validity.

Your post sounds like an attempt to trap numbers. And there is nothing wrong with that. A single trap can be misleading since trends, flows, and skips are not set in stone. Look for a convergence of several traps.

Reply #6

RJOh — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:08:30 GMT

Are you one of those dreamers who think one can have a monthly income playing the lotteries

Reply #5

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:05:06 GMT

GM

You can stimulate a RNG to simulate the draw history for a game but the problem is that

you still have to decide when to play some value. Jade has posted some good stuff on

this and I suggest you study his recent post. There are many ways to analyze how your

system is doing overall just look for the places it missed and see if anything can be done

to improve the outcome.

RL

Reply #4

Igamble — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:12:48 GMT

good filter =system validated

Reply #3

Igamble — Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:10:35 GMT

Pretty good filter Goggiemoogie

Reply #2

SergeM — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 20:15:14 GMT

Winning net like $ 2000 every month is as nice as a jackpot. Maybe a bit stressful.

Reply #1

RJOh — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:31:40 GMT

The results of your picks will speak for themselves. The more they win the closer your are. You've hit your target when you win a jackpot.

How can I validate my system is getting closer to picking better numbers?

GoogilyMoogily — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:42:03 GMT

MegaMillions... Numbers appearing in ( ) represent the ball number in terms of the conversation, except the spreadsheet formula.

I'm going into this knowing that it's impossible to pick random numbers. Be that as it may, still having fun trying to develop a program to create a pool of numbers to draw from. I prefer cold numbers over hot numbers. I am thinking along the lines of a coin toss in that the same side of coin becomes increasingly less possible to get consecutively over time. If... [ More ]