The pitfalls of using a system

Reply #8

str8ca$hhomie — Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:09:18 GMT

Keep your eye on the prize

Reply #7

RJOh — Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:06:01 GMT

I'm waiting until I win a jackpot to start another thread The Rewards of using the RJOh system . I came close in 2013 when posting 10 predictions for the same game and matched 5of6 for $1500.

Reply #6

SilverLion — Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:55:27 GMT

Maybe you should re-title this thread The Pitfalls of using the RJOh system

Reply #5

RJOh — Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:02:47 GMT

Classic Lotto is a 6/49 game so its matrix has 13,983,816 possible combinations. CL had 1391 drawings each which had 15 combinations of fives combined with the other 44 numbers produced 918,060 combinations I was filtering out or 6.5% of the possible combinations. Since CL 1391 drawings had only match five of previous drawings 18 times or 1.3% of the time, perhaps I was filtering out too many combinations.

There is always another game to be played. Tonight I will be trying my luck at Ohio's n... [ More ]

Reply #4

phileight — Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:34:17 GMT

RJ had you not used that filter, how many comb would you have had? you most likely would have used a different filter to get to your play budget.

The point is any filter will sometimes remove the winning comb. If the filter only removes 1 digit from the matrix sooner or later it will fail you.

we can only be as selective as our resources allow and make as informed choices as possible, hope for a lot of luck, then live with the results.

Reply #3

SergeM — Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:10:06 GMT

You know, in a pick 5 game you can have 4 numbers repeating. Why don't you play repetitions for pick 5? Eventually we get a full repeat like in some pick 6 lottos. You could filter like not more than 5 repeating numbers and your RNG will do correctly for pick 5.

Reply #2

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:24:10 GMT

RJ

Depending on the number of games in history it's almost certain to happen at some point. I removed all

such filters from my stuff years ago.

RL

Reply #1

SkyLine69 — Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:55:38 GMT

Sounds to me if you haven't already time to make a few program changes lol

RJ I've actually doesn't hours on a game filled out slips only yo find out I for hot t add the last draw numbers in lol or I'll forget to update the links to my pattern recognition program Errrr.

The pitfalls of using a system

RJOh — Sun, 13 Dec 2015 21:41:31 GMT

Yesterday I played 20 lines for Ohio's Classic Lotto. I checked my data file and made sure it was up to date with all the previous drawing results and that they were in order before picking any lines to play.

I calculated the parameters and limits that cover 95% of those drawings which I used in a RNG to create a profile for the lines it picks. The winning numbers were 4 6 19 23 36 37 and I matched two three times.

The winning numbers fitted the RNG profile perfectly which normally would... [ More ]