Seeking one more partner (Euromillion players), working method partner

Reply #17

bienporro — Fri, 15 Jan 2016 22:27:42 GMT

I'm not angry, I was just upset that he was making me waste my time if he doesn't even take a look at the image I posted, I even have a explanation on the side. I was talking potatoes and him rice when there is no rice mentioned anywhere and I have no problem answering questions but don't make me waste my time. It may not look like it but it is an effort of my time to come here and answer.

Yes I'm a super villain, scheming and angry. I even had the trouble of creating an account the same... [ More ]

Reply #16

GoogilyMoogily — Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:54:03 GMT

look who gets angry at the slightest inquiry or doubt

i will NEVER invest in your scheme and i hope nobody else does

you are angry scheming and hiding something

do you have an independent accounting or law firm

validate you have spent all the investment or do you keep a portion (for fees)? validate each share is accounted for, or would you claim to have half the shares if you should ever win anything?

if you have an office pool, there is typically face-to-face contact, and a li... [ More ]

Reply #15

bienporro — Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:36:20 GMT

What are you talking about? What premise? Why are you talking of sequences of 29-31. Those are not sequences, sequence is 1-2, 10-11, 29-30, 37-38 and so on. What in the image above tells you about sequences that differ by 3 or 2? Where does it mention anything related to that. You made me waste my time basically.

It does have effect, why such law happens I don't know, perhaps a butterfly used its wings to fly and influenced the dice.Dice has no memory but if the dice never comes on on 6... [ More ]

Reply #14

dddwww — Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:17:30 GMT

I'm not forgetting anything, I'm saying that sequences of numbers that differ by 1 (such a 26-27) are the most common of all sequences.

For example, they are more common than sequences that differ by 2 (such as 29-31) or sequences that differ by 3 (such as 17-20) ...

So your basic premise that such sequences are uncommon is faulty as well as irrelevant as all combinations of numbers are EQUALLY uncommon.

If you are into something else, such as trying to predict the next drawing's n... [ More ]

Reply #13

bienporro — Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:50:15 GMT

Wait! I get it, what your saying is that because with 3 sequences there is less keys possible the probability is bigger but your forgetting that they are smaller but not so smaller and in a year you would be betting for the opportunity of winning in only a couple of occasions. You cannot calculate by just comparing 1 to 1. You need to add more to the equation. And by adding the amount of opportunities to play, unless your certain you can win, you will be wasting a year of opportunities to win on... [ More ]

Reply #12

bienporro — Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:44:48 GMT

Yes that is what I'm saying, because keys with sequence of numbers and more specifically 2 and 3 and 4 sequences should be avoided.

You understand that in 300 draws 4 sequences never happened, 3 only happened once and 2 a couple of times. Your telling me that you would play a key with 4 sequences, THAT NEVER HAPPENED, because it has the same probability of coming out? How the hell does your math work?

You understand that basically I give you 1-2 1-3 1-4, you can win 1 million and I tell yo... [ More ]

Reply #11

dddwww — Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:20:38 GMT

You are still mistaken.

1-2-3-4-5 has exactly the same probability of being chosen as any other combination. Both in theory and in practice.

You have not presented a proof. You have shown some sequence with little explanation that appears to conclude that because sequential numbers are uncommon they should be avoided.

Sequential numbers are uncommon but more common than numbers separated by 2 which are more common than numbers separated by 3 ...

Let's take a simple exa... [ More ]

Reply #10

bienporro — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:25:42 GMT

In a pick drawing all sets of numbers are equally likely to occur but the image above tells you the sets of numbers with 0 or 1 are the most likely to occur, 0 the most common one and they have clear patterns. During the year of 2015 the sets of numbers with 2 sequences only happened 8 times and 3 sequences happened only once. This clearly tells you that you can scratch off thousands and thousands of sets of numbers.

So no, not every set of number has the same probability of coming out,... [ More ]

Reply #9

dddwww — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:05:58 GMT

Your thinking is faulty

While a sequence of n, n+1 is uncommon it happens to be MORE COMMON than any other single sequence such as n, n+2 or n, n+3 or n, n+4

What you are doing is saying n, n+1 is less common than ALL OTHER sequences combined. That isn't helpful as you can't compare the possibility of a single sequence (n, n+1) occurring with the possibility of ALL OTHER sequences occurring. You don't get to bet on ALL OTHER sequences for the same price as betting on ONE sequence... [ More ]

Reply #8

SergeM — Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:09:00 GMT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

Reply #7

SergeM — Mon, 04 Jan 2016 21:46:48 GMT

2015-12-29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Reply #6

SkyLine69 — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:39:52 GMT

No accusations here. Not my style without hard concrete evidence My main formulas are like this

a^ d*{1.618 / 2}+n/7.161873=?

As I mentioned above I do rather well

good luck on your conquest

Reply #5

bienporro — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:29:43 GMT

It was to make you laugh, I was laughing while writing it but nonetheless is true, I want someone with independent thinking, someone that will add something to the group and not just take the ride. I just gave you evidence that at least I know something the rest, you will have to take the jump. Sometimes there is just no other option. I'm not insulting your capacity, I'm saying you didn't take the time to study the image, I need someone that will put some thought into it. That is why you failed... [ More ]

Reply #4

SkyLine69 — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:47:04 GMT

Oh and if you would want to candidate, I'm sorry to say but your out because you couldn't interpret the image xd sorry

sorry, this part made me laugh. If I wanted to join your venture I would of sent you a PM Furthermore I do extreamly.ly well with what I use. I was only asking for an explanation for others more than myself because your very vague with no evidence what you have works . It sounds to me you read Richard Lustigs book and now want others to help you in buying a lot more lines Ju... [ More ]

Reply #3

bienporro — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:25:50 GMT

I will never explain my method, no reasonable person with a method to win would put it online. Your asking me to do this Yeahhhhhhhhh, I just spend X number of month's working on this and now will post it on the web so others can win instead of me .

Nevertheless, I don't mind explaining what is in the image. Basically if there is Millions of keys possible to play, by the law of random, where a last event will not influence a future event, every single one of those million of keys should have... [ More ]

Reply #2

SkyLine69 — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 20:06:59 GMT

Explain your method. This makes no sense besides maybe binary

Reply #1

bienporro — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:53:13 GMT

Here is the image

Seeking one more partner (Euromillion players), working method partner

bienporro — Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:30:21 GMT

So first things first, related to my last topic.(here is the link https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/295499 )

Let's just say, if your one of the poor individuals with reading incapability before posting something of what I said, please ignore me and move on. Now I will agree with some people, it is extremely difficult to find someone who would believe me or be interested. Well I knew,it was not going to be easy but it was a fail during the time I tried to get in contact with people(first I us... [ More ]