Pick 3> Odds 1/1000,1/67 , 1/33 is your filter for str8

Reply #63

bigdaddy — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:22:03 GMT

combine draws and keep track of what set is hitting.

Reply #62

bigdaddy — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:19:59 GMT

draw specific is day to day,mid to mid and eve to eve...Combined is all draws..

Reply #61

destinycreation — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:59:36 GMT

How do you mean by drawing specific ??? Do you mean Midday - Midday, and/or Evening - Evening ??

How do you figure out if the hidden pattern of your state's lottery game is actually trending Midday - Midday, Evening - Evening, or Midday - Evening/Evening - Midday

Reply #60

bigdaddy — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:43:59 GMT

The next draw is directly related to the last 10 numbers that came before them...some states is drawing specific,some states are combined drawing like TN with which the midday drawing is the dominant drawing most of the time.

Reply #59

MrsGH01 — Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:21:15 GMT

hi adobea can you please, please post texas

Thank you so very much

Reply #58

adobea78 — Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:31:05 GMT

IND 4663

Reply #57

adobea78 — Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:22:07 GMT

P4

GA 1113-1133-1143-1144-3311-3344-3341-1349-1340-1348

IL 0000-0003-0033-0044-3300-3344-0034-0036-3346-0346

IND 6677-7766-6667-6673-6674-6634-7733-7734-7763-6734

NB picks are highly suggested for DAY draws, but with 10 picks , a combined bet for few draws is still below the threshold of $2.5/5.0k.

Reply #56

MzDuffleBaglady — Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:12:03 GMT

Reply #55

adobea78 — Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:00:17 GMT

P4

NJ 8899-9988-8894-8896-9984-9986-8893-9983-8988-9998

NY 5599-5593-5533-9955-9933-5596-5597-9956-9957-3356

KY 3300-3309-3399-0033-0099-9900-3097-3096-3091-9931

MD 5551-5511-5500-1150-1100-1105-5104-5108-5514-5558

Reply #54

adobea78 — Tue, 09 Aug 2016 01:32:28 GMT

WI so far str 774,777

Reply #53

adobea78 — Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:51:51 GMT

WI 777

Reply #52

Wisconsin3054 — Mon, 01 Aug 2016 15:28:34 GMT

If you play one straight combo, there is 1 potential outcome in which you win, and 999 potential outcomes in which you lose. In odds lingo, the : symbol puts positive results on one side, negative results on the other side. Basically.

Reply #51

Sunglasses — Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:52:01 GMT

How do you find 1:999

Reply #50

adobea78 — Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:44:14 GMT

Sometimes a combo occurs more often than once every 1000 draws, sometimes less often. This phenomenon is just how probabilities work, when you are evaluating the probabilities of future truly random events.

I subscribe to the premise of the game, the issue is understanding ratios of a parameter. Lets say a State X has a game with regulation 10C6 (with digit replacement), the ratio 1/1000000 can be calculated in theory, how do you test this ratio? What's is your understanding of this ratio? Wh... [ More ]

Reply #49

Wisconsin3054 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 01:05:58 GMT

I got the ratio 1/1000 from the entire game concept of pick 3. The concept of the game is that each draw, each digit is randomly selected from digits 0-9. Perhaps you don't believe the concept of the game is accurate, either intentionally or unintentionally. If it is not accurate, then that would certainly change the game ratios. I obtained the 1/1000 ratio under the assumption that the stated concept of the game is accurate.

Sometimes a combo occurs more often than once every 1000 draws, som... [ More ]

Reply #48

Wisconsin3054 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:55:31 GMT

Sure, but if you would like people to understand what you are saying, you may want to consider using simpler, more precise language. Just a humble suggestion.

Reply #47

adobea78 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:53:38 GMT

I guess I don't understand why you are using words and language that just make this more difficult to understand what you are saying.

I did give a clue to the formation of current pool in most of my threads, a system forum is not limited to step by step method, is also putting ideal out for people to discern information.

Reply #46

adobea78 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:37:50 GMT

Where did you get the ratio 1/1000? Has this ratio been tested? . The ratio is assumption from the binomial format NCr. Sure, things can be calculate in theory, but the actual percentage occurrence of a combo may vary.-Why do you have frequent combos within 1 to 1000 threshold?, why do all the combos goes beyond or below the 1000 threshold

Reply #45

Wisconsin3054 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:18:31 GMT

I guess I don't understand why you are using words and language that just make this more difficult to understand what you are saying.

The assumption is every triad (combo) has a chance of coming within 1 to 1000 draws. This is true. A chance. These things can be calculated. An outcome (combo) with 1 in 1000 chance of occurring in a single event (draw), has approximately a 63% chance of occurring once or more in 1000 draws: 1-(.999^1000).

Reply #44

adobea78 — Sat, 30 Jul 2016 00:08:43 GMT

The ratio 1/1000 refers to discrete values, and is constant per each draw. Average of something refers to central tendency of a selected parameter. Now the parameter in question here is a 'triad'(discrete value) of statistical combinatorial of 10 digits where 3 is selected at a time. The assumption is every triad has chance of coming within 1 to 1000 draws--this is not always true, because 1/1000 is assumed prior ratio yet to be tested. The problem is, in analyzing a data, the prior ratio of par... [ More ]

Reply #43

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:42:38 GMT

I believe odds expression is 1:999, being 1 potential positive result against 999 potential negative results, with each result having the same chance of occurring.

You may not play every draw, but every draw you do play still has the same odds with one play, 1:999.

Reply #42

Sunglasses — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:31:46 GMT

You don't play each draw. 1:1000 is the average of something.

But, effectively, there is a way to win average with a fair payout, playing every time.

Reply #41

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:29:37 GMT

A degree in mathematical algorithms allows you to exclude 200 potential combos each draw

Reply #40

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:28:51 GMT

Maybe this stuff is just a little beyond my comprehension. I don't see where you are getting the numbers listed under current state

Reply #39

Sunglasses — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:23:47 GMT

I have a degree for mathematical algorithms.

Reply #38

adobea78 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 19:35:34 GMT

GA-4(Eve)

Draw Date Results

Thu, Jul 28, 2016 5-7-0-9Prize Payouts

Wed, Jul 27, 2016 3-9-2-1Prize Payouts

Tue, Jul 26, 2016 3-3-7-5Prize Payouts

Mon, Jul 25, 2016 1-2-8-6Prize Payouts

Sun, Jul 24, 2016 3-0-0-3Prize Payouts

Sat, Jul 23, 2016 1-1-0-3Prize Payouts

Fri, Jul 22, 2016 4-4-6-5Prize Payouts

Thu, Jul 21, 2016 7-1-6-6Prize Payouts

Wed, Jul 20, 2016 1-1-4-6Prize Payouts

Tue, Jul 19, 2016 3-1-9-1Prize Payouts

Mon, Jul 18, 2016 1-7-1... [ More ]

Reply #37

adobea78 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:56:48 GMT

Probability for any parameter is not ' edge in stone', before you flip a coin, the assumed ratio is 50/50. This ratio has not been tested, but is deemed a fact. The question is, does this ratio remains constant for 10, 20,30,40.....N flips? What's PRIOR ratio of say a tail before the next flip(note that assumed ratio is deemed to be constant for each unique flip)?. You can have two graphs of flips of similar distribution, but the ratios of H and T will change. P3 has assumed ratio(has not been t... [ More ]

Reply #36

lakerben — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:50:16 GMT

Good job 782 hit last night.

Reply #35

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:21:11 GMT

Are you able to explain how you get to the current pool above, and how you use that order of digits to establish your pick ratio

Reply #34

Wisconsin3054 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:20:14 GMT

How do you get to 1:800 or better

Reply #33

Sunglasses — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:25:08 GMT

Maybe someone of you wants to start calculating.

Reply #32

adobea78 — Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:27:42 GMT

Is all about ' The State of POOL'. The prior picks does not tell you much about 1/1000, knowing the state of current pool does. With a every draw, the assumption of prior pool is 0123456789, eg, say my current draw is 123, the state of my current pool will be 8057916423, this will establish my prior pick of the ratio 1/1000.

Reply #31

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:57:07 GMT

In simulations I have found that it sometimes takes more than 3x before every combo shows at least once.

For larger number games it's even greater. It's impossible to calculate a exact number of drawings it takes

before every possible combo shows at least once. So for a pick-3 a good estimate would be at least 3000

but could be much higher. With this in mind some lines will have a much greater hit rate than the expected

1 in 1000.

RL

Reply #30

Sunglasses — Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:19:53 GMT

Are you still with 1:1000? I am at 1:800 and better.

Reply #29

adobea78 — Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:48:29 GMT

NM Eve draws

{8,6,8} {8,6,3} {8,6,1} {8,6,7} {8,6,6} {8,6,2} {8,2,7} {8,2,6} {8,2,2} {{6,3,8} {6,1,8} {6,1,3} {6,1,1} {6,1,7} {6,1,6} {6,1,2} {6,2,2}

WI {7,9,9} {7,9,6} {7,9,4} {7,9,2} {7,9,5} {7,9,7} } {7,4,9} {7,4,6} {7,4,4} {7,4,2} {7,4,5} {7,4,7} {7,7,9} {7,7,6} {7,7,4} {7,7,2} {7,7,5} {7,7,7

Reply #28

adobea78 — Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:18:29 GMT

Yes, odds are 1/1000 for the 10 digits.

Reply #27

gopher07 — Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:54:32 GMT

odds are 1 /100 x10

Reply #26

adobea78 — Mon, 25 Jul 2016 03:36:15 GMT

Use these ratios as filters for time frame and str8 plays:

Pool Size Ratio Assumed time frame

10 1/1000 100

10 1/720 72

10 1/220 22

9 1/729 81

9 1/504 56

9 1/165 18

8 1/512 64

8 1/336 42

8 1/120 15

7 1/343 49

7 1/210 30

7 1/84 12

6 1/216 36

6 1/120 20

6 1/56 10

Inference The ratio is assumed prior probability of each Pool size, the assumption is each set(3 digits) will be out from 1 to statistical combo limit, eg 1/1000 means all picks will... [ More ]

Reply #25

Sunglasses — Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:30:33 GMT

Just consult my website.

Reply #24

adobea78 — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:52:00 GMT

ideal create a ratio for time frame

P4 eve draws

NJ

{7,9,1,0} {7,9,1,6} {7,9,1,5} {7,9,0,6} {7,9,0,5} {7,9,6,5} {7,1,0,6} {7,1,0,5} {7,1,6,5} {7,0,6,5} {9,1,0,6} {9,1,0,5} {9,1,6,5} {9,0,6,5} {1,0,6,5}{3,4,1,0} {3,4,1,9} {3,4,1,2} {3,4,0,9} {3,4,0,2} {3,4,9,2} {3,1,0,9} {3,1,0,2} {3,1,9,2} {3,0,9,2} {4,1,0,9} {4,1,0,2} {4,1,9,2} {4,0,9,2} {1,0,9,2}

OH

{5,9,2,1} {5,9,2,3} {5,9,2,6} {5,9,1,3} {5,9,1,6} {5,9,3,6} {5,2,1,3} {5,2,1,6} {5,2,3,6} {5,1,3,6} {9,2,1,3} {9,2,1,6} {9,2... [ More ]

Reply #23

adobea78 — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:29:27 GMT

Eve draws for str bets

OHIO

}{8,9,4} {8,9,5} {8,9,3} {8,9,1} {8,4,9} {8,4,5} {8,4,3} {8,4,1} {8,5,9} {8,5,4} {8,5,3} {8,5,1} {8,3,9} {8,3,4} {8,3,5} {8,3,1} {8,1,9} {8,1,4} {8,1,5} {8,1,3}

NJ

{0,7,6} {0,7,9} {0,7,4} {0,7,2} {0,6,7} {0,6,9} {0,6,4}{0,6,2} {0,9,7}{0,9,6}{0,9,4}{0,9,2}{0,4,7} {0,4,6} {0,4,9} {0,4,2} {0,2,7} {0,2,6} {0,2,9} {0,2,4

Reply #22

adobea78 — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:00:00 GMT

Predictions based on ratio 1/120 Eve draws time frame 12

ARK

{4,8,1} {4,8,5} {4,8,0} {4,8,7} {4,1,8} {4,1,5} {4,1,0} {4,1,7} {4,5,8} {4,5,1} {4,5,0} {4,5,7} {4,0,8} {4,0,1} {4,0,5} {4,0,7} {4,7,8} {4,7,1} {4,7,5} {4,7,0}

CAL

{9,1,5} {9,1,4} {9,1,0} {9,1,3} {9,5,1} {9,5,4} {9,5,0} {9,5,3} {9,4,1} {9,4,5} {9,4,0} {9,4,3} {9,0,1} {9,0,5} {9,0,4} {9,0,3} {9,3,1} {9,3,5} {9,3,4} {9,3,0

Reply #21

adobea78 — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:09:17 GMT

Let's consider the ratio 1/720(distinct),ie a pick will occur every 720 draws(in theory). This ratio becomes the range of my time frame for next prediction. With 10 leading digits,I will reduce the draws to 72 to locate my first pick.

Ark Eve draws creating the ratio 1/720 on 5/19/2016, we can filter 60 draws (5/19 to 7/19) and wage the remaining 12 draws (This is testing assumption, the hits may go beyond 72 draws or even less).

Draw 293

Initial 720 combo

Wed, Jun 8, 2016 9-7-8Priz... [ More ]

Reply #20

adobea78 — Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:22:53 GMT

FL Considering the assume ratio 1/120, I will create my first of 120 from FL 3(E), starting from date 3/19/2016. Filter lead digits hits from 3/20/2016 hits 934

{4,3,9} {4,3,5} {4,3,2} {4,3,8} {4,9,3} {4,9,5} {4,9,2} {4,9,8} {4,5,3} {4,5,9} {4,5,2} {4,5,8} {4,2,3} {4,2,9} {4,2,5} {4,2,8} {4,8,3} {4,8,9} {4,8,5} {4,8,2} {3,4,9} {3,4,5} {3,4,2} {3,4,8}{3,9,4} {3,9,5} {3,9,2} {3,9,8} {3,5,4} {3,5,9} {3,5,2} {3,5,8} {3,2,4} {3,2,9} {3,2,5} {3,2,8} {3,8,4} {3,8,9} {3,8,5} {3,8,2} {9,4,3} {9,4,5

Reply #19

Stack47 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 05:04:32 GMT

I doubt you'll ever see 1000 drawings in any state pick-3 game where each of the ten digits in the first digit position were each drawn exactly 100 times. You might find a few examples when all ten digits in a digit position were all drawn in 10 drawings, but finding it in two digit positions is very rare. I found one example when all ten digits were drawn in each digit position in ten drawings in the Ohio Lottery results testing a most out digits system.

Flip a coin (heads is even) three tim... [ More ]

Reply #18

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 04:28:28 GMT

Lets create our own 1/216 chance starting from 3/19(4,3,9,5,2,8

{4,4,4} {4,4,3} {4,4,9} {4,4,5} {4,4,2} {4,4,8} {4,3,4} {4,3,3} {4,3,9} {4,3,5} {4,3,2} {4,3,8} {4,9,4} {4,9,3} {4,9,9} {4,9,5} {4,9,2} {4,9,8} {4,5,4} {4,5,3} {4,5,9} {4,5,5} {4,5,2} {4,5,8} {4,2,4} {4,2,3} {4,2,9} {4,2,5} {4,2,2} {4,2,8} {4,8,4} {4,8,3} {4,8,9} {4,8,5} {4,8,2} {4,8,8} {3,4,4} {3,4,3} {3,4,9} {3,4,5} {3,4,2} {3,4,8} {3,3,4} {3,3,3} {3,3,9} {3,3,5} {3,3,2} {3,3,8} {3,9,4} {3,9,3} {3,9,9} {3,9,5} {3,9,2} {3,9,8

Reply #17

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 03:51:48 GMT

Considering the assume ratio 1/120, I will create my first of 120 from FL 3(E), starting from date 3/19/2016.

Wed, Apr 27, 2016 2-8-7Prize Payouts

Tue, Apr 26, 2016 0-4-9Prize Payouts

Mon, Apr 25, 2016 2-9-7Prize Payouts

Sun, Apr 24, 2016 9-0-9Prize Payouts

Sat, Apr 23, 2016 2-1-5Prize Payouts

Fri, Apr 22, 2016 1-2-0Prize Payouts

Thu, Apr 21, 2016 3-9-4Prize Payouts

Wed, Apr 20, 2016 5-7-9Prize Payouts

Tue, Apr 19, 2016 8-8-4Prize Payouts

Mon, Apr... [ More ]

Reply #16

amber123 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 03:42:27 GMT

The law of averages never did and never will portion the stats out in a neat compartmental file over time, with equal amounts in each file.

For example, If In Florida every year, an average of 60 birds flew into a wall, it doesn't mean that there were specifically 5 birds a month flying into a wall. The following scenario is highly unlikely, but to make my point, you can have no birds fly into a wall for 8 months in a row, but 60 birds flew into a wall in the remaining 4 months. The average i... [ More ]

Reply #15

amber123 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 03:32:44 GMT

Because one draw, doesn't have anything to do with any other draw at any other time before.

The chance remains as 1/1000 ALL of the time.

That is how Statistical Chance works, always has.

I disagree strongly. Take for example just one number, let's say in the last position in the p-3. The last winning number in the last position was say.....3. Although it's very possible another 3 can show in the last position again, I would NOT bet on it. This is just one example, but If you take... [ More ]

Reply #14

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 03:00:12 GMT

Also, you know that when you filter out filter-patterns you are also filtering out numbers, in this particular case straight pick 3 numbers.

So you are not restricted to just filtering out the straight pick 3 numbers DIRECTLY.

You do need to filter out patterns such as digits, pairs, Even-Odd, Low-High, Sums, Widths, Etc.

Reply #13

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:58:24 GMT

Thanks, dr san.

Reply #12

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:55:40 GMT

While you can filter OUT many previous draws, the stats would show, that a given part of the time, it is only more or less safe to filter out a given number of past draws and that will or could change in time, you would filter out so many draws and you would fail some portion of the time and you would win a portion of the time also, but the problem here is that there are 1000 straight numbers and they only pay $500 for a winning straight number.

So that on or by itself is not enough.

Reply #11

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:48:10 GMT

It all comes down to physics.

For every action there is a re-action maybe of equal value, but of opposite force (?) and there are a multitude of actions that produce the reactions that make the winning lottery number(s).

Maybe even the most astute and learned person could not exactly explain what and how it happens, but it does produce what we see on the past history of the winning numbers.

All that I can say is: Study the past winning numbers, cause they and the make-up the physical ma... [ More ]

Reply #10

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:42:48 GMT

Because one draw, doesn't have anything to do with any other draw at any other time before.

Very True. The ideal is to run my own draws creating my FIRST PICK out of N(N could be 1000,220,720 ,,,). I may need a software to filter many previous draws.

Reply #9

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:35:36 GMT

In a mechanical drawing the reason is all physical (mechanical) so to speak.

There are a multitude of factors involved in the selection of the 3 balls, they are all mechanical-physical reasons, Sir Isaac Newton and or Albert Einstein maybe could explain better, cause I sure can't.

On RNG based drawings there are also reasons, reasons having to do with the production of numbers by the use of RNGs, either way, it all comes to having the same or almost the same results, there will always be s... [ More ]

Reply #8

dr san — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:19:02 GMT

Hello AdobeÂ 78, you can do the cycle of the 3 positions of pick3

From 0 to 9 each digit then join to create betting

The probability that a random drawing shows the positions

Following the Gauss curve, central range of probalidades

No matter 1/1000 or 1/10 (0-9) position by position

A closed loop is when at least one digit is drawn

The law does not apply in Belford lotteries because of this

Reply #7

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:17:55 GMT

How do one adjust or account for odds of the frequent ones?

That is what some people would like to know about.

There is no other way than to study the past draws, their patterns and their stats, of course you need to know how to study them, what you are looking for and how to interpret what you see-find.

Reply #6

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:17:11 GMT

All 1000 straight numbers are equal, that is the same, there is no reason why some of them should come more often than others. But it is possible that for some reason some might come out more often than others.

There should be a reason, case in point, in a coin flip, the assumed ratio is 50H/50T, but after n flips the ratio changes(may have more H than T).

Reply #5

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:13:27 GMT

It doesn't take 1000 drawing for each of the 1000 straight numbers to come out.

Why not?

Because one draw, doesn't have anything to do with any other draw at any other time before.

The chance remains as 1/1000 ALL of the time.

That is how Statistical Chance works, always has.

Reply #4

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:03:42 GMT

Sure , for any draw cycle, the assumed chance remains constant, but some draws does not come out, and some come out more than once, how do one adjust or account for odds of the frequent ones?

It doesn't take 1000 drawing for each of the 1000 straight numbers to come out.

Why not

Reply #3

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 01:52:25 GMT

As to filters, well, it is in a way the same as the straight pick 3 numbers themselves.

Both the straight pick 3 numbers and the filters are just patterns .

On a given section of draws, some patterns don't come out at all, some come out once and some come out more than once.

It is the same as with the digits and with the full numbers, such is life.

Why? Who knows, but that is the way that it is.

The past draws and their stats don't lie.

Fernando.

Reply #2

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 01:46:38 GMT

All 1000 straight numbers are equal, that is the same, there is no reason why some of them should come more often than others.

But it is possible that for some reason some might come out more often than others.

The odds should always be the same on each and every draw, that is 1/1000 regardless of what came before, but in real life it might not be like that.

The past draws don't lie, that is the only truth out there, lottery and prediction - wise.

Reply #1

MonEl — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 01:40:53 GMT

It doesn't take 1000 drawing for each of the 1000 straight numbers to come out.

On 1000 draws some numbers don't come out.

Some come out one time (once).

And some come out more than once.

I don't have the real stats and probably can't get them either.

But it should be as I posted.

Pick 3> Odds 1/1000,1/67 , 1/33 is your filter for str8

adobea78 — Sun, 17 Jul 2016 01:15:38 GMT

Ideal Total combo for P3 is 1000picks, hence the ratio is 1/1000. How do you interpret this from filter perspective? Is the ratio 1/1000 constant for each draw cycle with respect to what data size? Does the ratio 1/1000 assumes each pick will be drawn within 0 to 999 cycles? Can one assume, filtering previous 999 picks can get your next str hit? That's this sound logical?.

Consider a scenario where you know the start date of pick 3 draws of a State X, if current total draws is 999,can you wit... [ More ]