Lottery Post Systems and Winning

Reply #40

a562soldier — Sat, 09 Dec 2017 23:50:09 GMT

Ricklou is absolutely correct. The games and payouts are completely controlled and managed by the lotteries carefully to make sure profits for them occur foremost.

They have systems in place that allow them to easily see what numbers have been purchased in advance, so they can weigh and analyze the amount of tickets placed on certain numbers versus others that will have lesser payouts. The obvious choice immediately becomes clear, officials all come to terms and agree on the winning number an... [ More ]

Reply #39

thamizhpayan — Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:43:04 GMT

If you look at the probability of picking singles(no match), doubles and triples, then you can see why triples are pulled rare...

If you take all draws for a state you can see that month would have had 2 or 3 triples, a year would have had 2 to 5 triples and some without any triples.

It doesn't mean that it's manipulated. That's how random works.

If you eliminate all lower odds of occurrences you will have huge set left out which you jave to reduce. Same way if you e... [ More ]

Reply #38

Ricklou — Fri, 01 Dec 2017 18:23:40 GMT

They will rarely play triples WHY ???? Because triples are the most played and that will mean a big payout meaning less profit....its not playing the most due number BUT rather the least played combination that suits there patern. Its almost as controversial as people believing that the lottery are completely random....those people must wake up and smell the coffee its the year 2017.Any lottery pick 3 pick 4 pick 5 or pick 6 are FULLY controlled.

Reply #37

Stack47 — Mon, 27 Nov 2017 04:20:48 GMT

I don't care if you systems work or not, but I do take offence when you say purschasing a Premimum Membership ever year for ten years is not contributed anything in this lotto site period.

Apologies to JKING for using his thread to have a childish agreement.

Reply #36

Stack47 — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 19:56:04 GMT

You have not contributed anything in this lotto site period.

If purchasing a Premium Membership every year for probably over 10 years isn't contributing to LP, I don't know what is. Are you saying your systems are better than LP's systems

Reply #35

lakerben — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 06:29:43 GMT

My systems are free and no one is obligated to use any of them,but many have and continue to pm almost daily thanking me. This is great . Its positive and shows this site helps people. I use other people systems,charts etc and it's a positive and that's the way it is.

Reply #34

lakerben — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 06:23:23 GMT

Show me your systems. I'm very interested. I'm waiting and so are many members .

Reply #33

lakerben — Sun, 26 Nov 2017 06:18:00 GMT

You have not contributed anything in this lotto site period.

The knockout system is more than what you posted.

653 sum 14

Root 5

55 55 55

6 5 3

49 50 52

Add

61 60 58

I use these pairs. The next draw was 489.

I guess I can do more than highlight. Mensa. Thanks but all the systems work together in more than one way. One thing for sure is that some members contribute to this site and others with no skill can't and won't help anyone.

The 300k views are a result... [ More ]

Reply #32

Stack47 — Mon, 06 Nov 2017 05:39:27 GMT

Don't pay any attention to them; they are just mad because you and a couple others gave their threads one star. Besides just the fact their systems are using the RNG drawn New Mexico pick-3 numbers, pretty much proves their loyalty to LP.

Reply #31

Stack47 — Mon, 06 Nov 2017 05:35:29 GMT

I have not seen a single lottery idea from you!

I shared lots of ideas long before you joined LP, but unlike you I never tried selling them like a snake oil salesmen.

I guess you are only good at highlighting!

Why does the fact for clarity I highlight the portion of a post I'm specifically addressing annoy you so much?

I have posted years and years worth of winners on my systems

By posting 220 pick-3 combos. Where can someone find your picks and hits ratio?

Are you system... [ More ]

Reply #30

Stack47 — Mon, 06 Nov 2017 05:03:22 GMT

As a fellow highlight master , I agree with most of your assessments. And also agree the real value of LP is in the data gathering tools.

It would be a better forum if we all strived to contribute in positive and informative ways.

I'm probably much more critical than most of some of the redundant stuff we read, but I've back off some on saying what I believe needs to be said. It's none of my business if some members actually expect to win a major jackpot making it useless explaining tha... [ More ]

Reply #29

JKING — Fri, 03 Nov 2017 06:54:26 GMT

Hi,

Just a reminder....

*****Rules for using Lottery Post

No trolling.Don't make posts that are inflammatory just to annoy people and start conflict.

No personal attacks.Criticize ideas, not people.Â Flaming will not be tolerated.Â This includes any material which is vulgar, defamatory, inaccurate, harassing, hateful, threatening, invading of others' privacy, sexually-oriented, or violates any laws.

lakerben

The wording value implies you have no respect for what todd has... [ More ]

Reply #28

lakerben — Thu, 02 Nov 2017 16:06:17 GMT

This is from the highlight master who is the lead critic of LP. I have not seen a single lottery idea from you! Hmm , I guess you are only good at highlighting!

I have posted years and years worth of winners on my systems. My knockout system has well over 300k views. Jealousy doesn't look good on you. Highlight some more i am impressed

Reply #27

Stack47 — Thu, 02 Nov 2017 04:22:41 GMT

Which part of the topic is asking for opinions about the value of the Lottery Post is causing you so much confusion?

Your pompous negative rantings have no value for this site. Your pompous negative rantings have no value for this site.

If you value this site so highly, why don't have Premium membership if nothing more than to support it?

Your ratings won't sway anyone because I have helped many members.

Just the other day another member said your predictions statistics are legen... [ More ]

Reply #26

lakerben — Thu, 02 Nov 2017 01:51:47 GMT

I have yet to see anything of positive value from you not a single system but you start a thead with negativity.

Man up and contribute. You got a one star and it would have been zero if there was an option. Your pompous negative rantings have no value for this site. Your ratings won't sway anyone because I have helped many members. Think about it.

Reply #25

JKING — Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:25:36 GMT

Hi,

The have no respect is uncalled for. The whole sentence is divisive and in no respect reflects on Todd or the site. Sorry, the whole thing is your own creation with no negative intent on my part.

Like the last one star rating you gave me, you are entitled to your opinion. I have my own opinions, sorry they don't agree with yours.

Best of luck. *S

Reply #24

lakerben — Wed, 01 Nov 2017 16:39:22 GMT

The wording value implies you have no respect for what todd has done with this site. He has spent alot of time and effort to continually improve this site.

I find it hilarious that you went to my systems and rated them a one star. I'm trying to help people and you can't understand that with your attitude.

Reply #23

Soledad — Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:55:36 GMT

It's more like habits, we are creatures of habit for the most part. I wouldn't compare it to drug addiction. A little negative and harsh. But yeah others have agreed not much these days, people used to talk about tomorrow more than yesterdy etc. But keep having fun RL, it's better than treating this game as if it's work. Seriously. Random is as random does. Random is not completely understood. How can you control random. Random controls itself. The systems that are here, people don't stay stuck... [ More ]

Reply #22

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 29 Oct 2017 06:22:31 GMT

JKING

One last point, this is a public forum. Open to lottery officials and analysts to see if they need to make changes to their programs or lottery ball selection techniques.

Can we lead them to make the changes we want them to make? Get them to make changes that could benefit us in

other ways. I agree they use LP to help stay ahead of the curve and find possible weaknesses but have not seen much

in the last few years so I think they have reason to feel secure. I also think once

Reply #21

AllenB — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:50:20 GMT

About this House Always Wins. It is because the Take most of what you should win. In a Pick 3 Game They Pay you 50 cents on the dollar. The Odds against you are 1000:1, You get Paid $500.00. States with a Fixed Payout Limit the Times that a Combination Can be played to prevent large Losses. In the Peoples Republic of California they do Not Freeze out Combinations. They Divide a fixed amount from a formula that we do not ever see and then divide it among the Players. You could get back less than

Reply #20

Jayhawk58 — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:22:44 GMT

As a long time member I wanted to add some thoughts.

One can learn a lot about the lottery, games, etc on LP. Great resource.

Single most important reason I joined. The resources, past information shared, and just plain knowledge I've gained over the years of reading and researching is worth it alone. The tools I use with my platinum membership have paid for it many times over.

If there was much greater civility, courtesy, and a common respect for others I would post more at the LP.... [ More ]

Reply #19

Stack47 — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:01:57 GMT

If there was much greater civility, courtesy, and a common respect for others I would post more at the LP.

That pretty much defines the U.S. in general for about the last 25 years because political opinions are so opposite. Don't know how that creates heated lottery related debates, but it certainly does. Was it really necessary for someone to call your survey stupid on the second post?

As far as the survey, I wanted to see the opinion stats to see if others had come to the same conclusi... [ More ]

Reply #18

Soledad — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:54:15 GMT

It's the basis of the game itself it has nothing to do with rigging. Lottery officals or the states lose money by losing players, not paying out money, which is why they spend so much on advertising campaigns and new games. To try to attract players.

Ok but yes triples last year for NY were not as good as expected. They took a while they skipped a lot of months, so perhaps next year MD will see a lot more. And the percentages for triples to begin with are very low. So, based on the odds.... [ More ]

Reply #17

grwurston — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:08:55 GMT

Lottery's do in fact have a maximum amount they can pay out in a day. In Md it is 7 million. When enough people play a number that the payout will be 7 mill they stop selling that number. Now just because a number gets sold out, doesn't mean it will hit. Do you think the state wants to pay out 7 million? Especially if the state is having budget problems? I say state, because the lottery's are a state run agency.

Lottery's finance a lot of a states business or projects, not just education. It... [ More ]

Reply #16

Ron5995 — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:07:13 GMT

I highly doubt lotteries are scouting us here at LP. Not to say lottery officials don't ever visit (they certainly do; was in a LP chat with one a couple of years back), but likely just in passing verses collecting any meaningful research data. If lotteries were truly acting on what was posted on LP, there would be a lot more changes than there are...

Heck, there was a marketing research person seeking out people to take surveys, supposedly on behalf of the Ohio and New Mexico Lotteries, a fe... [ More ]

Reply #15

Soledad — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 02:33:35 GMT

All that false information can be disproven because really why would they it's not hard to get a winning number its hard to get when look at the payouts you get vs the amount tht you spend they get it back no matter what for the most part the odds are against you but not to do with the way you said. Based on odds already set. Why would they need to . It's already done like we say. They're not amateurs. Like I said everybody looks at it like quick easy money simple no thought. But not quite you k... [ More ]

Reply #14

Soledad — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 02:17:40 GMT

Ok I'll listen but thats like what I said and that has nothing to do with what I said you assuming to understand motives the state always pays max out on triples because peiple play them everyday and they get sold out. Your using what i said everybody thinks diff. Everyone plays different like everybody plays the same number when they dont so that 'theory' can not be proven and is just speculation. In other words a distraction. Who cares if they r in it to win it then who cares let them they got... [ More ]

Reply #13

grwurston — Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:20:33 GMT

Oh yeah, the officials are definitely here. It's been proven. They don't post much though, they

mostly just sit back, watch and listen. They're in it to make money, just like we are. We've

got some pretty smart people here. If every one here is talking about triples being due, do

you really think they are going to let them fall and pay out boat loads of money?

Have you ever tried to play a number at the store and been told, it's sold out? Why do they

do that? So they don't break... [ More ]

Reply #12

Soledad — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:28:12 GMT

More to the point, like two thoughts getting mixed is really what I'm talking about. It's the Nature of the Game. Not anything else. That's all. Like I've become pretty good but you know things move fast And each direction does have to start anew. So i guess I'm at that point or whatever. A little weird in thinking in terms of. Ok anyways thanks fo letting me talk .

Reply #11

Soledad — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:15:01 GMT

It is human nature to put meaning to what we see. Just because we don't see it before with predicting numbers doesn't mean we don't know. 'The nature of the game' We all analyze what we see everyday. To bring paranoia or anything negative like that just adds in my opinion an unclear path in thinking. So what's the point of it if you really want to call yourself a winner based on your own methods or methods of thinking or analysis. So yeah survey I understand what your thinking is etc fine sorry,... [ More ]

Reply #10

Soledad — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:56:02 GMT

Yo it doesn't matter that this is public. Those numbers are not set in stone. Analysis if you're talking about in terms of chances or probabilities or randomness are not set in stone although it is by nature common for us to think so. How pray tell would you think they would change their ball selection according to the discussions here? If you really believe that. They already randomly select which group that they use. They conduct pretesting. There is no interference involved whatso ever but ye... [ More ]

Reply #9

MsDiamond600 — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:42:53 GMT

Wow JKING I said the exact same thing to myself two weeks ago about this being public and with lottery officials. When it was so much talk about triples coming in for mostly all states the other weekend. Well CT didn't make the cut. Instead they threw us with trips in the quad the following week and have been doing that ever since. Last trip in play four was on 3/11/17. This have been going for the last month with them in regards to many numbers. They throw that curve ball in it. I know if I was... [ More ]

Reply #8

Soledad — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:04:54 GMT

I have to agree with you there is not much civility or positivity for that matter. But seriously no question I have. Not even a doubt. Problem is as other well known posters talk about is the profits. The betting side of it needs to be discussed because yeah you may win but how much does it cost to win? It needs to be thought about and remembered. Timing etc. Problem also is with lottery everyone looks at it like quick easy free money. Mistakes happen. But in order to really get down to it, you

Reply #7

JKING — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 03:19:27 GMT

Hi,

If there was much greater civility, courtesy, and a common respect for others I would post more at the LP. The constructive atmosphere that used to be LP has long since disappeared. Todd has opted not to control it. So, I occasionally check in to see if there are any really original approaches to the lottery puzzle.

As far as the survey, I wanted to see the opinion stats to see if others had come to the same conclusion as I (maybe something will pop up at the LP that might help). Bew... [ More ]

Reply #6

Soledad — Tue, 17 Oct 2017 01:41:24 GMT

Yo I've already proved that. I don't know why people don't listen. I mean yeah I guess but you should be talkin about how you think about when you bet. Otherwise the conversation really goes nowhere. So what's the point. How about where you playing? You can't just say one for all and be done with it. I don't think so. Let's get some action LP the legends are disappearing. What's left, Surveys? Come on

Reply #5

MzDuffleBaglady — Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:09:24 GMT

Reply #4

Ron5995 — Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:21:33 GMT

LP is winning from the traffic. Everyone else here, probably not.

One can learn a lot about the lottery, games, etc on LP. Great resource. However, in regards to winning, it comes down to statistics. Many hope to find a way to beat the odds. They won't barring some game glitch (ie. knowledge of a RNG flaw) or insider information (ie. location of top prize winners in instant packs).

Even if one finds a system , the typical 40%-50% lottery house advantage for numbers games is a huge mountain... [ More ]

Reply #3

Todd — Sun, 15 Oct 2017 12:32:08 GMT

Reply #2

JKING — Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:08:38 GMT

I never said that the LP wasn't a great site, regardless of any antagonistic remarks that may be made.

Reply #1

lakerben — Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:17:05 GMT

It's a great site regardless of this stupid survey. LP is the best on the net bar none.

Lottery Post Systems and Winning

JKING — Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:57:28 GMT

Hi,

I am just curios about what you think about the value of the Lottery Post.