A suggestion for All

Reply #13

EXCALIBUR — Tue, 09 Dec 2003 07:40:02 GMT

LottoKing, I meditate and study some of the things that people post here that I can understand, some things I can't, I lack knowledge of mathematics and programming, mostly, I observe, try to see and meditate and SEE a few things, observation, meditation and reflection are great tools for learning and getting some answers and seeing things. But right now I am finally (Begining to) using and testing some of the lottery programs that I have, I think That many people don't do good with them, bec... [ More ]

Reply #12

lottoking — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 03:40:02 GMT

Hi Excalibur,I am sweet as dandy.Thank you.......I have been trying to get a possible winning number..but failed last week...But I think I still will predict anwyay.And how is it going for you,man?Is everything cool with you?How is your studies on lotteries?Have you made any progress?lottoking

Reply #11

EXCALIBUR — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 03:08:01 GMT

Hi LottoKIng, how are You

Reply #10

EXCALIBUR — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 03:05:20 GMT

Hi Underdog, no it wasn't, I just bought LottoSyncronizer about 2 days ago and have not used it at all yet, but might in a day or two.It was the lower capacity demo of a general purpose numeric predicting program, because, it is a demo, it is restricted to only 1% of its predicting capacity, but fairly more or less good enough for giving rough predictions of the most likely numbers to come out for a single column of numbers, like if you enter about 100 numbers or any other such ammount, of 0 to... [ More ]

Reply #9

lottoking — Mon, 08 Dec 2003 02:57:45 GMT

I will try to post to make a better result anyway.I wont rest until I SUCCEED IN MAKING A WINNER HERE.LOTTOKING

Reply #8

underdog — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:53:22 GMT

was the program lottosynchronizer that you applied this reverse to???? if so please private message me and tell me exactly what you did and i will try a back test with it

Reply #7

lottoarchitect — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:31:48 GMT

It is weird indeed. It shouldn't work for one simple reason: all these programs are based in the assumption that numbers imported in the order they drawn. If I understood what you did, the last number of you file is the first draw of a lottery game and this should be constant for any future predictions. Thus they analyse averytime the same data. It doesn't make sense. Keep testing to see if it really works.

Reply #6

EXCALIBUR — Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:22:45 GMT

The following is going to sound weird or crazy, but trying to find logic on the lottery sequence of numbers and finding little, maybe 25% and think that the leftover missing logic, is not what many people call chaos or random, but a form of what might be called reverse logic, using two programs, which I won't name, I put the numbers in reverse by mistake and the programs using their regular programmed predicting logic came out with much better predictions, than when the drawed numbers were put i... [ More ]

Reply #5

Irvin — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:46:46 GMT

Lottoking,You shou

Reply #4

RJOh — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 16:43:11 GMT

If lottoking is still posting, he is not ousted. If lottoking doesn't post again, it is his choice. As for magic, I never saw any. Posting losing numbers doesn't make you a fraud but a dreamer like the rest of us who are trying to predict the winning numbers and win some money.RJOh

Reply #3

ants — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 14:24:06 GMT

I'm sorry you got ousted lotto

Reply #2

lottoking — Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:51:41 GMT

dynodyno If I could still come in and reply,i will answer your questiona winning number is not hard to get.there are risks everywhere to get it lost anyway,as i showed you at other posts,you should have known how a winning number be counted by formulas and preclue reminders.the risks is unavoidable,but you will deserve a winning number if you try.i am afraid i cant post here any more,someone has asked me to f**k offso thats it take care my friendlottoking

Reply #1

hypersoniq — Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:58:23 GMT

Quote: O

A suggestion for All

dynodyno — Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:51:14 GMT

This applies to everyone including LottoKing. I figure that rather than posting predictions(although that is OK), maybe we should all concentrate on figuring out how we arrive at the numbers we do. In fairness to LottoKing, he did post a method to decipher the numbers by way of remaining numbers. I would like to here more about this. For example how do you a apply it to a future draw? I think we all have to understand that the lottery is a big riddle. You need strategy, common sense, observ... [ More ]