<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Please give me your opinion on future predictions feature...</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/81194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Please give me your opinion on future predictions feature...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #19</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/189246</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/189246</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,Question;When you tally predictions for the predictor will the tally be on a thirty day basis or will you have a continuous tally up to 12 months.Also will you be including the payout on pairs bets also.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAP69</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #18</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/182951</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/182951</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>goose</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I suggest we use the actual prize and mark the prize score around the avatar so that everyone will see how good prediction he/she has made.Also I wonder when the prediction check could be finished.Thats about the time I am about to post something.goose</p>]]></description>
			<category>goose</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #17</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/178340</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/178340</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:22:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Millennium</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd: Can you make it so that if I select NY for Predictions that I can choose NY Only or NY *and* All States? I&#x27;d like to filter out All States.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Millennium</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #16</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176563</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176563</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 02:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>goose</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Teufellj on February 15, 2004 Hello Todd, a win is a win, that&#x27;s how I see this situation and include the ratio&#x27;s! If you go state by state exact tally&#x27;s then somewhere down the line, the already in progress program of state by state predictions will be eliminated because you will have two programs on the same site doing the same predictions and...you may lose the players that want to be a part of this great website yet do not wish to predict and post their names!Teuf... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176563">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>goose</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #15</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176265</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176265</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Teufellj,I don&#x27;t quite understand your point.  It sounds like you don&#x27;t want actual prizes, but I&#x27;m not exactly sure why.  If you just want to leave it alone then that&#x27;s fine, but I would love to understand your point.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #14</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176251</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176251</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Teufellj</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Todd, a win is a win, that&#x27;s how I see this situation and include the ratio&#x27;s! If you go state by state exact tally&#x27;s then somewhere down the line, the already in progress program of state by state predictions will be eliminated because you will have two programs on the same site doing the same predictions and...you may lose the players that want to be a part of this great website yet do not wish to predict and post their names!Teufellj</p>]]></description>
			<category>Teufellj</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176147</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176147</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kbcherokee</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd:It probably wouldn&#x27;t happen very often, but I would like to see where we could predict up to 50-combinations. This probably would only happen when a  Jackpot  reaches in excess of $50 to $80M like it is now. People tend to purchase more ticket&#x27;s then. Most of the time, a good majority of us only post 10 to 20 combo&#x27;s.Can you set it up this way?Chief</p>]]></description>
			<category>kbcherokee</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176007</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/176007</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Less complicated standard may be easier for you. Actual amount would be great but could it be done and updated quickly?$40 or $80 boxed and $500 straight are good enough for recording hits.Amt 12 to 24 picks per game is ok with me. I like larger amounts no one has to buy them we just post them.ThanksLee</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lee</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174420</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174420</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>kbcherokee</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd:All I play is the MM and PB, so I would say for these, use the actual amount  won. Chief</p>]]></description>
			<category>kbcherokee</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174353</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174353</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My state&#x27;s payouts don&#x27;t change, so an equal prize amount is fine with me, but if you don&#x27;t mind the extra work it would be more accurate.I do think Massachusetts should be treated as if having two pick 3 draws and a single pick 4 per day for scoring as that&#x27;s how it&#x27;s played. The front 3 of the pick-4 number could be the midday draw and the rear 3 of the pick-4 would be the night draw, and the pick-4 would be just that. Prediction was important at Maybell, but eating up John&#x27;s time toward the e... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174353">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174342</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174342</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No, it doesn&#x27;t do away with  all states .  When you select all states, it actually places predictions into each of the states individually.  The matching of actual results to predictions is totally independent.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174341</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174341</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>will this effectively do away with the  all states  blanket predictions? Personally, I think it would be more accurate if the exact game has to be specified beforehand.This is a great addition! keep up the great work.</p>]]></description>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174335</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174335</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by winsumloosesum on February 08, 2004 Todd,Will you include a prediction for Front and Back Pairs.  I realize not every state plays pairs.  Is there any chance of adding it but to be fair not include it in the overall performance of predicitons?Thanks,wslsPossibly; not sure yet.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174289</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174289</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 02:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>winsumloosesum</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,Will you include a prediction for Front and Back Pairs.  I realize not every state plays pairs.  Is there any chance of adding it but to be fair not include it in the overall performance of predicitons?Thanks,wsls</p>]]></description>
			<category>winsumloosesum</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174286</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174286</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 02:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>winsumloosesum</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,If 10 picks is the maximum magic number why not have everyone who posts predictions use all 10.Everyone would use the same percentages.wsls</p>]]></description>
			<category>winsumloosesum</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174280</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174280</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>IMT,Yes, one of the stats that we&#x27;ll keep track of is the play/win ratio, so if you win with fewer picks, then you will have a higher ratio.  That ratio, along with the dollars spent/won ratio is pretty much the Holy Grail of lottery predicting.  (Which is one of the main reasons for this poll.)Thanks for the kind words</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174271</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174271</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>I M Trying</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,Just asking,....but wouldn&#x27;t a win by someone posting 3 lines be worth more than a win by someone posting 12 lines??  The 3 line poster would have a much better percentage.  Anyway, thanks for all your hard work.  We appreciate you!IMT</p>]]></description>
			<category>I M Trying</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174265</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174265</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>goose</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I support the second way.goose</p>]]></description>
			<category>goose</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174262</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194/174262</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,I think an equal prize amount would do fine. Would be fair to those who post pari-mutel states. A hit is a hit.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAP69</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Please give me your opinion on future predictions feature...</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This question is so the membership can let me know their opinion about  keeping score  of predictions that win.  Specifically, I need to figure out how to show how much a win would have produced.My initial thought is that we should use a  universal  amount for a win.  That&#x27;s the way Maybell&#x27;s used to do it.  For example, if someone predicted a Pick 3 number that hit straight, they would be credited with a $500 win, no matter what state the prediction was for.The other way of doing it would be to... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/81194">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

