LottoSync Users - Tried This NEW Idea?!

Reply #9

QWEST46 — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:45:40 GMT

Thankx Dreamlotto and Bobp.

Reply #8

BobP — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:19:01 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by QWEST46 on April 26, 2004Hi bobp. I've read a lot of your post. You seem to be an expert when it comes to the lottery and so i just wanted to get your opinion (as well as others who would like to share) on the program windows lotto pro 2004 . Have u ever tried it? If so, where does it stand compared to all the other programs? I'm basically looking for a program that eliminates digits for pick 3/4, rather than predicting numbers. Lotto Pro seemed to work more times th... [ More ]

Reply #7

DreamLotto — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 05:41:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on April 25, 2004you can only input 3 draws, not moreYes, I know. What I meant here was, take FOUR fresh draws, make them into FOUR sets of THREE draws each. Next have each set tested by a different person (LottoSync user) at a mutually agreed sampling rate and time frame. Next have ALL of them post their results on this forum for further observation/discussion/innovation. Because we will have four daughter sets together from the SAME parent sets, not only we can... [ More ]

Reply #6

DreamLotto — Tue, 27 Apr 2004 05:13:44 GMT

Dear QWEST,I too am experimenting with Lotto Pro for our pick-3 games. In my observation, the best this program could go was 2/3 numbers and RARELY 3/3 numbers, but on a VERY CONSISTENT basis. Here is how I experimented:Under Options menu, I have given a setting of 30 for Drawing Cutoff and a setting of 10 for Hot Number Cutoff.Next I prepare the tickets using the SMART TICKETS option and choosing 5 numbers (if you choose more numbers, you will STILL NEVER get the third one, until you choose A... [ More ]

Reply #5

QWEST46 — Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:11:09 GMT

Hi bobp. I've read a lot of your post. You seem to be an expert when it comes to the lottery and so i just wanted to get your opinion (as well as others who would like to share) on the program windows lotto pro 2004 . Have u ever tried it? If so, where does it stand compared to all the other programs? I'm basically looking for a program that eliminates digits for pick 3/4, rather than predicting numbers. Lotto Pro seemed to work more times than not from my experience. The only problem is that i... [ More ]

Reply #4

BobP — Mon, 26 Apr 2004 06:37:24 GMT

It's using the last three steps in the random-walk to predict the upcomming forth step. Trouble is, the lottery doesn't walk it hops . BobP

Reply #3

Colin F — Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:09:05 GMT

RJohI couldn't agree more. The idea of limiting your selection to the past three draws is to say the least farcical.Colin F

Reply #2

paul762 — Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:55:39 GMT

it is also no use using a common sample because predictions are different even with same sample.

Reply #1

vick — Sun, 25 Apr 2004 17:16:03 GMT

you can only input 3 draws, not more

LottoSync Users - Tried This NEW Idea?!

DreamLotto — Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:51:27 GMT

Dear LottoSync Users:I don't have LottoSync yet, but I do plan to get one soon. Have you ever tried using FOUR past draws INSTEAD of THREE recommended with Guru's LottoSync?! This idea could also test the bugs in the program, complaints concerned with frequent LOW numbers. Here's how (if is not too time consuming, like I heard you need to run LottoSync overnight...?!). Alternatively FOUR different people can test a set each (on a mutually agreed common sampling rate) to save time, according to... [ More ]