one fine prediction!!

Reply #10

LANTERN — Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:15:53 GMT

June 2 2004 winning numbers:5, 24, 28, 31, 40, 41, 07 BBWell you had 3 numbers right and my reducing method did not work at all.But 3 winning numbers on 18 is not very good, but not verybad either not bad at all, you are doing something right.Get a way to reduce the numbers to 10 without cutting off the 3 winning numbers and you might not need LottoSync anymore.You are not UnderDog or whatever your name was, no more for sure, now you can go back to naming yourself LuckyHorse yes sir, that is... [ More ]

Reply #9

dynodyno — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:33:02 GMT

HI Lottosyncman, just curious, does that mean we would play those numbers that have been out, in just the next draw only or for a few draws after

Reply #8

desparado — Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:58:38 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottosyncman on May 30, 2004i lately have been fooling around with the gail howard software and have come across a chart that is hitting like pure dynamite gails last digits due what i have done is back tested the chart with the last 20 drawings for the canada bc/49 these were my findings6 numbers 1 time5 numbers 3 times4 numbers 4 times3 numbers 6 timesi chose the least 5 occuring digits in the last 5 drawings this translates into 25 numbers i would have to play to... [ More ]

Reply #7

LANTERN — Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:59:48 GMT

Filtering numbers out based on past draws and statistics.Always past draws and always statistics.

Reply #6

lottoarchitect — Mon, 31 May 2004 19:20:57 GMT

Reply #5

LANTERN — Mon, 31 May 2004 13:54:57 GMT

I made I more number reduction, so now is onlu 9 numbers.1-2-6-16-22-30-36-39-40

Reply #4

LANTERN — Mon, 31 May 2004 13:44:55 GMT

lottosyncmanNext time post all the 25 numbers and then also the reduced 18 numbers and if I see your post in time, then I will see if i can post a reduced numbers list of my own, Iwant to see how I would do at reducing the list of your numbers, but for any of this to work at all the 25 numbers have to have some winning numbers in them, or none of thiswill work at all.

Reply #3

LANTERN — Mon, 31 May 2004 13:39:28 GMT

lottosyncmanIf those numbers were for the may 29 draw, then you got 3 numbers right, if they are for the next drawing then I reduced your numbers to these: 1-2-6-9-16-22-30-36-39-40Now you only have 10 numbers to play.The trade off might be one winning number.But a lot cheaper to play.

Reply #2

devospice — Mon, 31 May 2004 13:27:04 GMT

> i chose the least 5 occuring digits in the last 5 drawings this translates> into 25 numbers i would have to playI don't follow. What do you m ean least 5 occuring digits in the last 5 drawings? ->Later.....Spice

Reply #1

paul762 — Mon, 31 May 2004 09:34:06 GMT

lottosyncman, ive got this software too, is it chart (g) last digit analysis? if so how did you get your numbers? mines just got stats.?thanks.

one fine prediction!!

lottosyncman — Mon, 31 May 2004 02:29:18 GMT

i lately have been fooling around with the gail howard software and have come across a chart that is hitting like pure dynamite gails last digits due what i have done is back tested the chart with the last 20 drawings for the canada bc/49 these were my findings6 numbers 1 time5 numbers 3 times4 numbers 4 times3 numbers 6 timesi chose the least 5 occuring digits in the last 5 drawings this translates into 25 numbers i would have to play to acheive the results above not too bad 14 out of 20 gam... [ More ]