Search

Pick 3 & Pick 4 Needing Idea's for this Grid Graph? Works all states 100% guaranteed.Reply
It's like fighting fire with fire, so why not fight random with random! The statement is a rephrase of the game premise! . Be mindful of that in your next approach. Premise every draw/event is distinct/mutually exclusive, no connected functions, meaning the event is random ! So how do you fight random with random? Historical analysis or simulations. I stopped using historical data years ago when the premise 'hit home'.
Jan 14, 2018, 6:34 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Any Ideas On Picking Position #1 on Pick 3?Reply
That's good to know how you are selecting the 0. Years ago, overdue numbers showed when they were supposed to, but the pretests screw it up, so I don't chase overdue numbers anymore. Just look how many times you wrote the 0 was out....69 TIMES?...That is simply not normal in a random event. Surely that anomaly can happen in a random event, but they don't happen as often as they do with pre-tests. I wonder how many overdue numbers showed up in the Texas pre-tests results. That would surely
Jan 17, 2017, 7:42 pm - amber123 - Lottery Systems Forum

calculate to winReply
People, pretty much are stuck with their ideals, anything outside the norm is deemed crazy. You hit it right on the nail ' members skim over the reading'. We all know the wave function in the study of trig., this function replaces and simplify all the wave charts and graphs I see on various threads- some like it simple, others like complexity. If you imagine the event as cyclic, then COS/SIN fn is very effective, knowing how to deduce the string depends on each individual. The assumption shou
Oct 9, 2014, 3:45 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

New Systems Forum just based on real stats and facts!Reply
If #3 is random event, then you contradict yourself with #2 (which is just assertion, not a fact) When you backtest a theory, the results achieved are highly dependent on the movements of the tested period. Backtesting a theory assumes that what happens in the past will happen in the future, and this assumption can cause potential risks for the strategy. In inference of data, the options are many, Bayesian concept uses PRIOR data and adjust data for predictions during and after event cycl
May 17, 2014, 11:06 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Deviation AnalysisReply
If you study the lowest drawn and the highest drawn numbers for each draw ignoring the rest then the deviation becomes more useful and can produce good results but only for the two outer numbers, the reason for this is due to the limits of the initial pool, if you split the draw result into numerical order then plot each set to a graph you will see the outer numbers are limited to around half the possibilities of the middle set of numbers , this then reflects in the overall possibility of choosi
Apr 20, 2014, 6:59 pm - Developer - Lottery Systems Forum

Any Pick3 system with past performace proof?Reply
'Consider the possibility that the draws are not random' I think the inverse of above should be assumed to see the big picture, the abstract explanation is all good, but does not negate the fact that all the balls are memory-less, your only connection or how you relate to the ' dynamics'of the event is digital identification. Lets assume all the balls have the same color wthout numbers before the event, how do you identify the precceding/successive draws? I thought all the balls has the s
Jan 17, 2014, 8:05 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Any Pick3 system with past performace proof?Reply
Where do you place the intuitional part?, it seems everything is relegated to this machine. Seriously, you think you need SERIOUS analysis for this random event? SCENERIO Imagine 9 white balls without identification(Digits) in a hopper, can you differentiate the outcomes of preceeding and sequent draws? All your analysis is based on the fact that the balls are numbered, take the IDs out of the picture and try to predict these outcomes. The balls have no memory, hence preceeding has no impact
Jan 14, 2014, 7:39 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Number One Number:Reply
How do find the statistics for all the states combined to get the number one each day. That all depends. If you're looking for a magical formula that works everytime, don't waste your time. I only do it cause I get bored. Even though I know once i find something good it gets cold, ha ha, then finding patterns that are very rare become an exciting event. I'm still waiting for that event. Good luck !
Aug 14, 2012, 11:53 pm - onlymoney - Lottery Systems Forum

The End GameReply
Hi, I look at it from this point...Winning the first or second prize in one of the big jackpot games is a life changing event. Winning at pick 3/4, even though nice, is not a life changing event. As far as the complexities and odds of harder games, it makes me want to do them that much more. *S* This is one of those topics at the LP where the members fall into different camps. The nice thing here is that there is room for everybody, reguardless preference. Best of Luck
Jun 16, 2011, 1:19 am - JKING - Lottery Systems Forum

If you Ever Come out with a system that Cracks Powerball with 1 Ticket: Rules of Engagement..Reply
Last time i checked: you never reduce the odds, they stay the same on every each draw for any lottery game. Its a classic and common mistake to believe that you know some event will occur or not occur based on past results. Why would that be? Every ball is just as likely to show up each time. It is very apparent that most people on this site dont have much knowledge about mathematics or probability or statistics. They are simply desperate to win some jackpot. Numbers don't mean much, they just a
Apr 14, 2010, 11:22 pm - benmas - Lottery Systems Forum