Search

P-4 wave MatrixReply
I change picks at end of span, is cost effective . When you say dbls are hiding, nobody knows for a fact, the event is random, your only tool is the time frame.
Jan 29, 2014, 12:43 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Adjacent numbersReply
Is best to Take 2 draw sets at a time, generate your picks by format, group the picks into units, 10's, 20's ........, compare the two groups from the two sets and wage for x number of draws(time frame to established after ample test) I subscribe to ideal of the event been random, so for large games, your time frame should be longer.GL
Nov 17, 2013, 5:57 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

How Many Drawings in a Row?Reply
1. The event is RANDOM 2.'How many drawings in a row would SOMETHING', explain SOMETHING 3. Since the event is random, consistency is a bit of a stretch for any system. 4.Focus more on Prize RATIO (I consider 30% hit ratio positive, odds is not probability). 5.Large picks may mean high hit ratio, but is not cost effective.
Nov 14, 2013, 7:43 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

How Many Drawings in a Row?Reply
Hmm, I guess I should have been a little more specific. By something I didn't mean a specific ball/number, more like an event for prediction (I don't know what else to call it). Example: A group of numbers for elimination. To ensure consistency, the method of number selection stays the same throughout the testing phase (but the actual numbers produced by the method vary from draw to draw). The prediction event of importance would be elimination. If none of the numbers hit, it is a success, if
Oct 19, 2013, 3:58 am - Lottonomics - Lottery Systems Forum

Man finds winning numbers in strings of PI (Video)Reply
That would indicate a random event. I write this because I believe this system is doing much better than Random shuffles. But I'd like to see if an RNG can do better, or would it be the same? Maybe I'll try a test side by side. random vs this system. It's a good way to guage if i'm wasting my time or not. I don't think i am because i've never seen a random event do as well as a thought out plan to look for that loophole. Tweaking raw data is the basis for any progressive analysis and outpu
Oct 20, 2012, 11:34 pm - onlymoney - Lottery Systems Forum

I have a sytem to generate numberReply
Hello, white, instead of looking for groups that have not yet come out of total bets on a lottery, you must seek, pairs and trios of the results already aconteram, because the repetition An event or part of it (pairs and triplets) is the secret of probability, then it is procuarar pairs and trios from the list of already aconteram sweepstakes, and see how these pairs and trios can Bring to see evidence or numbers that are missing to complete the bet,
Jul 13, 2012, 9:07 am - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.Reply
That is what i am seeing each time i do a back test RL. Over the course of time a coin will average a certain percentage of heads and tails. We are trying to play the best educated average with data to back it up. Random does have order just need to unthink our minds long enough to recognize the order we are trying to capture. DM lets us create those as close to what we believe and hope will happen on the next event. dld
Jun 10, 2012, 10:01 am - dld7763 - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottery analysis software?Reply
hello, meskhov, past performance has no impact on anything for the future, because of the randomness of the game, you can confidently predict only a part of the result The repetition of a key event is the probability, but the total control is impossible Due to the large number of conbina oes, mathematics will always be 60% and 40% random Varying this percentage,
Apr 20, 2012, 11:41 am - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

System for Decades of Dollars...Reply
Hello, pumpi, we have to provide standards for the vertical position, then either the digit or not this is in default for more than one drawing, trying to predict a draw (single event) is impossible, let's try the standard 80/20 of hit 20 of 100 draws
Feb 6, 2012, 5:34 pm - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

G.A.T. Engine 2.0Reply
In a true random event this can be said and being undisputable. In the case of lotteries, when managing to have 5x or 10x improvements over probability, this tells me they are related somehow and it is what I call reduced randomness and actually try to exploit. If you call it 5th or 6th cousins, so be it but they are related. Otherwise, there is absolutely no reason why I get such hit improvements, but they are there.
Dec 24, 2011, 12:07 pm - lottoarchitect - Lottery Systems Forum