Search

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Naw, It takes quite a bit for me to be impressed. That was actually a very happy that he, (and everyone else that wins) won. I know what the human brain is capable of, so it's got nothing to do with impressed. I'm just actually happy for him that he got another win. The statistics are a little different than the odds are. They are marked as to what the Lotteries say they are, and that was what I was talking about. According to their odds, he did better than they say they are. Their odds ar
Mar 19, 2013, 10:15 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
HEY Greenfox and LP family...been out of touch for a min...had to attend the funeral of one of my best friends and have been absent from LP...been trying to work on the system between time and not having any luck with wins...however after the number comes out...I see the actual win for that day in your charts...Need to really train my eyes to see what's in front of me instead of what I believe will come. I still have a system I use along with your charts especially the final one you added, and i
Jan 6, 2013, 9:40 pm - shoptoudrp - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Hi Good evening, If you play you must admit as well to loose, sometime you are in the reality sometime not. Just imagine a way of gambling against ODD with a strong opportunity to win, would be the end of any lottery. You may have a good feeling with a tool and go with it, bearing in mind that the system is watching you, not only you but all the player as well and can change the rules any time. Have fun , enjoy your wins and maybe once you will get a fabulous price for your patience,
Sep 11, 2020, 7:39 pm - jlg69 - Mathematics Forum

Tinkermen Lotto Report - General Explanation of Mathematical Discovery neededReply
I'm still waiting for an answer to my Gail Howard question. If she used math to win millions in her hey day, why isn't that math working today? I'm sure the answer will be that the math is good, it's the Users who don't know how to apply it correctly. LOL Poor Tinerman. In lieu of LP, he should have found a mathematician who could lay out one version for the World to adopt or reject. Besides, I doubt he has the skills to merge a half dozen systems, or tools, or whatever, anyway.
May 15, 2019, 5:14 pm - bobby623 - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
yimmininny4164, With the number of links you post, that FED part should have made you fat by now. Pat yourself on the back for being with the in crowd who believe everything on the internet is true. I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would threaten and can't understand why, if you were threatened, you came back. Makes no sense to me to put my health or life in that situation over something so trivial as lotteries. It comes to mind that people who play jackpot games, Power
Jul 3, 2013, 10:13 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

Why not all the Probability, Statistics, Calculus Theories applied all in 1 to lotteryReply
Evening pumpi, Just read your article here and wanted to comment real quick. This is possibly what i have been working on for years now. The part that i put on here about the square of a number is only a part of what i have been working on. Personally i know that it can be figured out and won. Thats all lottery games. They all work the same because they are all numbers. What i have been using has mathematics, probability, what has happened, pretty much everything short of quantum physics. Eve
Mar 10, 2011, 2:26 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

How do I prove my state lottery's CGNs are fixed?Reply
Being a system player, I assume all random drawings for jackpot style games have certain bias and I play accordingly. I assume: Once a combination of numbers hit, they won't hit again. Future combinations will match 0-3 about the same amount as previous winning combinations had in the same number of previous drawings. 75% of winning numbers distributing patterns are a third of the possible patterns. 80% of the time no one will win the jackpot. I assume much more but this gives you
Mar 12, 2009, 3:08 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Nickola Tesla Best NumberReply
Hello again edessa, Thank you! I do the same for yours and many others on here. Yes. Electrical and other studies. I know we have to look at what we don't see as well as what we do to get the results we are looking for sometimes. If it was all right there in front of our faces, it would all be easy, everyone would win and it wouldn't really be worth much would it? I mean $30 million spread across 300 million is only .10 a piece. An EE? No. You have to be smart to get into that. I'm not
Jun 24, 2020, 10:19 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

BETA - Neural Network in Java. Numbers PredictorReply
The idea of machine learning is to help you decrease the marginal error with respect to an output of events given the likelihood of another event occurring. The law of average indicates that the principle that supposes most future events are likely to balance any past deviation from a presumed average - something that machine learning allows to visualize easier, rather than manually filling pages and pages of manual statistical calculations. In my subjective opinion, Randomness doesn't exist.
Aug 26, 2017, 4:18 pm - osmannica2001 - Mathematics Forum

Mathematics and the LotteryReply
I'll try to be the first to say this, You can win the Mega Million by a Lucky Chance, Either its by someone dropping their ticket or throwing it away, and you by Destiny picked it up and see that you won Millions, Your Kid or Grand kid can jump up in the middle of the night from out of dead sleep and shout out 4 numbers and you by chance can play them and win a Straight hit easy, This Game really needs to be stopped, Its even sending folks Crazy Discussing theories on foolis
Aug 28, 2014, 6:57 pm - samgirl280 - Mathematics Forum