Search

All The BrainsReply
Does anyone think the lotteries just might be running their own tests? While people here are trying to crack the code with relatively limited resources do you think that the lotteries just might have people employed to make sure the code can't be cracked, with up to the minute technology, and a steady stram of millions of dollars pouring in every week to finance that technology?
Jun 1, 2011, 7:15 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Systems Forum

You guys want to make some money?Reply
ah, reverse engineering. That's how we got all our neat inventions reverse engineering alien technology.
Mar 24, 2006, 8:49 pm - fast eddie - Lottery Systems Forum

WintrackReply
If you can't backtest it, don't buy it. In my opinion every last one of the systems promoted by Wintrack is nothing more than dog manure. Don't waste your time and especially your money on any of this garbage crap. Their slick promotions campaign are designed to take advantage of the unseasoned newbie with little to no knowledge of lottery systems. Besides, who in the hell, especially in this day and age of technology, sends you a system on a CD disk in US Postal Mail? Who does that? No, Really?
Mar 4, 2013, 2:02 am - paymenow - Lottery Systems Forum

Taking the Mystery out of Picking Numbers (jackpot games)Reply
I subscribe to the theory either we never learn to manipulate time or for some reason we don't. It's also possible we never develop it passed a certain point, where travel is limited to a decade or something. (Of course if travel were limited to a decade we could bring the technology back a decade to the point we were able to reach our goal). The reasoning behind the idea that we never develop time travel is if we had at any point in the future did, why would we not bring clean energy to past
Aug 13, 2015, 9:42 pm - garyo1954 - Lottery Systems Forum

For those interested in Recurrence AnalysisReply
Fortunately i found something a little more powerfull than recurrence analysis, recurrence analysis should never be descarted like how i said, but if they could only use the technology that they are employing in recurrence analysis and use it in this system/theory....It will be even bettter.... https://www.lotterypost.com/blogcomments.asp?i=23082 and this will be more powerfull than recurrence analysis...But again if they could only use the technology/effort they are using in recurrence an
Jul 6, 2008, 11:37 pm - pumpi76 - Lottery Systems Forum

What is the best type of programming to study lotteries?Reply
Felictia Dr. Dingsbums and do nut boter, buy a faster computer, there is one in China. Better is to get PHD's first in Physics, Mathematics, Technology and other. When you are finished with that, you will buy one quickpick for MegaMillions like all the others.
Jun 23, 2016, 11:46 am - Sunglasses - Lottery Systems Forum

Taking the Mystery out of Picking Numbers (jackpot games)Reply
It would scare me to see a whole unit go down. It scary to think the technology they have when they can do that.
Aug 18, 2015, 12:26 pm - garyo1954 - Lottery Systems Forum

How to GEt Win For Life: A Strategy Using Key Wheel with Balanced WheelReply
but this is not important...the state lottery needs to have a lottery code for certain VIP s that s why they need to have RNG...Like an Emergency code...What happens jokingly if a vicepresident is been framed and he needs some money or an architect or someone is closed to developing the latest state of the art technology but needs $10,000....
Jun 10, 2010, 10:33 am - pumpi76 - Lottery Systems Forum

Good RSS or XML feeds for lottery numbers?Reply
By the way, Lottery Post and USA Mega have a superior technology to most state lottery web sites, and when those other sites wither and go down under the pressure of traffic, both Lottery Post and USA Mega stay up and running. Also, both sites show the results as fast or faster than every other non-government web site on the Internet. Usually a few seconds or a minute after the official site shows the results.
Nov 3, 2006, 8:23 pm - Todd - Lottery Systems Forum

RANDOM/
Hey Folks, Correct me if I'm wrong, that there is no true random pick from a computer, that we don't have the technology to do so. that the math to do it is to vast. that you could flip a coin X amount of times and be more random that the worlds super computers, Doc Digit
Jun 13, 2004, 4:26 pm - DOC-DIGIT - Lottery Systems Forum