Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 21, 2014, 6:17 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Aaron Donahue, Mystery of X, Crowley

Topic closed. 11 replies. Last post 6 years ago by kellmellus55.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
New Member
cleveland
United States
Member #23061
October 7, 2005
40 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 25, 2008, 7:29 am - IP Logged

 I know this topic has  been discussed alot in the past.  So I was  researching  this topic.   I was reading more about  Aaron and he said he discovered this formula for predicting  the future   while  trying  to uncover  the meaning  of a letter and number combination  from Aleister Crowley's  Book Of  the Law.   

 It says " This book and it's many puzzles  is said to have been given to Crowley in 1904  by a force that came to him in Cairo, Egypt.  Even Crowley could not explain the meaning of the letter and number combination:  4638 ABK24 ALGMOR3YX 24 89 RPSTOVAL  It was while exploring the Crowley puzzle that Aaron acquired a formula that has helped him unlock numeric secrets of not only the present but also the future."

  So if  Aaron Donahue  discovered this  secret formula that can predict  lottery numbers  while  trying  dicipher the meaning of Mr. Crowley's  formula, then that leads me to believe  that  this code  or another code within this  book  is probably  the secret  to figuring out  what "X"  is in his formula. 

 There are other numerical  puzzles  in this  book  here is a few examples;

"My number is 11, and my word is  Abrahadabra."

"Sixty-one the jews call it; I call it eight, eighty, four hundred and eighteen. But they have the half; unite by thine art so that all disappear. My prophet is a fool with his one, one, one"

"I am Nuit, and my word is six and fifty. Divide, add, multiply, and understand."

My number is nine by the fools, but with the just I am eight, and one in eight: which is vital, for I am none indeed. The empress and the king are not of me; for there is a further secret. I am the Empress and the Hierophant. Thus eleven, as my bride is eleven."

  Aaron Donahue  also discusses  what some of these  paragraphs might mean.  He  wrote " Crowley added the numbers  8+80+418=506. Then he added 506+61 to get 567, which takes him to a numeric blank wall. Thus Crowley reversed the number 506 to 605, then added 61 and got 666."

 In another paragraph he wrote "Crowley next divided 666 by six to get 111, the magick square of the sun.  Crowley suggests that 111 equals the hebrew letter representing Aleph, which the tarot card recognizes as the fool with a value of zero"

  Aaron describes  how  what Crowley meant  when he wrote "Divide, add, multiply and understand, I am Nuit and my word is six and fifty.  Aaron wrote "He added 6+50=56.  Then he divided 6 by 50 and came up with 0.12 "

 Aaron also wrote  things such as " I believe the formula for breaking the barriers of time is only one of the many secret messages buried in that strange combination of letters and numbers in Crowley's Book Of The Law. The Book of the Law, or Liber al vel Legis, is closely linked to the ancient book of numbers, the Cabala"

 Aaron also wrote, Crowley was so intrigued by the number 418  that he wrote volumes about is's magickal values"

  Nuit said her word was six and fifty. Thos are two distinct numbers that we must address before doing the mathematics in her formula. Adding the numbers 5 and 6  gives us a sum of 11.   and this is among the more interesting numbers to be found so far. From the Golden Dawn we learn the number 11 represents the Magnum Opus.    Hadit says in Chapter two: I am the Empress and the Hierophant, thus eleven as my bride is eleven.  Nuit also instructs us to multiply. Fifty times six produces the number 300.  All the secrets  within this book seem to be numeric in nature. to understand them, one must  study the cabala and other formulas the old masters used in looking at numbers.

 So all of the special numbers written in the Book of the Law  are  11, 56, 61, 8, 80, 418, 111, 46, 38, 4638, 24, 89, 90, 93, and 718.

  So these  numbers  probably  have something to do with Aarons  secret of "X"   that he puts into his  formula (x/pi+666, etc)  Every possible  pick 3  combination  has  more than  1  x value assigned to it for sure.   So there might not be just  1  secret of "X"  that Aaron  uses, there's probably  a few that he  cross compares  to each other to determine  the next  pick 3 number to be drawn.

    Avatar
    New Member
    cleveland
    United States
    Member #23061
    October 7, 2005
    40 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 25, 2008, 8:16 am - IP Logged

     I'm also willing to bet that  the secret numbers of "X" is not just  based on the last  3 digit number that was last drawn.  If that was the case  the same numbers  would  always be drawn one after another.  For example  if  388  was drawn  today  and yesterday  033  was drawn,  then  the number  388 would almost always be drawn after the 033  number  was drawn.  In other words, it would always be the same  24  or so numbers  that keep showing up everytime 033 is drawn.  It's probably  based on more than just the last  drawing , then that's put into another formula.  It's  probably based on the last  2, 3, or more  drawings (maybe a months worth who knows)  and all those are put into his formula somehow. No way is it just based on the last  3 digits that were drawn. 

      Mickie's avatar - Lottery-008.jpg
      Spring Lake
      United States
      Member #313
      April 26, 2002
      181 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: August 25, 2008, 8:28 am - IP Logged

      How about Saturday's Numbers>

      Mickie

      MickieDisney

        Avatar
        New Member
        cleveland
        United States
        Member #23061
        October 7, 2005
        40 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: August 25, 2008, 8:29 pm - IP Logged

        Also  something  I noticed was  what  x values  that  Aaron  used to put in his formulas   that correspond  to the last  lottery drawing. Aaron predicted  the Michigan lottery   from May 21, 2003  to  May 27 2003, the evening drawings only. He didn't start predicting until the 21st.

        May 15th drawing results=235                                                                      May16th= 743                                                                                               May 17th= 058                                                                                              May 18th= 255                                                                                              My 19th  = 215                                                                                              May 20th= 676                                                                                              may 21th= 615

        May 21= 615  last  drawing  before  he started to predict the next              Aaron came up with 862  and 892  on this date, which he used  as the value of X.  So he used  the 862 or 892  to put into his  main formula (x/pi+666) to predict the next draw which was 864.

        May 22=864 was drawn (aaron's secret formula of X  came up with the number 382 which was the value of X  for the next draw. So he used 382 as the value of x which he put into his main 4 permutations of his formula to predict the next draw which was 090.

        May 23=090  (Aaron's secret  X formula gave him the numbers 567, 427, and 471  which he used  to predict the next draw which was 186. Notice he put  3 different x values into his formula and compared the results of all 3 of these  x values put into the formula

        May 24=186  (Aaron  got  176 which he replaced the "X"  with in his formula which predicted the next draw which was 601

        May 25=601  (Aaron's formula to discover what "X"  is, gave him the numbers 462, 345, and 402.  So he used  those  3 numbers as X"  and ran them through his main formula (X/pi+666, X/pi-666 etc)  to predict the next draw which was 813.

        May 26 -813 (Aaron's came up with the numbers  549, 159, 158 and 246 which he used to predict the next draw which was 783.

        May 27 =783

        But if Aaron also included the draw history  in the days leading up to the week he predicted, then there may be more numbers that he put into his formula to come up with these daily predictions.  He  was only playing the evening draws, but  How do we know if he separated the day and evening draws  when he worked his system.  If he combined the day/eve draws. If thats the case  you would have to combine  the day and evening draws  on one list and factor them in.  Just because he only predicted the evening draws, doesn't mean that  he separated  the day and evening draws  when he  figured out his  systems predictions.  he may have  combined the day/eve draws.  then again he may have just looked at the evening draws.  So when  testing to see what may be the value of X, it's probably best to look at his  predictions for the Michigan  lottery and  try to see how he came up with  his  values  of X  for each of the draws he predicted.  The evening draws  separated and the day/eve draws combined since we don't know if he  combined eve/day draws  or not.

          kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
          Clarkston,MI
          United States
          Member #35082
          March 12, 2006
          594 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: August 25, 2008, 9:05 pm - IP Logged

          The time now is 1825 May 22, 2003.

           

          Time 1833

          ADP002/ 220503 EMD3


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          289 758 -574 304 -120
          298 761 -571 307 -117
          829 930 -402 476 52
          892 950 -382 496 72
          928 961 -371 507 83
          982 979 -353 525 101

           

          Drawing Results Thu. May 22, 2003: 864

           

          The Michigan Daily 3 results for the evening of May 22, 2003 are 8,6, and 4 in this order.

          The below posting represents the error that is common for those viewers determining a position for the number 9. As you can see the sum of 862 plus 666 divided by pi will give us a rounded number of 486.

          I commonly make the error of inverting 6 and 9 as these symbols apart from their meaning, are identical in shape and size. As you learn how to remote view numbers, beware of the relative position of 9 and 6. Do not confuse these two numbers as I have done on this day.


          a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          2 8 6 286 757 -575 303 -121
          2 6 8 268 751 -581 297 -127< br> 8 2 6 826 929 -403 475 51
          8 6 2 862 940 -392 486 62
          6 2 8 628 866 -466 412 -12
          6 8 2 682 883 -449 429 5


          a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          2 8 9 289 758 -574 304 -120
          2 9 8 298 761 -571 307 -117
          8 2 9 829 930 -402 476 52
          8 9 2 892 950 -382 496 72
          9 2 8 928 961 -371 507 83
          9 8 2 982 979 -353 525 101

           

          As you study the graphs, note that the same position of 892 will yield the incorrect number of 496 as the number 862 yields the correct number of 486. Again the difference between 6 and 9 may seem slight to the viewer although the outcome is less than perfect.

          A less than perfect outcome is not acceptable and this is why more than one session should be conducted to check for any error. You will in the future see a series of postings screening for any possible error.

          The idea exists that one might observe only the numbers that match.

          Modification of the formula can yield other numbers and a pattern of sequence can be recognized once the proper entrainment, skill, and environment of the viewer is achieved.

          You are now observing a system of communication that will overcome all others presently known. It will be developed not in secrecy but here before us all.

          -Aaron C. Donahue




           

          The time now is 1730. It is Friday, May 23, 2003.

           

          ADP003/ 230503 EMD3


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          328 770 -562 316 -108
          382 788 -544 334 -90
          238 742 -590 288 -136
          283 756 -576 302 -122
          832 931 -401 477 53
          823 928 -404 474 50

           

          Drawing Results Fri. May 23, 2003: 090




           

          ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          567 846 -486 392 -32
          576 849 -483 395 -29
          657 875 -457 421 -3
          675 881 -451 427 3
          756 907 -425 453 29
          765 910 -422 456 32

           

          Here is something interesting. I am attempting to isolate within my completed data an exact number. The EMD-R postings are experimental. Now that it is the week-end holiday, why not?

           

          ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R

           

          The next set of remote viewed numbers are 427 and 147. I will now compare these two sets with the previous number of 567.

          Note any matching numbers.


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          427 802 -530 348 -76
          472 816 -516 362 -62
          247 745 -587 291 -133
          274 753 -579 299 -125
          742 902 -430 448 24
          724 896 -436 442 18


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          147 713 -619 259 -165
          174 721 -611 267 -157
          417 799 -533 345 -79
          471 816 -516 362 -62
          714 893 -439 439 15
          741 902 -430 448 24



           




           

          Drawing Results Sat. May 24, 2003: 186



           

          The time now is 1918, Sunday, May 25, 2003.

           

          ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          453 810 -522 356 -68
          435 804 -528 350 -74
          543 839 -493 385 -39
          534 836 -496 382 -42
          345 776 -556 322 -102
          354 779 -553 325 -99

           

          This EMD3-H posting is an experiment revealing yet another way to access non-historical information.

           

          ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          453 810 -522 356 -68
          435 804 -528 350 -74
          543 839 -493 385 -39
          534 836 -496 382 -42
          345 776 -556 322 -102
          354 779 -553 325 -99


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          42 679 -653 225 -199
          24 674 -658 220 -204
          402 794 -538 340 -84
          420 800 -532 346 -78
          204 731 -601 277 -147
          240 742 -590 288 -136


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          176 722 -610 268 -156
          167 719 -613 265 -159
          716 894 -438 440 16
          761 908 -424 454 30
          617 862 -470 408 -16
          671 880 -452 426 2

           

          A third session is cued as reference to the second being a number that is known as historical data! The implications of this are profound.



           




           

          Drawing Results Sun. May 25, 2003: 601

           

          The Winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for the evening of Sunday, May 25, 2003 are 6,0, and 1 in this order.

           

          ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E

          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          453 810 -522 356 -68
          435 804 -528 350 -74
          543 839 -493 385 -39
          534 836 -496 382 -42
          345 776 -556 322 -102
          354 779 -553 325 -99

           

          A second session cued for historical data produced 042 that in turn, produced the correct number.


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          42 679 -653 225 -199
          24 674 -658 220 -204
          402 794 -538 340 -84
          420 800 -532 346 -78
          204 731 -601 277 -147
          240 742 -590 288 -136

           

          This correct number was isolated as per a third session and the number 176 reveals -160, 16, and -16. These numbers match only one number from the previous graph of numbers. This number is -601.


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          176 722 -610 268 -156
          167 719 -613 265 -159
          716 894 -438 440 16
          761 908 -424 454 30
          617 862 -470 408 -16
          671 880 -452 426 2

           

          The implications of this are profound. A number that does not yet exist can be identified and therefore limited as historical information! There is so much more to show you.

          -Aaron C. Donahue




           

          The time now is 1923, Monday, May 26, 2003.

           

          ADP006/ 260503 EMD3-H

           

          Comment:

          I have a strange set of experimental numbers today. This could mean a direct number is realized. We shall see...


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          954 970 -362 516 92
          945 967 -365 513 89
          594 855 -477 401 -23
          549 841 -491 387 -37
          495 824 -508 370 -54
          459 812 -520 358 -66


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          951 969 -363 515 91
          915 957 -375 503 79
          591 854 -478 400 -24
          519 831 -501 377 -47
          195 728 -604 274 -150
          159 717 -615 263 -161


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          851 937 -395 483 59
          815 925 -407 471 47
          581 851 -481 397 -27
          518 831 -501 377 -47
          185 725 -607 271 -153
          158 716 -616 262 -162


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          951 969 -363 515 91
          915 957 -375 503 79
          591 854 -478 400 -24
          519 831 -501 377 -47
          195 728 -604 274 -150
          159 717 -615 263 -161


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          851 937 -395 483 59
          815 925 -407 471 47
          581 851 -481 397 -27
          518 831 -501 377 -47
          185 725 -607 271 -153
          158 716 -616 262 -162


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          462 813 -519 359 -65
          426 802 -530 348 -76
          642 870 -462 416 -8
          624 865 -467 411 -13
          246 744 -588 290 -134
          264 750 -582 296 -128

           

          As I have stated, these numbers are strange. I believe that we may have a direct number from the initial session. This is why I love to experiment with the formula. There is so much to learn!


          -Aaron C. Donahue

          Drawing Results Mon. May 26, 2003: 813

           

          Whoa! The numbers are in. This EMD3-H cueing experiment produced some strange numbers worth a second look. I will try cueing this blind with another viewer to further understand what is going on here...

          The winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for Monday, May 26, 2003 are 8,1, and 3 in this order.


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          954 970 -362 516 92
          945 967 -365 513 89
          594 855 -477 401 -23
          549 841 -491 387 -37
          495 824 -508 370 -54
          459 812 -520 358 -66


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          951 969 -363 515 91
          915 957 -375 503 79
          591 854 -478 400 -24
          519 831 -501 377 -47
          195 728 -604 274 -150
          159 717 -615 263 -161


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          851 937 -395 483 59
          815 925 -407 471 47
          581 851 -481 397 -27
          518 831 -501 377 -47
          185 725 -607 271 -153
          158 716 -616 262 -162


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          462 813 -519 359 -65
          426 802 -530 348 -76
          642 870 -462 416 -8
          624 865 -467 411 -13
          246 744 -588 290 -134
          264 750 -582 296 -128


          x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

          513 829 -503 375 -49
          531 835 -497 381 -43
          153 715 -617 261 -163
          135 709 -623 255 -169
          351 778 -554 324 -100
          315 766 -566 312 -112

           

          The numbers 462 and 513 are the result of the identical EMD3-H cueing as before. These numbers are used to isolate the correct numbers 813 and 831. Determining a correct pattern of sequence is possible with specialized cueing and a technique that I will share with you not now.

          I am pleased with the result of today's experiment.

          -Aaron C. Donahue

            kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
            Clarkston,MI
            United States
            Member #35082
            March 12, 2006
            594 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: August 25, 2008, 9:25 pm - IP Logged

            Another interesting PI discussion among others can also be seen at this link:

            http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130829

             

            Good Luck

              garyo1954's avatar - garyo
              Dallas, Texas
              United States
              Member #4549
              May 2, 2004
              1212 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: August 25, 2008, 10:07 pm - IP Logged

              Another interesting PI discussion among others can also be seen at this link:

              http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130829

               

              Good Luck

              I actually read all 23 pages of that thread only to learn Cashman never revealed his "family secret."

              I also searched for info on Aaron Donahue and found a great deal of negative:

              http://www.pedurabo10.tripod.com/theuglytruthaboutaaroncdonahue/index.html

              Has anyone located the site where he posted his predictions?

                kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
                Clarkston,MI
                United States
                Member #35082
                March 12, 2006
                594 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: August 25, 2008, 10:52 pm - IP Logged

                I actually read all 23 pages of that thread only to learn Cashman never revealed his "family secret."

                I also searched for info on Aaron Donahue and found a great deal of negative:

                http://www.pedurabo10.tripod.com/theuglytruthaboutaaroncdonahue/index.html

                Has anyone located the site where he posted his predictions?

                http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/id501.html

                 

                good luck

                  Avatar
                  New Member
                  cleveland
                  United States
                  Member #23061
                  October 7, 2005
                  40 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: August 25, 2008, 11:17 pm - IP Logged

                  Yes, thanks for posting  his actual predictions.   I'm aware of the negative  things  that are said about him.  All I know  is  a fact is a fact.  he predicted those winning numbers. 

                   Didn't  Cashman say that he knew what  "X"  was?  but he thought it would be best if we figured it out for ourselves.  But all the clues he gave were so vague  that nobody figured it out.  Maybe  Cashman will come up and  give us some more  clues to find what  X is in Aarons  formula...

                    kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
                    Clarkston,MI
                    United States
                    Member #35082
                    March 12, 2006
                    594 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: August 26, 2008, 11:51 am - IP Logged

                    Another interesting PI discussion among others can also be seen at this link

                     

                    http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130050

                      garyo1954's avatar - garyo
                      Dallas, Texas
                      United States
                      Member #4549
                      May 2, 2004
                      1212 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: August 26, 2008, 4:27 pm - IP Logged
                      Looking at what he says,  I'm neutral. I realize his dad is writing the page on his success, and being a parent, I know we all expect the best for our sons and daughters. And in that way we are sometimes blind to their failings. 
                      I notice he posted the formula on December 13th, 2002, but didn't start predicting numbers until May, 2003. In my mind, if he had no working knowledge of Pick 3 games to begin with, how did he know the formula worked?
                      And then considering his formula, it appears you still have to play between 40 - 60 numbers to cover them boxed. Straight would be 240 - 360 numbers.  
                      Finally, where I do believe if a person could remote view three converging paths leading up to the drawing they could determine the number prior to the drawing, but I don't believe that is what he has done here.
                      I think he tells us as much when he says that this is not the complete formula and the rest is locked in his head.
                      Aaron later mystified followers with an announcement that on Friday the 13th of December, 2002, he would disclose a code for getting lottery numbers before they are drawn. The date was awaited with much anticipation. On that day his opening page displayed yet another mystery formula. There was an X over pi, within parenthesis, followed by a plus sign and the numbers 666.

                       

                        For a while we missed the importance of the formula. Simplistic in its characters, it glares at you from http://ummo.cc. It confounds the mind because it appears incomplete. Without an equal symbol, it lacks the characteristics of an algebra problem. So what is this?

                       

                        Aaron said the formula "calibrates where the human brain is in time.The brain itself is a time machine. The use of the formula is simple. Humans will be able to use it to see future events and even see future numbers."

                       

                        He warns that the formula posted on his site isn't complete. He has the rest of it locked in his head.
                        kellmellus55's avatar - 53882ptr8it6sv1
                        Clarkston,MI
                        United States
                        Member #35082
                        March 12, 2006
                        594 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: August 29, 2008, 9:11 am - IP Logged
                        The Mystery Formula
                         
                         
                        "Aye! listen to the numbers & the words: 4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L. What meaneth this, o prophet? Thou knowest not; nor shalt thou know ever. There cometh one to follow thee: he shall expound it. But remember, o chose none, to be me; to follow the love of Nu in the star-lit heaven; to look forth upon men, to tell them this glad word." Liber al vel Legis 2:75-76
                         
                        I find it odd that countless members of the O.T.O., including Crowley, failed to take the words of this passage literally. The mysterious numbers and letters were delivered. The scribe then was asked "What meaneth this, o prophet? Thou knowest not; nor shalt thou know ever."
                         
                        That seems clear to me. Yet Crowley reasoned that because he knew "Not," the secret name for Had, he might be entitled to discover the secret message anyway. He devoted a lot of time calculating numbers and letters, presenting possible solutions to this great mystery of puzzles.