All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Home -> Forums -> Lottery Systems -> formula for predicting lottery numbers Dallas, TX United States Member #60771 April 12, 2008 3857 Posts Offline | | Posted: October 21, 2009, 4:48 pm - IP Logged | |
Random or not I'm going to win it. I have my own formula, I'm DiamondPalace! | | |
United States Member #75870 June 1, 2009 5350 Posts Offline
| | Posted: October 21, 2009, 9:31 pm - IP Logged | |
Sorry to bust your bubble, but it's already been shown that randomness has patterns. Back in the late 70's early 80's, they had a computer randomly place a dot on a piece of paper at fast intervals. After a few hours, a snowflake looking picture had formed. If black in roulette showed 20 times in a row, the contemporary wisdom taught in Universities is that the 21st time has an equal chance of showing black AGAIN....! That may be true.....but what would you bet on.... for the 21st spin? The more one thing goes in a straight line, the more it wants to deviate. It's called "Random Number Displacement". Or RND. The mere fact that a number is overdue and shows, proves patterns do exist. Chaos always wants to show it's head. The key is to know where and when the chaos will take over....(RND), and bet accordingly. If you know that after a certain point, shortly after the RND, it will revert back to pattern, then you have a scoop on patterns and behaviors. For example. In my state Florida, After a number "1" shows, a "7" appears, for the most part, and visa versa. Other buddy numbers work that way also. | | |
United States Member #75870 June 1, 2009 5350 Posts Offline
| | Posted: October 21, 2009, 9:39 pm - IP Logged | |
Sorry to bust your bubble, but it's already been shown that randomness has patterns. Back in the late 70's early 80's, they had a computer randomly place a dot on a piece of paper at fast intervals. After a few hours, a snowflake looking picture had formed. If black in roulette showed 20 times in a row, the contemporary wisdom taught in Universities is that the 21st time has an equal chance of showing black AGAIN....! That may be true.....but what would you bet on.... for the 21st spin? The more one thing goes in a straight line, the more it wants to deviate. It's called "Random Number Displacement". Or RND. The mere fact that a number is overdue and shows, proves patterns do exist. Chaos always wants to show it's head. The key is to know where and when the chaos will take over....(RND), and bet accordingly. If you know that after a certain point, shortly after the RND, it will revert back to pattern, then you have a scoop on patterns and behaviors. For example. In my state Florida, After a number "1" shows, a "7" appears, for the most part, and visa versa. Other buddy numbers work that way also. The other tool is called "Pattern verification". Once the pattern has been found, bets can be altered to fit accordingly. There are folks who do nothing but look for pattern verifaction techniques in Slot machines all day long in Vegas for a living. Recap: 1. You have chaos 2. You have pattern. 3 You have RND (in between chaos and pattern). 4.RND is an alarm clock ring to remind you that you have choas on the way or pattern headed your way. A marker.... | | |
United States Member #39505 May 10, 2006 18 Posts Offline | | Posted: October 21, 2009, 10:16 pm - IP Logged | |
Formula is the key word here. Nothing you are saying has anything to do with a formula. Using possabilites, and probability is not what I am saying is impossable. I'm not talking about odds. What I am saying is that plugging a number into an EQUATION and getting a result that will be the next winning number is IMPOSSABLE. Don't try to prove me wrong but try rather to prove yourselves right. | | |
United States Member #75870 June 1, 2009 5350 Posts Offline
| | Posted: October 21, 2009, 11:03 pm - IP Logged | |
Formula is the key word here. Nothing you are saying has anything to do with a formula. Using possabilites, and probability is not what I am saying is impossable. I'm not talking about odds. What I am saying is that plugging a number into an EQUATION and getting a result that will be the next winning number is IMPOSSABLE. Don't try to prove me wrong but try rather to prove yourselves right. What I am saying is that plugging a number into an EQUATION and getting a result that will be the next winning number is IMPOSSABLE. Not if the equation that determined the final set to be played was an equation that adapted with every winning number. It morphed accordingly. Not stationary. That kind of program would be unbelievable. Possible, yet unattainable with the current technology. The problem is replacing the important variables with the correct numbers. Nothing is impossible. At any given moment, it may be improbable, but never impossible. Anything is possible. | | |
United States Member #69671 January 5, 2009 1947 Posts Offline | | Posted: October 21, 2009, 11:09 pm - IP Logged | |
Why alot of people struggle with the lottery is b/c they dont put each number in its proper group. I did that about 3 wks ago and I can tell you that there are some amazing patterns that come out which if you have confidence in the next day (2 draws) that a particular category of numbers will show it will decrease the numbers you have to play, thus, allowing you to combo them for str8 hits "Many Strategies|One System" | | |
NASHVILLE, TENN United States Member #33768 February 20, 2006 866 Posts Offline | | Posted: October 25, 2009, 12:33 pm - IP Logged | |
i agree on both sides. but in the state of tennessee there is no random. they know (computer programmers) that people are going to track numbers stats like longest pair out, most double due. etc. so they repeat, backstep, it is hard to predict tennessee, if you zig they zag. kid In Tennessee ( and probably in all states that use RNG ), the player is not only fighting the odds, they are up against the whim of the lotto officials. If any one player knew which combinations had the least amount of payout, he could be a winner every time. | | |
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 13921 Posts Offline | | Posted: October 25, 2009, 2:07 pm - IP Logged | |
In Tennessee ( and probably in all states that use RNG ), the player is not only fighting the odds, they are up against the whim of the lotto officials. If any one player knew which combinations had the least amount of payout, he could be a winner every time. Game NameDraw Date Draw ResultLucky SumPayout | | CASH 3 | 10/24/2009 | Evening | 106 | 7 | $33,773.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/24/2009 | Mid-Day | 356 | 14 | $30,193.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/23/2009 | Evening | 810 | 9 | $59,370.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/23/2009 | Mid-Day | 568 | 19 | $28,922.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/22/2009 | Evening | 818 | 17 | $86,568.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/22/2009 | Mid-Day | 445 | 13 | $20,115.00 | | CASH 3 | 10/21/2009 | Evening | 773 | 17 | $64,952.00 |
|
|
Tennessee does show the payouts of each combination, all you have to do is track them to see if your theory has any merit. * that which happens most * * is most likely to happen again * 
| | |
|