- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 3:40 am
You last visited
May 4, 2024, 3:20 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryPrev TopicNext Topic
-
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Sep 19, 2010
jimmy did you even look at the post .
I had 9 three's and 72 2's
I missed only TD which was 9 and I played 10 and I blocked digit 9 and it hit.
changing these two settings gave a 5 or 5 with 577 sets.
exact count
1 of 5 =1
2 of 5 = 151
3 of 5 = 53
4 of 5 = 18
5 of 5 = 1
Too bad for you because You never got nothing as usual
I missed MO lotto by two settings also last night. Never seen you do anything close to that
RL-RANDOMLOGIC,
It's too bad you can't translate your predictions into MadDog's relatively simple format of [up to] 12 WBs and 4 PBs.
You said: "Too bad for you because You never got nothing as usual"
Very true.
"I missed MO lotto by two settings also last night. Never seen you do anything close to that"
My wife knows exactly how you feel; she "almost" won the PA Big4 last night.
--Jimmy4164
-
Philadelpia/Pennsylvania
United States
Member #2,218
September 1, 2003
6,803 Posts
OfflineQuote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 19, 2010
RL-RANDOMLOGIC,
It's too bad you can't translate your predictions into MadDog's relatively simple format of [up to] 12 WBs and 4 PBs.
You said: "Too bad for you because You never got nothing as usual"
Very true.
"I missed MO lotto by two settings also last night. Never seen you do anything close to that"
My wife knows exactly how you feel; she "almost" won the PA Big4 last night.
--Jimmy4164
Jimmy what is your beef man!! Are you really a devil like your avatar?
Why can't you come over from the dark side and join forces?
Instead of nitpicking everything RL posts here. Why can't you provide anything that is positive?
So what if RL doesn't want to post any predictions in MadDogs thread. What's the big deal?
What if he did post predictions and won, what would your comment be, "oh he was just lucky??
I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff . This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month.
Bold statement yes!!. I know because I have looked at this program inside and out and I can honestly say that if someone were to devote a little time and energy into this program they will win the jackpot.
The program is easy to understand once you start using it.
When someone does win I hope they give RL a portion of their winnings or at the least acknowledge that they won using his program.
Read this thread again from the beginning. Know anyone else in the history of Lotterypost who you know of who has posted anything like RL has posted? I can't think of anyone!!
Some folks might read this thread and say to themselves I don't understand this or I don't understand that. I will say to those folks is don't give up, ask questions. Re-read the entire thread and have a pad a paper handy to write down any questions. Everyone wants a "black box" system or a program where you enter past drawings click 1 button and 100 combinations spew out. This program requires the use of the gray matter between your ears.
-
Quote: Originally posted by winsumloosesum on Sep 19, 2010
Jimmy what is your beef man!! Are you really a devil like your avatar?
Why can't you come over from the dark side and join forces?
Instead of nitpicking everything RL posts here. Why can't you provide anything that is positive?
So what if RL doesn't want to post any predictions in MadDogs thread. What's the big deal?
What if he did post predictions and won, what would your comment be, "oh he was just lucky??
I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff . This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month.
Bold statement yes!!. I know because I have looked at this program inside and out and I can honestly say that if someone were to devote a little time and energy into this program they will win the jackpot.
The program is easy to understand once you start using it.
When someone does win I hope they give RL a portion of their winnings or at the least acknowledge that they won using his program.
Read this thread again from the beginning. Know anyone else in the history of Lotterypost who you know of who has posted anything like RL has posted? I can't think of anyone!!
Some folks might read this thread and say to themselves I don't understand this or I don't understand that. I will say to those folks is don't give up, ask questions. Re-read the entire thread and have a pad a paper handy to write down any questions. Everyone wants a "black box" system or a program where you enter past drawings click 1 button and 100 combinations spew out. This program requires the use of the gray matter between your ears.
winsumloosesum,
Have you read any of the outrageous, snarling, contemptuous attacks your buddy has dumped on me. The worst one he wisely deleted once he knew I had read it. I don't take kindly to those kind of attacks. I have tried several times to ignore his drivel, but he is unpredictable and appears to have a split personality. Haven't you noticed?
"I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month."
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.
I have looked over this Thread, and contrary to you, I feel it is a pathetic attempt to [in my part of the country] GET BLOOD OUT OF A TURNIP!
"Bold statement yes!!. I know because I have looked at this program inside and out and I can honestly say that IF someone were to devote a little time and energy into this program [THEN] they will win the jackpot."
IF and THEN (implied above) are very powerful components of logic. IF you really believe your assertion, THEN what are you waiting for?
--Jimmy4164
-
Some body has a mental problem on this thread, and it's ain't me!!!
-
"I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month."
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month."
OUT OF CONTEXT. NO ONE IS PREDICTING JACKPOT WINNERS.
IT IS THE PROGRAM THAT WILL PRODUCE A WINNER, a big difference. -
I thought that for those of you playing RL's system using pen and paper perhaps the following could prove helpful.
If you see for example that in position 3 there were three high digits in a row, meaning in the 3 most recent draws you saw digits : 5, 6 , 8
most probably the digit for that position will be low i.e. 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 in the next draw.
Adam
-
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 19, 2010
winsumloosesum,
Have you read any of the outrageous, snarling, contemptuous attacks your buddy has dumped on me. The worst one he wisely deleted once he knew I had read it. I don't take kindly to those kind of attacks. I have tried several times to ignore his drivel, but he is unpredictable and appears to have a split personality. Haven't you noticed?
"I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month."
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.
I have looked over this Thread, and contrary to you, I feel it is a pathetic attempt to [in my part of the country] GET BLOOD OUT OF A TURNIP!
"Bold statement yes!!. I know because I have looked at this program inside and out and I can honestly say that IF someone were to devote a little time and energy into this program [THEN] they will win the jackpot."
IF and THEN (implied above) are very powerful components of logic. IF you really believe your assertion, THEN what are you waiting for?
--Jimmy4164
Jimmy
I have not deleted any post I have made. I don't think that it is even possible. As for the split
personality I live by a very simple rule, Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way. The thing that
gets me the most about you is that you think I don't understand you point of view. Also your con-
tinued reference to Mad Dog's challenge shows that you don't understand mine. The numbers
produced by my system mean nothing to me. Even when I check my tickets I am looking at the
digits. MD's challange uses 12 numbers, I was viewing the selections made by others and found
myself counting digits, digit totals, high digits, low digits, double odd, double even and so on. Any-
time I see numbers my mind see a series of digits. Many people played 8,9,10 digits in there number
selections and still did not do well. Count the ratio of base digits to the high digits that were used.
My point being if many digits selected produced no advantage then why not follow another method
when selecting. If most people looked at the numbers produced by my system they would most
likely choose not to play them. This shows a bias in what people think as being a good set. looking
at the numbers and then choosing to reject them because of how they look. This is a human flaw
and is as common as dirt. It would take many many drawings to produce enough data to ever
gain any advantage in making number selections except for maybe some short term plays. In a 5-40
matrix it would take a minimun of 8 drawings for all 40 numbers to show just once. Each drawing
however can contain as many as 8 of the 10 digits. I have shown that certian digits appear with a
much greater hit rate then others which can be calculated using real math. Run the data for this and
post it. My 5-39 game has 10 digits and while digit 1 is used in 13 different numbers zero is used
in only 3. All digits do not have the same chance of being drawn unlike the numbers. Mad Dog's
challenge ask for 12 WB's and 4PB's. Is this not the same thing as saying pick 47 balls that won't
hit. How can your selecting 12 balls force the other 47 not to be drawn. And on top of this you
accuse me of being disingenuous, talk about splitting personally. You challenge my methods and
then ask me to particapate in a contest that uses rules that you have condemned in other post.
Come on jim, which is it. I can see your point but you cannot see mine. I assume most understand
the odds and try not to insult their intelligence in my post, I offer my ststem as a method to
be tried. Everyone one here is looking for some way to improve play. I wish them well even if they
decide this is not for them. I have seen a few people who seem to have the uncanny ability to select
a few numbers from a larger group and get several right. I wish I could do that but I can't.
Cognitive dissonance, read Aesop's fable "The fox and the grapes" You see I know what I am up
against and since I am going to play anyway I use anything I feel will help. I happen to believe
that the human race is capable of some amazing feats.
RL
....
-
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 19, 2010
winsumloosesum,
Have you read any of the outrageous, snarling, contemptuous attacks your buddy has dumped on me. The worst one he wisely deleted once he knew I had read it. I don't take kindly to those kind of attacks. I have tried several times to ignore his drivel, but he is unpredictable and appears to have a split personality. Haven't you noticed?
"I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month."
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.
I have looked over this Thread, and contrary to you, I feel it is a pathetic attempt to [in my part of the country] GET BLOOD OUT OF A TURNIP!
"Bold statement yes!!. I know because I have looked at this program inside and out and I can honestly say that IF someone were to devote a little time and energy into this program [THEN] they will win the jackpot."
IF and THEN (implied above) are very powerful components of logic. IF you really believe your assertion, THEN what are you waiting for?
--Jimmy4164
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.
What kind of predicting is that? If you prefer to predict jackpot winners rather than numbers, at least name them. It doesn't take any smarts to know somebody will eventually win the jackpots with some numbers and 70-80% of those somebodies will be Quick-Pick players.
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
-
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Sep 20, 2010
Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month.
What kind of predicting is that? If you prefer to predict jackpot winners rather than numbers, at least name them. It doesn't take any smarts to know somebody will eventually win the jackpots with some numbers and 70-80% of those somebodies will be Quick-Pick players.
RJOh,
Above, winsumloosesum said, referring to RL-RANDOMLOGIC's RNG,
"I can tell you from my experience with lottery programs and this includes both paid and free stuff. This DOS program will help someone win a jackpot within the next month."
... and I replied,
"Predicting jackpot winners is easy. I predict there will be many Quick-Pick-Playing Jackpot winners across the US over the next month."
I guess I mistakenly assumed everyone would understand that I was telling winsumloosesum that his prediction that someone would win a jackpot with the abovementioned RNG was just as likely to happen to those who chose to use a state RNG. Sorry for my mistake.
But anyway, thanks for helping to make my point.
--Jimmy4164
-
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Sep 20, 2010
Jimmy
I have not deleted any post I have made. I don't think that it is even possible. As for the split
personality I live by a very simple rule, Lead, Follow or get the hell out of the way. The thing that
gets me the most about you is that you think I don't understand you point of view. Also your con-
tinued reference to Mad Dog's challenge shows that you don't understand mine. The numbers
produced by my system mean nothing to me. Even when I check my tickets I am looking at the
digits. MD's challange uses 12 numbers, I was viewing the selections made by others and found
myself counting digits, digit totals, high digits, low digits, double odd, double even and so on. Any-
time I see numbers my mind see a series of digits. Many people played 8,9,10 digits in there number
selections and still did not do well. Count the ratio of base digits to the high digits that were used.
My point being if many digits selected produced no advantage then why not follow another method
when selecting. If most people looked at the numbers produced by my system they would most
likely choose not to play them. This shows a bias in what people think as being a good set. looking
at the numbers and then choosing to reject them because of how they look. This is a human flaw
and is as common as dirt. It would take many many drawings to produce enough data to ever
gain any advantage in making number selections except for maybe some short term plays. In a 5-40
matrix it would take a minimun of 8 drawings for all 40 numbers to show just once. Each drawing
however can contain as many as 8 of the 10 digits. I have shown that certian digits appear with a
much greater hit rate then others which can be calculated using real math. Run the data for this and
post it. My 5-39 game has 10 digits and while digit 1 is used in 13 different numbers zero is used
in only 3. All digits do not have the same chance of being drawn unlike the numbers. Mad Dog's
challenge ask for 12 WB's and 4PB's. Is this not the same thing as saying pick 47 balls that won't
hit. How can your selecting 12 balls force the other 47 not to be drawn. And on top of this you
accuse me of being disingenuous, talk about splitting personally. You challenge my methods and
then ask me to particapate in a contest that uses rules that you have condemned in other post.
Come on jim, which is it. I can see your point but you cannot see mine. I assume most understand
the odds and try not to insult their intelligence in my post, I offer my ststem as a method to
be tried. Everyone one here is looking for some way to improve play. I wish them well even if they
decide this is not for them. I have seen a few people who seem to have the uncanny ability to select
a few numbers from a larger group and get several right. I wish I could do that but I can't.
Cognitive dissonance, read Aesop's fable "The fox and the grapes" You see I know what I am up
against and since I am going to play anyway I use anything I feel will help. I happen to believe
that the human race is capable of some amazing feats.
RL
RL-RANDOMLOGIC,
You said,
"I have not deleted any post I have made. I don't think that it is even possible."
I'm sorry sir, but this statement is just not believable coming from a person who has made 366 Posts since March 13, 2008. I saw the "Delete" button after my first submit. Besides, the management here defines quite well the 20 minutes you have to delete a post after you submit it. I won't try to paraphrase what you deleted here, as you'll only deny it.
Check here at the Boss's Blog:
https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/332
"It was much trickier to add than I had anticipated, but the Edit and Delete functions are finally available for Blogs! They have the same restrictions as Editing and Deleting your messages posted to the forums. That is, you have up to 20 minutes after you post the Blog entry to Edit and/or Delete it."
For the curious, here is a screen shot of my last post. This Delete button went away in 20 minutes, as it was programmed to do.
http://www.box.net/shared/saimbrzok2
Your reasons above for NOT being able to post [UP TO] 12 White and 4 Powerball numbers in MadDog's Challenge are not even reasons. Your words are a jumbled stream of Double Talk designed to confuse and baffle the reader. If they really were a coherent formula for producing winning betting sets, you would have no problem publishing them. You have written a DOS Based RNG!
There is an old saying where I come from, "The proof is in the Pudding." We finished our dinner long ago, and we're tired waiting for the "Pudding!"
--Jimmy4164
P.S. Is there noone reading this with the knowledge and/or courage to lend some support to what I'm saying?
-
--Jimmy4164
P.S. Is there noone reading this (your post) with the knowledge and/or courage to lend some support to what I'm saying?
Jimmy,
What you're saying isn't new, every lottery player has heard those arguments before. It doesn't take any courage to say the chance of any one winning a lottery jackpot is between slim and none when the odds are 1:14,000,000 or worst. Millions of players buy tickets every day and win nothing, so what you're saying is obvious.
Knowing all of the above players still come to LP to read about winners and what they are doing to to beat the odds. Winners just may be lucky but if they're doing something different, other players want to know. They can decide for themselves if what they read have any merit. Besides, reading all these posts is entertaining.
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
-
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Sep 20, 2010
--Jimmy4164
P.S. Is there noone reading this (your post) with the knowledge and/or courage to lend some support to what I'm saying?
Jimmy,
What you're saying isn't new, every lottery player has heard those arguments before. It doesn't take any courage to say the chance of any one winning a lottery jackpot is between slim and none when the odds are 1:14,000,000 or worst. Millions of players buy tickets every day and win nothing, so what you're saying is obvious.
Knowing all of the above players still come to LP to read about winners and what they are doing to to beat the odds. Winners just may be lucky but if they're doing something different, other players want to know. They can decide for themselves if what they read have any merit. Besides, reading all these posts is entertaining.
RJOh,
You're evading my point. Why?
I don't need to tell you that RL-RANDOMLOGIC has made countless claims in this thread alone that his "Digit System" is on the verge of success. In my opinion, he is giving people FALSE HOPE that his program will eventually make them millionaires. When pressed, he denies this. And now, you're denying it. However, there is a trail of evidence in the form of posts all over this site to support my theory that he was very close to the point where he could have gone into business like BobP and others until I started questioning his math. If he was as smart as he thinks he is, he would have ignored me.
My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products, and a low tolerance for low brow attacks made and then edited out within a 20 minute window. The services available at this site, many of them free, make no false claims and they are MORE THAN ENOUGH to provide the kind of entertainment people are seeking. You're right; this IS a fun site, and would still be fun without predators! If RL-RANDOMLOGIC is not a predator, truly believes in his software, and really just wants to help people, why is he so aggressive in this debate?
What is your motivation?
--Jimmy4164
-
Philadelpia/Pennsylvania
United States
Member #2,218
September 1, 2003
6,803 Posts
OfflineQuote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 20, 2010
RJOh,
You're evading my point. Why?
I don't need to tell you that RL-RANDOMLOGIC has made countless claims in this thread alone that his "Digit System" is on the verge of success. In my opinion, he is giving people FALSE HOPE that his program will eventually make them millionaires. When pressed, he denies this. And now, you're denying it. However, there is a trail of evidence in the form of posts all over this site to support my theory that he was very close to the point where he could have gone into business like BobP and others until I started questioning his math. If he was as smart as he thinks he is, he would have ignored me.
My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products, and a low tolerance for low brow attacks made and then edited out within a 20 minute window. The services available at this site, many of them free, make no false claims and they are MORE THAN ENOUGH to provide the kind of entertainment people are seeking. You're right; this IS a fun site, and would still be fun without predators! If RL-RANDOMLOGIC is not a predator, truly believes in his software, and really just wants to help people, why is he so aggressive in this debate?
What is your motivation?
--Jimmy4164
Jimmy to bad your really don't know RL.
The answer to your question is that RL truly wants to help people.
Let me say this again so it sinks in. He really, really wants to help people and expects nothing in return.
-
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 20, 2010
RJOh,
You're evading my point. Why?
I don't need to tell you that RL-RANDOMLOGIC has made countless claims in this thread alone that his "Digit System" is on the verge of success. In my opinion, he is giving people FALSE HOPE that his program will eventually make them millionaires. When pressed, he denies this. And now, you're denying it. However, there is a trail of evidence in the form of posts all over this site to support my theory that he was very close to the point where he could have gone into business like BobP and others until I started questioning his math. If he was as smart as he thinks he is, he would have ignored me.
My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products, and a low tolerance for low brow attacks made and then edited out within a 20 minute window. The services available at this site, many of them free, make no false claims and they are MORE THAN ENOUGH to provide the kind of entertainment people are seeking. You're right; this IS a fun site, and would still be fun without predators! If RL-RANDOMLOGIC is not a predator, truly believes in his software, and really just wants to help people, why is he so aggressive in this debate?
What is your motivation?
--Jimmy4164
Jimmy
You should change your name to MR Wrong, My system is not a RNG and if you think
it is then you are even more stupid then I had first believed and believe me, I think you
to be very very stupid.
Having said that I don't think I need to explain anything more because I believe you are
unable to understand anything that I would write.
RL
....
-
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Sep 20, 2010
RJOh,
You're evading my point. Why?
I don't need to tell you that RL-RANDOMLOGIC has made countless claims in this thread alone that his "Digit System" is on the verge of success. In my opinion, he is giving people FALSE HOPE that his program will eventually make them millionaires. When pressed, he denies this. And now, you're denying it. However, there is a trail of evidence in the form of posts all over this site to support my theory that he was very close to the point where he could have gone into business like BobP and others until I started questioning his math. If he was as smart as he thinks he is, he would have ignored me.
My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products, and a low tolerance for low brow attacks made and then edited out within a 20 minute window. The services available at this site, many of them free, make no false claims and they are MORE THAN ENOUGH to provide the kind of entertainment people are seeking. You're right; this IS a fun site, and would still be fun without predators! If RL-RANDOMLOGIC is not a predator, truly believes in his software, and really just wants to help people, why is he so aggressive in this debate?
What is your motivation?
--Jimmy4164
RJOh
I will take this one if you don't mind, Jimmy If you think you have scuttled my ship then you
are wrong again. I receive even more request for software then before. Many people have
requested software and offered to pay and I tell them that It is not and never will be for sale.
Your complete gross missunderstanding of my software and methods are beyound me. Do I
need to increase the font size for you? Do you even know what a RNG is? RNG stands for
Random Number Generator. A device that tries to generate numbers as close to random
as possible. MY software however starts with "01-02-03-04-05" and continues in sequence
until the all possible sets are tested. My how stupid is jimmy meter just bent the neddle, I
will have to buy one that can just keep going round and round. My software does not make
any predictions but allows the user to view the history of each filter and then make a choice
as to what value or values they want to use. Setting the correct values will always end with
the correct set. I would say that everything that my software does could be done on paper
but might take the average person several years to make even one workup. With the software
a user can do this very quickly.
"My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products."
So what you are saying is. That I am lying and doing an injustice by misrepresentation of the value of
my Free software and that my business which is a couch and small tray table where I do most all of
my programming these days is somehow taking an unfair advantage of the poor people here at LP
that have been suckered into using my Free Software designed to give some advantage when and
if they even choose to use it.
My new Model 4164 dumb-O-meter is spinning out of control.
The great math skills that you have layed down here to give
us uneducated LP members a good spanking for our stupidity
and that has saved the world from my free software is also
as flawed as you are concerning this post.
You insist on backtesting everything using a method that
has no bearing on this system. If you want to test this
software you will find that it is 100% functional baring
any unknown errors that may be within the code.
Heres how I see things
1st. The lottery is designed to get people to play knowing full well that most wont win.
2nd. They know that the promise of winning big money will cause people to play to no end.
3rd. They design each game so that so that the only real winner is the state
4th. They double the cash value of the payout to draw in more players
#5. They tax the hell out of the jackpots so that you are often left with less then 30% of the
advertised jackpot.
#6. They come up with many little jingles and adds to make people think they will get rich if
they play.
#7. They often parade the fact that a QP was used and play down sp's
And the list goes on and on. Yet you in your false since of saving the LP members from falling
into some sort of trap by using my free software or free system of play which for me has proved
over and over to win way more then QP's, shows that the real purveyor of falsehoods is you.
The Lottery is the State of NottingHam
I am Randomlogichood Trying to get the people a fair share of the pot
you are Sherrif of Nottingham in attempting to keep the statis-quo by telling everyone
to do nothing to buck the system or they will loose even more.
hmmmmmmm.....
You are the one that needs to take a good long look
at yourself and ask why you are dumping all over
the place at LP. You are a legend in your own mind
and everyone else thinks LP would be far better off
without you. Well almost everyone, there might be
one or two or maybe even three that share your opinions.
RL
....