Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Sep 21, 2010
RJOh
I will take this one if you don't mind, Jimmy If you think you have scuttled my ship then you
are wrong again. I receive even more request for software then before. Many people have
requested software and offered to pay and I tell them that It is not and never will be for sale.
Your complete gross missunderstanding of my software and methods are beyound me. Do I
need to increase the font size for you? Do you even know what a RNG is? RNG stands for
Random Number Generator. A device that tries to generate numbers as close to random
as possible. MY software however starts with "01-02-03-04-05" and continues in sequence
until the all possible sets are tested. My how stupid is jimmy meter just bent the neddle, I
will have to buy one that can just keep going round and round. My software does not make
any predictions but allows the user to view the history of each filter and then make a choice
as to what value or values they want to use. Setting the correct values will always end with
the correct set. I would say that everything that my software does could be done on paper
but might take the average person several years to make even one workup. With the software
a user can do this very quickly.
"My motivation is a disdain for injustice and unscrupulous business practices, including the misrepresentation of the value of products."
So what you are saying is. That I am lying and doing an injustice by misrepresentation of the value of
my Free software and that my business which is a couch and small tray table where I do most all of
my programming these days is somehow taking an unfair advantage of the poor people here at LP
that have been suckered into using my Free Software designed to give some advantage when and
if they even choose to use it.
My new Model 4164 dumb-O-meter is spinning out of control.
The great math skills that you have layed down here to give
us uneducated LP members a good spanking for our stupidity
and that has saved the world from my free software is also
as flawed as you are concerning this post.
You insist on backtesting everything using a method that
has no bearing on this system. If you want to test this
software you will find that it is 100% functional baring
any unknown errors that may be within the code.
Heres how I see things
1st. The lottery is designed to get people to play knowing full well that most wont win.
2nd. They know that the promise of winning big money will cause people to play to no end.
3rd. They design each game so that so that the only real winner is the state
4th. They double the cash value of the payout to draw in more players
#5. They tax the hell out of the jackpots so that you are often left with less then 30% of the
advertised jackpot.
#6. They come up with many little jingles and adds to make people think they will get rich if
they play.
#7. They often parade the fact that a QP was used and play down sp's
And the list goes on and on. Yet you in your false since of saving the LP members from falling
into some sort of trap by using my free software or free system of play which for me has proved
over and over to win way more then QP's, shows that the real purveyor of falsehoods is you.
The Lottery is the State of NottingHam
I am Randomlogichood Trying to get the people a fair share of the pot
you are Sherrif of Nottingham in attempting to keep the statis-quo by telling everyone
to do nothing to buck the system or they will loose even more.
hmmmmmmm.....
You are the one that needs to take a good long look
at yourself and ask why you are dumping all over
the place at LP. You are a legend in your own mind
and everyone else thinks LP would be far better off
without you. Well almost everyone, there might be
one or two or maybe even three that share your opinions.
RL