somewhere Canada
Member #39,918
May 24, 2006
154 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Feb 13, 2012
No way would I attempt to code this mess for anybody's use.
THERE ARE TOO MANY IFS, POSSIBLES, COULD BES AND MAYBES IN IT. I've said that countless times.
DX123, she has said she made it up before she posted. She acknowledges she don't use it herself; she hasn't shown any results from testing; she won't answer questions, and then turns it into a personal attack when I call it a mess? LMAO
Read all my posts, I don't say things flippantly without doing a pretty thorough investigation. I coded it for testing. Here's the states I've tested:
Add Texas to that list. Would I use it? NO.
Would I suggest anyone in those states use it? NO.
As she has said there are a lot better systems here on LP that do no require anyone to accept contrived notions, or bad math, or believe everything they see on science fiction theater.
In defence of Kola>>>
What exactly are you missing 'garyo' to convert Kola's data into an alogrithm. Never mind expounding on 'your' wants and needs, explain your irrational behaviour to all on the LP, for I have had plenty of ideas that have been converted to programs especially for me, and they have paid out regardless of the DEPTH of UNDERSTANDING. None of them were so adament as you to try and reduce everything to their own whime of disagreement because of this and that in interpreting ideas. My programs work today, yesterday and even into the future, which is where we all want to be with repect to the LOTTERY. I'm sure you will agree...and if you do then you will agree about everything Kola has posted regardless of YOUR thoughts. Those programs contain the winning logic for the win result. Why would you defer that idea when you read these posts and threads? You have been complimented on your programming skills yet remain adolesance in your mindset. Please grow with us, for you can only bring forth something we all may not have thought of. Are you one of us or ...!
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Feb 13, 2012
No way would I attempt to code this mess for anybody's use.
THERE ARE TOO MANY IFS, POSSIBLES, COULD BES AND MAYBES IN IT. I've said that countless times.
DX123, she has said she made it up before she posted. She acknowledges she don't use it herself; she hasn't shown any results from testing; she won't answer questions, and then turns it into a personal attack when I call it a mess? LMAO
Read all my posts, I don't say things flippantly without doing a pretty thorough investigation. I coded it for testing. Here's the states I've tested:
Add Texas to that list. Would I use it? NO.
Would I suggest anyone in those states use it? NO.
As she has said there are a lot better systems here on LP that do no require anyone to accept contrived notions, or bad math, or believe everything they see on science fiction theater.
Uh oh, I've seen this "drama" before, played out on the LP countless times. Well, I willingly plunge into it, and hopefully we can nip it in the bud before it gets to a ridiculous 'back and forth' place.
Okay garyo. I've never attacked anyone on the LP in all my time here. I don't know if that supposed to be reverse psychology or what, because you must realize how disingenuous that comment was...I'm not offended nor threatened by your opinions and comments. I welcome them, so why should I attack you. I just said that you seemed a little angry, maybe from frustration or something. That wasn't an attack. It was my description concerning some of your writing on this thread thus far, because anyone can see your posts have an unpleasant "bite" at times, which is fine, though I know not the reason...I understand that's how you sometimes communicate, and I can still work with that. I have friends who can be unpleasant at times, so in general your "bite" is okay...It just gets in the way a little from moving forward...
Also, how could you have tested the Rings of Pi system in all those states when have shown you don't understand how it works? And yes, I don't use the system. So what? I have a number of systems and many more ideas for systems that I don't use. I have my own personal system, that will possibly never be shown, but fundamental ideas derived from it will be shared. Yet and still, isn't okay to build other systems that people may find useful?
The other comments about "bad math, science fiction, and contrived notions" are fine. I respect those opinions, and respect that you think you really know of what you speak. No hard feelings though, we just think differently. I hope your thinking is working well for you...That's all that counts.
Texas United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,228 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Kola on Feb 14, 2012
Uh oh, I've seen this "drama" before, played out on the LP countless times. Well, I willingly plunge into it, and hopefully we can nip it in the bud before it gets to a ridiculous 'back and forth' place.
Okay garyo. I've never attacked anyone on the LP in all my time here. I don't know if that supposed to be reverse psychology or what, because you must realize how disingenuous that comment was...I'm not offended nor threatened by your opinions and comments. I welcome them, so why should I attack you. I just said that you seemed a little angry, maybe from frustration or something. That wasn't an attack. It was my description concerning some of your writing on this thread thus far, because anyone can see your posts have an unpleasant "bite" at times, which is fine, though I know not the reason...I understand that's how you sometimes communicate, and I can still work with that. I have friends who can be unpleasant at times, so in general your "bite" is okay...It just gets in the way a little from moving forward...
Also, how could you have tested the Rings of Pi system in all those states when have shown you don't understand how it works? And yes, I don't use the system. So what? I have a number of systems and many more ideas for systems that I don't use. I have my own personal system, that will possibly never be shown, but fundamental ideas derived from it will be shared. Yet and still, isn't okay to build other systems that people may find useful?
The other comments about "bad math, science fiction, and contrived notions" are fine. I respect those opinions, and respect that you think you really know of what you speak. No hard feelings though, we just think differently. I hope your thinking is working well for you...That's all that counts.
Fascinating response. A lot of which I agree with. I do make, call them 'biting' comments, I call them acidic, pointed comments. I do that when someone asks for information I just posted. It's the same if your boss or co-worker handed you what you asked for and you said, "But what am I supposed to do with this?"
Surely you have a job. Unless you are Aaron Donahue. Then even your sister and dad calls you a shiftless bum on the internet.
I haven't mastered forward psychology, so I'll leave the reverse stuff to you. But I suppose if you worry what you say as a faceless handle on the internet, you are truly a nervous wreck in real life where people know who you are.
From there your critical thinking skills have taken the rest of the day off. Just because I didn't rewrite that test program or didn't post any calculations doesn't mean I can't do it as you posted it. It merely means I don't need a pat on the head or a cookie.
What I ask of you is to clarify everything so there would be no "you did it wrongs,"after it was done. I don't care if you call it mi-pi, poo-pi and pop-pi (yes, I have a sense of humor and those are my names for pi) as long as there are no maybes, possibles, could bes, or probablies.
Nor does it bother me whether you use this stuff or not. I was recalling the facts as they pertain to this thread for another reader when I wrote that.
The rest? You see drama, reverse psychology, circles with smaller pi and a 1000 points with 333 points between 111 and 222, and are wondering aboutmythinking O_o!?!?
Feel free to pm me anytime and we'll talk about how things are at the psych ward.
Texas United States
Member #114,698
August 5, 2011
4,623 Posts
Offline
This is getting ridiculous Gary-I myself favor pi and I think that Laker would agree with that, and yes I haven't quite figured out a way to use this system yet without spending alot, why so far I only play on paper, but I noticed that you play in Texas alot, this is the only system that I have seen thus far where the hits are there if you know how to utilize many times straight, not only that but the hit is usually in decimal you use before adding the 111, 222 etc....meaning you don't have to play a ton of numbers to get the hit, from now on if you have more negative to add to Kola's progam please pm them..thanks
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Feb 14, 2012
Fascinating response. A lot of which I agree with. I do make, call them 'biting' comments, I call them acidic, pointed comments. I do that when someone asks for information I just posted. It's the same if your boss or co-worker handed you what you asked for and you said, "But what am I supposed to do with this?"
Surely you have a job. Unless you are Aaron Donahue. Then even your sister and dad calls you a shiftless bum on the internet.
I haven't mastered forward psychology, so I'll leave the reverse stuff to you. But I suppose if you worry what you say as a faceless handle on the internet, you are truly a nervous wreck in real life where people know who you are.
From there your critical thinking skills have taken the rest of the day off. Just because I didn't rewrite that test program or didn't post any calculations doesn't mean I can't do it as you posted it. It merely means I don't need a pat on the head or a cookie.
What I ask of you is to clarify everything so there would be no "you did it wrongs,"after it was done. I don't care if you call it mi-pi, poo-pi and pop-pi (yes, I have a sense of humor and those are my names for pi) as long as there are no maybes, possibles, could bes, or probablies.
Nor does it bother me whether you use this stuff or not. I was recalling the facts as they pertain to this thread for another reader when I wrote that.
The rest? You see drama, reverse psychology, circles with smaller pi and a 1000 points with 333 points between 111 and 222, and are wondering aboutmythinking O_o!?!?
Feel free to pm me anytime and we'll talk about how things are at the psych ward.
Wow..This is funny stuff. More sad really... Incredible. My mouth is agape right now. I can't even respond to what you posted. Its a little intense, no? You wrote all that because....? I dunno. Well I see you more clearly now, and what you wrote teaches me about you. Your unkind comments above are trivial to me, and tells me there's something deeper going on with you. May you, during the course of your life, un-root it...Well, I love you anyway, and there nothing you can do about it...Good luck to you Gary. I sincerely mean that.
chicago illinois United States
Member #1,199
February 26, 2003
382 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by kellmellus55 on Feb 11, 2012
Back in 2007 Sfilppo made an easy devil program which did the 4- PI calculations some people still have a copy.
Can someone please e-mail me his program easy devil and lite. I have his Duke and Emma lou. I would like to compare his with Lottolaughs using kola system.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,950 Posts
Offline
I'm still checking around for someone to program this including the mirror section. Maybe someone in this forum will come forward and make a great program.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,950 Posts
Offline
I did a slight twist by incorporating the Kola Spawn method with a pi multiplication. I used some draws from NM from last week to see if pairs are produced by these methods.
049
284=
223 (lotto math) . Then I used 223 {a pi Tier one} times pi and got 700. Then, I put in a rundown program and got a box hit 3 draws later. The draw was 382 on this past Tuesday. Although its not +111 rundown like this thread has shown , its a hit.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,950 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lakerben on Apr 19, 2012
I did a slight twist by incorporating the Kola Spawn method with a pi multiplication. I used some draws from NM from last week to see if pairs are produced by these methods.
049
284=
223 (lotto math) . Then I used 223 {a pi Tier one} times pi and got 700. Then, I put in a rundown program and got a box hit 3 draws later. The draw was 382 on this past Tuesday. Although its not +111 rundown like this thread has shown , its a hit.
7
0
0
6
9
9
8
2
3
5
8
8
9
4
6
4
7
7
0
6
9
3
6
6
1
8
2
2
5
5
2
0
5
1
4
4
3
2
8
0
3
3
4
4
1
9
2
2
5
6
4
8
1
1
6
8
7
7
0
0
7
0
0
Upon further testing I used the 049 + 284 =223 lotto math.
223 /1.732= 128.752886 round to 129. I put in a rundownm program and a the next draw(488) hit as a straight!
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,950 Posts
Offline
If I did the procedure correct I took last Saturday's and Fridays draw and added them together since they are in the same tier. I'm still looking for someone to step up and program this system. That will eliminate the mistakes if any.