Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,309 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lottomeister on Apr 15, 2017
Please show us the ones that do work so we can test them. Unfortunately you are in the minority here. They may work from time to time but not enough to show a profit. The times they don't work far outweigh the times they do resulting in a negative ROI. If they worked, again the lotteries would be out of business. If your methodology works please post a chart on your winning and losing days and how much invested for the month and your ROI. 91 straights on 333? How long and how much were people playing that number before it hit? They could still have a negative ROI when it did. Talk is cheap and numbers don't lie.
I can show you a system that "works" 100% of the time, but you can't show a profit playing 1000 pick-3 combos. We're talking about a game that pays 500 to 1, but the top LP pick-3 predictor can't even get even money.
"If your methodology works please post a chart on your winning and losing days"
A very reasonable request, but the laker guy says "works", not win. They won't be showing their system that costs $50 to collect $40.
"and how much invested for the month and your ROI. 91 straights on 333?"
$45,000 isn't very much considering some states payout over $2 million or more on "triples". An individual bookie probably paid out more than that. They won't be showing any winning system not anytime in the future.
Germany
Member #174,817
May 14, 2016
654 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Apr 16, 2017
I can show you a system that "works" 100% of the time, but you can't show a profit playing 1000 pick-3 combos. We're talking about a game that pays 500 to 1, but the top LP pick-3 predictor can't even get even money.
"If your methodology works please post a chart on your winning and losing days"
A very reasonable request, but the laker guy says "works", not win. They won't be showing their system that costs $50 to collect $40.
"and how much invested for the month and your ROI. 91 straights on 333?"
$45,000 isn't very much considering some states payout over $2 million or more on "triples". An individual bookie probably paid out more than that. They won't be showing any winning system not anytime in the future.
.......it looks like laker apparently uses a hodge podge of 87 different systems much like the varieties of a certain catsup.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
25,104 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Apr 16, 2017
I can show you a system that "works" 100% of the time, but you can't show a profit playing 1000 pick-3 combos. We're talking about a game that pays 500 to 1, but the top LP pick-3 predictor can't even get even money.
"If your methodology works please post a chart on your winning and losing days"
A very reasonable request, but the laker guy says "works", not win. They won't be showing their system that costs $50 to collect $40.
"and how much invested for the month and your ROI. 91 straights on 333?"
$45,000 isn't very much considering some states payout over $2 million or more on "triples". An individual bookie probably paid out more than that. They won't be showing any winning system not anytime in the future.
Go argue with the old ladies at the bingo hall that is your goal.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
25,104 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lottomeister on Apr 16, 2017
.......it looks like laker apparently uses a hodge podge of 87 different systems much like the varieties of a certain catsup.
I've been playing for years so listening to a select few of negative people only makes me laugh. This is why many great posters have left because of the professional whiners.
My expertise doesn't wane I just get better every day.
I have to go cash in more tickets. Like the old saying you reap what you sow.
San Angelo, Texas United States
Member #1,097
January 31, 2003
1,648 Posts
Offline
After reading LP posts for more than 10 years, I'm thoroughly convinced that few visitors are sincerely interested in adopting new ways of generating integers for play.
Every lottery gambler already has a theory and a method.
These back and forth, mostly negative posts pretty well prove that no one, particularly system players, is really interested in changing anything.
Winning a lottery game is hard.
Despite the many posts by folks who claim they are winning, there is not much hard evidence that anyone has found ways to win on a consistent basis.
Yes, official lottery sales reports show that many players/gamblers are winning everyday, but we aren't given any information about the winning tickets - quick pick vs personal picks.
Perhaps the folks who are laughing all the way to the bank on a frequent basis are keeping quiet, or are unwilling to reveal their methods.
I have a method.
I win now and then, but, unless I manage to make all the right choices and win something significant, I'll never recapture my losses - which is OK.
I think folks who are making ROI a big issue need to step back and accept the fact that most folks really don't care about odds, percentages, probabilities and the status of their won/lost sheet, if they have one.
We all want to win, but I think most of us understand what gambling is and, where lottery gaming is concerned, the chances of actually winning are very slim.
United States
Member #180,181
February 23, 2017
125 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by bobby623 on Apr 16, 2017
After reading LP posts for more than 10 years, I'm thoroughly convinced that few visitors are sincerely interested in adopting new ways of generating integers for play.
Every lottery gambler already has a theory and a method.
These back and forth, mostly negative posts pretty well prove that no one, particularly system players, is really interested in changing anything.
Winning a lottery game is hard.
Despite the many posts by folks who claim they are winning, there is not much hard evidence that anyone has found ways to win on a consistent basis.
Yes, official lottery sales reports show that many players/gamblers are winning everyday, but we aren't given any information about the winning tickets - quick pick vs personal picks.
Perhaps the folks who are laughing all the way to the bank on a frequent basis are keeping quiet, or are unwilling to reveal their methods.
I have a method.
I win now and then, but, unless I manage to make all the right choices and win something significant, I'll never recapture my losses - which is OK.
I think folks who are making ROI a big issue need to step back and accept the fact that most folks really don't care about odds, percentages, probabilities and the status of their won/lost sheet, if they have one.
We all want to win, but I think most of us understand what gambling is and, where lottery gaming is concerned, the chances of actually winning are very slim.
I think some of the negativity is just frustration. over the last dozen years or so I've spent countless hours trying to find the perfect strategy that would land me a winner and while my programming skills and math have dramatically improved I'm technically no closer to finding a system than when I first started.
That can be frustrating and I think some of the negativity that you are referring to is a reflection of people going through the same cycle of having history tested dozens of strategies and seeing the same losing results over and over again.
Personally after having simulated so many strategies and seeing how much money I would lose if I had played them for 10 or 15 years makes it hard for me to justify playing for real.
That said I will still occasionally real play just to test the luck factor. I have been fortunate in that I got lucky with a couple of second place finishes that still have me in the black, but at my current win rate since returning to NY I will be in the red in the next 2 years or so.
I'm not giving up and I do believe that the lessons I have learned will help me make smarter choices such as avoiding picking number combinations that have almost no probability of appearing in a given drawing, but unfortunately that still leaves a boatload of other possibilities.
In the end it has definitely helped me appreciate the fact that the math does not lie.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
25,104 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by bobby623 on Apr 16, 2017
After reading LP posts for more than 10 years, I'm thoroughly convinced that few visitors are sincerely interested in adopting new ways of generating integers for play.
Every lottery gambler already has a theory and a method.
These back and forth, mostly negative posts pretty well prove that no one, particularly system players, is really interested in changing anything.
Winning a lottery game is hard.
Despite the many posts by folks who claim they are winning, there is not much hard evidence that anyone has found ways to win on a consistent basis.
Yes, official lottery sales reports show that many players/gamblers are winning everyday, but we aren't given any information about the winning tickets - quick pick vs personal picks.
Perhaps the folks who are laughing all the way to the bank on a frequent basis are keeping quiet, or are unwilling to reveal their methods.
I have a method.
I win now and then, but, unless I manage to make all the right choices and win something significant, I'll never recapture my losses - which is OK.
I think folks who are making ROI a big issue need to step back and accept the fact that most folks really don't care about odds, percentages, probabilities and the status of their won/lost sheet, if they have one.
We all want to win, but I think most of us understand what gambling is and, where lottery gaming is concerned, the chances of actually winning are very slim.
The Nm games have a ton of repeats 502 today lately so as a result it's good to bet repeat digits. Its all about being on top of the game.
If anyone doesn't have any confidence in their abilities at this then they may consider another form of entertainment . I see many naysayers on this site that fall into a funk and only log on to pour on the sour grapes which is a complete waste of time.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,309 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lakerben on Apr 16, 2017
Go argue with the old ladies at the bingo hall that is your goal.
NM smaller population bets heavy regardless.
"NM smaller population bets heavy regardless"
Maybe compared to Alaska, Hawaii or Utah, but not even in the same ball park with states like West Virginia and Delaware or even the District of Columbia all with a smaller population than NM. Where do you get your information from?
Germany
Member #174,817
May 14, 2016
654 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lakerben on Apr 16, 2017
I've been playing for years so listening to a select few of negative people only makes me laugh. This is why many great posters have left because of the professional whiners.
My expertise doesn't wane I just get better every day.
I have to go cash in more tickets. Like the old saying you reap what you sow.
Have a cold beer and chill.
I'm not at all negative. I have won many times. Have you hit a win 4 straight? I have and have the ticket to prove it.. And plenty of pic 3 straights over the years but not every day or week. But I am in the red like most people and continue to play once in awhile. You just seem to suffer from a severe case of Bragadosis. Must be the beer talking.
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
25,104 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lottomeister on Apr 16, 2017
I'm not at all negative. I have won many times. Have you hit a win 4 straight? I have and have the ticket to prove it.. And plenty of pic 3 straights over the years but not every day or week. But I am in the red like most people and continue to play once in awhile. You just seem to suffer from a severe case of Bragadosis. Must be the beer talking.
Lottomister I wish we had pick 4. The commision won't start one they are too busy with scratch offs. Many people have asked but to no avail. Being positive is important otherwise a bettor should go for a quick pick. I did have one beer last night but I hit the dry sauna and steam room today so I'm ready to roll!
New Mexico United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
25,104 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Apr 16, 2017
"NM smaller population bets heavy regardless"
Maybe compared to Alaska, Hawaii or Utah, but not even in the same ball park with states like West Virginia and Delaware or even the District of Columbia all with a smaller population than NM. Where do you get your information from?
What does any of your negative garbage matter to anyone? What is your point? Get a grip already! All your posts are doom and gloom. Wow!
I have helped many people on this site win period. I have tons of pms and emails asking for help.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,309 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Novan60 on Apr 16, 2017
I think some of the negativity is just frustration. over the last dozen years or so I've spent countless hours trying to find the perfect strategy that would land me a winner and while my programming skills and math have dramatically improved I'm technically no closer to finding a system than when I first started.
That can be frustrating and I think some of the negativity that you are referring to is a reflection of people going through the same cycle of having history tested dozens of strategies and seeing the same losing results over and over again.
Personally after having simulated so many strategies and seeing how much money I would lose if I had played them for 10 or 15 years makes it hard for me to justify playing for real.
That said I will still occasionally real play just to test the luck factor. I have been fortunate in that I got lucky with a couple of second place finishes that still have me in the black, but at my current win rate since returning to NY I will be in the red in the next 2 years or so.
I'm not giving up and I do believe that the lessons I have learned will help me make smarter choices such as avoiding picking number combinations that have almost no probability of appearing in a given drawing, but unfortunately that still leaves a boatload of other possibilities.
In the end it has definitely helped me appreciate the fact that the math does not lie.
"Personally after having simulated so many strategies and seeing how much money I would lose if I had played them for 10 or 15 years makes it hard for me to justify playing for real."
Any strategy will produce hits, plus or minus standard deviation from probability; the trick is all in the timing by playing it at the right time.
"In the end it has definitely helped me appreciate the fact that the math does not lie."
Laker is playing fast and loose with the word "works" hoping that LP members are stupid enough to believe "works" some how translates into "shows a profit" even when the is a huge loss. The probability of +1, -1, or the same digit repeating are exactly the same as any one of the other seven digits being drawn. Together the 27 three digit combos produced by that strategy has exactly the same chance as winning as any three digits used in the three digits positions.
When those three digits hit in the box after two or three plays, a hit is claimed though it cost at least $27 playing straight/box which creates a loss after just two drawings.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,309 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lakerben on Apr 16, 2017
What does any of your negative garbage matter to anyone? What is your point? Get a grip already! All your posts are doom and gloom. Wow!
I have helped many people on this site win period. I have tons of pms and emails asking for help.
And all you do is whine!
I'm just pointing out the fact that you have no clue what you're saying.
"NM smaller population bets heavy regardless."
Which part of West Virginia, Delaware and the District of Columbia all have smaller populations than New Mexico is confusing you?
West Virginia sold more than twice as many pick-3 tickets than your "betting heavy" New Mexico players. FYI, your state ranks 47 in per capita lottery sales. The only negativity here is being posted by you when LP members point out when you distort the facts.
Seriously, if you don't want to be corrected, post in the Mystical Forum.